Journal article Open Access

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol

Blanco, David; Kirkham, Jamie J; Altman, Douglas G; Moher, David; Boutron, Isabelle; Cobo, Erik


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">reporting guidelines, completeness of reporting, peer review</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120174434.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">1061509</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Kirkham, Jamie J</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Altman, Douglas G</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Centre for Journalology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2434-4206</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Moher, David</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Centred' Epidémiologie Clinique, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5263-6241</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Boutron, Isabelle</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Department of Statistics and Operational Research, Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-3534-5602</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Cobo, Erik</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">326416</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:0e1e0051157a7797f733b0024c7091d3</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/1061509/files/Blanco2017.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2017-11-17</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-miror</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:1061509</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Department of Statistics and Operational Research, Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2961-9328</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Blanco, David</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-miror</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">676207</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Methods in Research on Research</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt; There is evidence that the use of some&lt;br&gt;
reporting guidelines, such as the Consolidated Standards&lt;br&gt;
for Reporting Trials, is associated with improved&lt;br&gt;
completeness of reporting in health research. However,&lt;br&gt;
the current levels of adherence to reporting guidelines are&lt;br&gt;
suboptimal. Over the last few years, several actions aiming&lt;br&gt;
to improve compliance with reporting guidelines have been&lt;br&gt;
taken and proposed. We will conduct a scoping review of&lt;br&gt;
interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines&lt;br&gt;
in health research that have been evaluated or suggested,&lt;br&gt;
in order to inform future interventions.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Methods and analysis&lt;/strong&gt; Our review will follow the Joanna&lt;br&gt;
Briggs Institute scoping review methods manual. We will&lt;br&gt;
search for relevant studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE and&lt;br&gt;
Cochrane Library databases. Moreover, we will carry out&lt;br&gt;
lateral searches from the reference lists of the included&lt;br&gt;
studies, as well as from the lists of articles citing the&lt;br&gt;
included ones. One reviewer will screen the full list, which&lt;br&gt;
will be randomly split into two halves and independently&lt;br&gt;
screened by the other two reviewers. Two reviewers will&lt;br&gt;
perform data extraction independently. Discrepancies&lt;br&gt;
will be solved through discussion. In addition, this search&lt;br&gt;
strategy will be supplemented by a grey literature search.&lt;br&gt;
The interventions found will be classified as assessed or&lt;br&gt;
suggested, as well as according to different criteria, in&lt;br&gt;
relation to their target (journal policies, journal editors,&lt;br&gt;
authors, reviewers, funders, ethical boards or others) or&lt;br&gt;
the research stage at which they are performed (design,&lt;br&gt;
conducting, reporting or peer review). Descriptive&lt;br&gt;
statistical analysis will be performed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ethics and dissemination&lt;/strong&gt; A paper summarising the&lt;br&gt;
findings from this review will be published in a peer reviewed&lt;br&gt;
journal. This scoping review will contribute to a&lt;br&gt;
better understanding and a broader perspective on how&lt;br&gt;
the problem of adhering better to reporting guidelines&lt;br&gt;
has been tackled so far. This could be a major first&lt;br&gt;
step towards developing future strategies to improve&lt;br&gt;
compliance with reporting guidelines in health research.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1136/ bmjopen-2017-017551</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
78
72
views
downloads
Views 78
Downloads 72
Data volume 23.5 MB
Unique views 70
Unique downloads 71

Share

Cite as