TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INFORMATION SCIENCE-FROM EARLY AGE TO CONTEMPORARY PERIOD: TAKE A RELOOK
P. K. Paul;
P. S. Aithal;
Information Science is one of the important knowledge clusters responsible for Information activities ranging from information collection, selection, organization, processing and management. Though, ultimately Information Science is responsible for information dissemination. Information Science initially treated as information field but the advancement of tools and technologies changes the entire arena of Information Science. Today rather than information field it is treated as Applied Science domain with Social Science touch. Information Science is today responsible for Information-Technology-People interaction. Information Science changes it dimension with the advancement of knowledge cluster and IT. The paper is talks about Information Science including its need and role and generation wise characteristics and development. Paper highlighted changing dimension, tools and technologies related with Information Science.
1. Cohen, E. B. (2004). Applying the Informing Science Framework to Higher Education: Knowledge Development, Management, and Dissemination. Konferencja Pozyskiwanie wiedzy i zarządzanie wiedzą (Proceedings of the Knowledge Acquisition and Management Conference) May 13-15, 2004 Kule, Poland. 2. Cohen, Eli B. and Nycz Malgorzata (2006). Learning Objects and E-Learning: an Informing Science Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects Volume 2, 2006. 3. Martin, S.B. (1998). Information technology, employment, and the information sector: Trends in information employment 1970–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1053–1069. 4. Michael Buckland and Ziming liu (1995).History of information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 30: 385-416. 5. Paul, P. K. (2012). Information Scientist: Roles and Values with special Reference to their Appropriate Academic Programme and its availability in India. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 4, October-December-2012, Page-245-248, 6. Paul,P.K., D Chaterjee,R Bhatnagar, Uma Pricilda (2012). Information Scientist: Contemporary innovative techno management roles with special reference to Information Scientist Vs Information Technologist: A Study, Indian Journal of Information Science and Applications [IJISA], Vol. 2. No. 1, Jan-Jun-2012, Academic Research Publication, New Delhi, Page-47-50. 7. Paul, P. K., Ashok Kumar, Dipak Chaterjee (2012). Health Informatics and its Practice: Emerging Domain of Information Science-Indian Scenario. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Chemical Research, Vol. 2 No. 2, Page- 83-87, 8. Prantosh Kr. Pau1, K L Dangwal and Dipak Chaterjee, (2012). Information Technology and Advance Computing and their interaction for healthy Education, Techning, and learning: The IKM Approach. Asian Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, V-1, No. 4, Page- 70-77. 9. Paul,P.K. , R Rajesh, D Chatterjee, M K Ghose (2013). Information Scientist: Technological and Managerial Skill requirement in 21st century. Information Studies Vol. 19, No. 1, Page-29-36. 10. Paul, P.K., (2013). MSc-Information Science [Geo Informatics]: Overview emphasizing twoproposed curriculum for sophisticated Geo Spatial development. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research (IJPBR), Vol 4 Issue 5 Page 218-227. 11. Pau1, P.K., K L Dangwal, A Kumar (2013). Information Infrastructure and Academic and Education World: The Role and Opportunities in Contemporary Perspective. International Journal of Education for Peace and Development: Vol. 1 No. 1 Page-31-36. 12. Reichman, F. (1961). Notched Cards. In R. Shaw (Ed.), The state of the library art04(01), pp. 11–55). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, The State University, Graduate School of Library Service. 13. Saracevic, T. (1996). Relevance reconsidered. Information science: Integration in perspectives. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (pp. 201–218), Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal School of Library and Information Science. 14. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 26(6), 321–343. 15. Saracevic, T. (1979a). An essay on the past and future of information science education. I. Historical overview. Information Processing &Management, 15(1), 1–15. 16. Saracevic, T. (1979b). An essay on the past and future of information science education. II. Unresolved problems of 'extemalities' of education Information Processing & Management, 15(4), 291–301. 17. Vakkari, S.P. (1996). Library and information science: Content and scope. In J. Olaisen, E. Munch-Petersen, & P. Wilson (Eds.), Information science: From development of the discipline to social interaction. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. 18. Vickery, B.C., & Vickery, A. (1987). Information science in theory and practice. London: Butterworths. 19. Wersig, G., & Neveling, U. (1975). The phenomena of interest to information science. Information Scientist, 9, 127–140. 20. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99–168. 21. Information Science (2017) availed on 10-09-2017 at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_ science 22. iSchools Organization (2017) availed on 10-09-2017 at http://ischools.org/about/ 23. College of Information & Communication (2017), University of Carolina availed on 10-09-2017 at http://www.libsci.sc.edu/bob/istchron/iscnet/ischron.html 24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science (availed on 10-09-2017) 25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology (availed on 10-09-2017)