Preprint Open Access

Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity is an artefact of historical forcing

Rypdal, Martin; Fredriksen, Hege-Beate; Rypdal, Kristoffer; Steene, Rebekka

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="" xmlns="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1183781</identifier>
      <creatorName>Rypdal, Martin</creatorName>
      <affiliation>UiT The Arctic University of Norway</affiliation>
      <creatorName>Fredriksen, Hege-Beate</creatorName>
      <affiliation>UiT The Arctic University of Norway</affiliation>
      <creatorName>Rypdal, Kristoffer</creatorName>
      <affiliation>UiT The Arctic University of Norway</affiliation>
      <creatorName>Steene, Rebekka</creatorName>
      <affiliation>UiT The Arctic University of Norway</affiliation>
    <title>Emergent Constraint On Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity Is An Artefact Of Historical Forcing</title>
    <subject>climate change, equilibrium climate sensitivity, emergent constraint</subject>
    <date dateType="Issued">2018-02-23</date>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Preprint</resourceType>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url"></alternateIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.1183780</relatedIdentifier>
    <rights rightsURI="">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is widely used in assessments of anthropogenic climate change, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; has estimated the likely range of ECS to be between 1.5 and 4.5 K, with a best estimate of 3 K. Estimates of ECS from observational data are uncertain, and long time series are required due to the slow thermal response of the deep oceans. The estimates are therefore largely based on experiments in Earth system models (ESMs), and part of the uncertainty in the ECS reflects the disagreement among models. Recently, Cox &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; presented a method for weighting the ESMs based on how well they reproduce a theoretically informed metric of the instrumental temperature record for the years 1880 to 2016. By demonstrating that the models with higher ECS deviate more from the instrumental temperature record according to this metric, they narrowed the likely range to be between 2.2 and 3.4 K, which would imply a reduced risk of dangerous global warming. This result, however, is an artefact induced by the anthropogenic trend manifest in the last forty years of the temperature record. When the analysis is repeated using data for the years 1880-1975 there is no emergent constraint on ECS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>


Cite as