There is a newer version of this record available.

Book section Open Access

Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral

Haspelmath, Martin

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="" xmlns:oai_dc="" xmlns:xsi="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <dc:creator>Haspelmath, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:description>Grammaticalization is nowadays often seen primarily as a kind of semantic-pragmatic change, but in the 19th century it was more typically seen in a holistic typological pespective: The idea was that synthetic languages develop from analytic languages, and that they may become analytic again. This kind of development is indeed occasionally observed in entire languages, as in the Romance languages and in Later Egyptian, but it is quite unclear whether such holistic changes are at all common. Similarly, there seems to be no good evidence that changes from agglutinative patterns to isolating patterns go through an intermediate flective or fusional stage. By contrast, there is abundant evidence for the old observation that older tightly bound constructions often get competition from new constructions based on content items, which may eventually replace the older patterns (I call this kind of process anasynthesis). Such anasynthetic changes are driven by inflationary processes that can be observed elsewhere in language and culture, not by therapeutic motivations.</dc:description>
  <dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
  <dc:subject>grammaticalization, language typology, synthetic language</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral</dc:title>
All versions This version
Views 569518
Downloads 666625
Data volume 249.4 MB238.0 MB
Unique views 517476
Unique downloads 608578


Cite as