1035885
doi
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x
oai:zenodo.org:1035885
HOMEOPATHY IS UNSCIENTIFIC AND UNETHICAL: Homeopathy Is Unscientific and Unethical
Smith, Kevin
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
In opposition to the premises of Against Homeopathy – a Utilitarian Perspective,
all four respondents base their objections on the central claims
that homeopathy is in fact scientifically plausible and is supported by
empirical evidence. Despite ethical aspects forming the main thrust of
Against Homeopathy, the respondents' focus on scientific aspects represents
sound strategy, since the ethical case against homeopathy would be
weakened concomitant with the extent to which any plausibility for homeopathy
could be demonstrated. The trouble here is that the respondents are
attempting to perpetuate a sterile debate. The notion that homeopathic
preparations could have any biological effects represents a fringe viewpoint,
one not entertained by serious scientists nor supported by reason
and evidence.
In the present article, I shall endeavour to explain why the respondents
do not have a valid case. I will deal firstly with their general approach to
scientific plausibility and evidence, and then consider some of the specific
claims they have made. Finally, I will answer the philosophical arguments
some of the respondents have raised.
Zenodo
2012-04-17
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1035884
1579542153.727745
81739
md5:cc6af4029e47df8151485058c0980dd2
https://zenodo.org/records/1035885/files/article.pdf
public