Published October 31, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Actionable, long-term stable and semantic web compatible identifiers for access to biological collection objects

Description

Guentsch, A, Hyam, R, Hagedorn, G, Chagnoux, S, Roepert, D, Casino, A, Droege, G, Gloeckler, F, Goedderz, K, Groom, Q, Hoffmann, J, Holleman, A, Kempa, M, Koivula, H, Marhold, K, Nicolson, N, Smith, VS, Triebel, D (2017): Actionable, long-term stable and semantic web compatible identifiers for access to biological collection objects. Database 2017: 1-9, DOI: 10.1093/database/bax003

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFEE902BFFAA106D6C78792AFFFB960B

Related works

References

  • 1. Duckworth,W.D., Genoways,H.H. and Rose,C.L. (1993) Preserving Natural Science Collections: Chronicle of Our Environmental Heritage. National Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Property, Washington, DC.
  • 2. Chapman,A.D. (2005) Principles of Data Quality, version 1.0. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen.
  • 3. Guntsch,A., Mergen,P. and Berendsohn,W.G. (2007) The BioCASE Project - a Biological Access Service for Europe. Ferrantia, 51, 103-108.
  • 4. Canhos,V.P., Souza,S.D., Giovanni,R.D. et al. (2004) Global Biodiversity Informatics: setting the scene for a "new world" of ecological forecasting. Biodiversity Informatics, 1, 1-13.
  • 5. Holetschek,J., Kelbert,P., Muller,A. et al. (2009) International Networking of Large Amounts of Primary Biodiversity Data. In: Fischer S, Maehle E, Reischuk R, editors. INFORMATIK 2009, Im Focus das Leben, Beitrage der 39. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft fur Informatik e.V. (GI), 28.9. - 2.10. in Lubeck. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), 154, 552-564.
  • 6. De Giovanni,R., Doring,M., Guntsch,A. et al. (2010). TDWG Access Protocol for Information Retrieval (TAPIR), Version 1.0. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), http://www.tdwg.org/standards/449.
  • 7. Wieczorek,J., Bloom,D., Guralnick,R. et al. (2012) Darwin core: an evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS One, 7, e29715.
  • 8. Holetschek,J., Droge,G., Guntsch,A. et al. (2012) The ABCD of primary biodiversity data access. Plant Biosyst., 146, 771-779.
  • 9. Hull,D., Wolstencroft,K., Stevens,R. et al. (2006) Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 729-732.
  • 10. Altintas,I., Berkley,C., Jaeger,E. et al. (2004) Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. In: Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Proceedings. 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, SSDBM '04, San Diego, pp. 423-424.
  • 11. Richards,K. (2009) TDWG GUID Applicability Statement, Version 2010-09. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). http://www.tdwg.org/standards/150.
  • 12. Guralnick,R.P., Cellinese,N., Deck,J. et al. (2015) Community next steps for making globally unique identifiers work for biocollections data. ZooKeys, 494, 133-154.
  • 13. Hyam,R.D., Drinkwater,R.E., and Harris,D.J. (2012) Stable citations for herbarium specimens on the internet: an illustration from a taxonomic revision of Duboscia (Malvaceae). Phytotaxa, 73, 17-30.
  • 14. Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (2015) CETAF Strategy and Strategic Development Plan 2015-2025. http://cetaf.org/sites/default/files/final_strategy_and_strategic_development_plan.pdf.
  • 15. Berners-Lee,T., Fielding,R., and Masinter,L. (2005) Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986.
  • 16. Hagedorn,G., Catapano,T., Guntsch,A. et al. (2013) Best practices for stable URIs. http://wiki.pro-ibiosphere.eu/wiki/Best_ practices_for_stable_URIs.
  • Dublin Core Metadata Initiative: Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1. http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
  • 18. Droege,G., Barker,K., Astrin,J. et al. (2014) The global genome biodiversity network (GGBN) data portal. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D607-D612.
  • 19. Anonymous (2015) CETAF Specimen Preview Profile. http://ceta fidentifiers.biowikifarm.net/wiki/CSPP.
  • 20. Ride,W.D.L., Cogger,H.G., Dupuis,C. et al. (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, London.
  • 21. McNeill,J., Barrie,F.R., Buck,W.R. et al. (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code): adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July. Koeltz Scientific Books, Konigstein.
  • 22. German,D.A., Tekin,M., Spaniel,S. et al. (2016) A brief taxonomic revision of Physoptychis (Alysseae, Brassicaceae). Phytotaxa, 258, 75-82.
  • 23. Marhold,K., Kempa,M., and Al-Shehbaz,I.A. (2015) Lectotypification of names of Himalayan Brassicaceae taxa currently placed in the genus Cardamine. PhytoKeys, 50, 9-23.
  • 24. Pullan,M.R., Watson,M.F., Kennedy,J.B. et al. (2000) The Prometheus Taxonomic Model: a practical approach to representing multiple taxonomies. Taxon, 49, 55-75.