Journal article Open Access

Building Momentum for Evidence-Based Policymaking in State and Local Governments

Myers, Hannah; Naimpally, Rohit

DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:adms="" xmlns:cnt="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:dct="" xmlns:dctype="" xmlns:dcat="" xmlns:duv="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:frapo="" xmlns:geo="" xmlns:gsp="" xmlns:locn="" xmlns:org="" xmlns:owl="" xmlns:prov="" xmlns:rdfs="" xmlns:schema="" xmlns:skos="" xmlns:vcard="" xmlns:wdrs="">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:type rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype=""></dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource=""/>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
        <foaf:name>Myers, Hannah</foaf:name>
            <foaf:name>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</foaf:name>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
        <foaf:name>Naimpally, Rohit</foaf:name>
            <foaf:name>J-PAL North America</foaf:name>
    <dct:title>Building Momentum for Evidence-Based Policymaking in State and Local Governments</dct:title>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="">2017</dct:issued>
    <dcat:keyword>big data</dcat:keyword>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="">2017-09-04</dct:issued>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource=""/>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype=""></skos:notation>
    <dct:isVersionOf rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;What if policymakers allocated government funding based on scientific evidence of what works, instead of anecdote, status quo, or political belief? In most major policy debates, compelling&amp;mdash;but theoretical&amp;mdash; arguments can be made on both sides. But despite increasing pressure to &amp;ldquo;use big data&amp;rdquo; to inform decisions especially when resources are scarce, it&amp;rsquo;s often challenging for policymakers to disaggregate the impacts of a specific program from broader economic and societal conditions&amp;mdash;and to separate good research from bad. By using data they already collect and applying the same scientific tool that transformed modern medicine&amp;mdash;randomized evaluations&amp;mdash;to social policy, researchers and policymakers can work together to cut through opinion and build an arsenal of rigorous evidence in its place. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; Despite the hyperpartisan climate of politics in many areas of the world today, the evidence-based policymaking movement is gaining traction. In the United States, Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan, Democratic Senator Patty Murray and President Obama came together last year to enact legislation creating a federal Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking, which aims to develop a strategy for increasing the availability and use of data to build evidence about government programs. State and local governments&amp;mdash;who are collectively responsible for spending $2.5 trillion each year (about 40 percent of the total government spending)&amp;mdash;are also joining in. In Washington State, for example, state human services departments track and report the percentage of funding allocated for evidence-based and/or research-based programs. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; Reorienting government decision-making to identify and fund programs that work can be slow and challenging, but can make a real difference in people&amp;rsquo;s lives. We offer five concrete steps state and local policymakers can take to use data effectively and ensure the greatest return on taxpayer dollars&lt;/p&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource=""/>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
          <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="">
            <rdfs:label>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rdfs:label>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource=""/>
All versions This version
Views 188154
Downloads 117109
Data volume 30.5 MB29.7 MB
Unique views 173142
Unique downloads 10193


Cite as