2024-03-28T19:48:57Z
https://zenodo.org/oai2d
oai:zenodo.org:5566239
2021-10-14T01:48:29Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Boutron N.
Petter F.
Trontin C.
2019-12-12
<p>The EPPO Database on Diagnostic expertise (<a href="http://dc.eppo.int/index.php">http://dc.eppo.int/index.php</a>) includes a specific section on validation data for diagnostic tests (<a href="http://dc.eppo.int/validationlist.php">http://dc.eppo.int/validationlist.php</a>). Laboratories can deposit online validation data that they have generated on specific tests and these can be made visible to all users of the database. The validation data can then be retrieved from the database in the form of a PDF file including the description of the test evaluated (pest x matrix x method) and the performance data related to the test (the information is presented in a harmonized format). There is currently no possibility to sort the data except by pest and method.</p>
<p>One of the objectives of VALITEST is to improve the searching capacity of the database to ensure optimal use. This report presents the new features of the validation section that have been identified from the survey and from discussions with users and with VALITEST partners. IT developments are ongoing. The new version of the EPPO Database on diagnostic expertise will be launched in April 2020.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566239
oai:zenodo.org:5566239
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566238
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
searching capacity improvement
validation section
plant health
VALITEST - D6.6 Report on improved version of the validation section of the EPPO Database on diagnostic expertise, including new data provided by laboratories
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5561753
2021-10-13T12:41:32Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Alič Š.
Anthoine G.
Chabirand A.
Chappé AM.
Dreo T.
Jakomin T.
Laurenson L.
Lukežič T.
Mehle N.
Metz-Verschure E.
Mouaziz H.
Oorspronk J.
Pirc M.
Ravnikar M.
te Braak N.
Tomlinson J.
Westenberg M.
2020-02-11
<p>We prepared a list of methods and tests for validation in test performance study (TPS) Round 1, both for laboratory and on-site use, for 6 selected pests: <em>Erwinia amylovora</em>, <em>Pantoea stewartii</em> subsp. <em>stewartii</em>, citrus tristeza virus, plum pox virus, <em>Fusarium circinatum</em> and <em>Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</em>. The listed tests were first validated in preliminary studies by TPS organizers in order to select the final tests for TPS, based on the scope and criteria prepared in D1.1.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5561753
oai:zenodo.org:5561753
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5561752
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
test performance study
plant health
Erwinia amylowora
Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii
plum pox virus
citrus tristeza virus
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Fusarium circinatum
pest
VALITEST - D1.2 List of tests for validation - Round 1
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5565031
2021-10-13T12:24:15Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Boutron N.
Trontin C.
Petter F.
2020-11-03
<p>The training and dissemination plan presents the objectives of training and disseminations and the tools provided to ensure that the objectives will be met.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5565031
oai:zenodo.org:5565031
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5565030
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
guidelines
communication
education
plant health
VALITEST - D6.4 Dissemination and Training plan
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5564889
2021-10-13T12:45:24Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Rolland M.
2020-02-10
<p>The 5<sup>th</sup> work package of the VALITEST project aims at developing guidelines on a horizontal approach allowing the laboratories to undertake proficiency testing (PT) without having to participate in proficiency tests for all the tests they use.</p>
<p>A range of data has been collected using three different approaches, i) the study of accreditation scopes of some laboratories involved in diagnostics, ii) a workshop with diagnostic experts, iii) a survey sent to laboratories listed in the EPPO database on diagnostic expertise. The data collected allow a better understanding of the expectations of laboratories, of what they would consider as acceptable and of the applicability of the horizontal proficiency testing approach.</p>
<p>According to the data collected, a PT plan should be conducted over 3 to 4 years. Each year a single PT should be organized per field. It could contain several pests, however, to limit the workload no more than 3 tests should have to be performed on a maximum of 10 samples. The PT should include whenever possible the different pests included in the scope of accreditation of the laboratories, but also emerging pests. The pests to consider as a priority have been identified. PT samples should be as similar as possible to routine samples, ideally different matrices should be included in each PT. Among the different factors determining the reliability of a test, the design of the PT plan should especially focus on human factors (i.e. the proficiency of the staff to use the different techniques). The laboratories do not wish to spend more than 3 500 € per year for a service providing proficiency tests covering all their needs.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564889
oai:zenodo.org:5564889
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564888
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
horizontal approach
PT
plant health
VALITEST - D5.1 Analysis of the needs of the laboratories and applicability of the horizontal proficiency testing approach
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5564969
2021-10-13T12:20:52Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Boutron N.
Mc Mullen M.
Petter F.
2019-02-28
<p>The EPPO Database on Diagnostic expertise (<a href="http://dc.eppo.int/index.php">http://dc.eppo.int/index.php</a>) includes a specific section on validation (<a href="http://dc.eppo.int/validationlist.php">http://dc.eppo.int/validationlist.php</a>). Laboratories can deposit online validation data that they have generated on specific tests and these can be made visible to all users of the database. The validation data can then be retrieved from the database in the form of a PDF file including the description of the test evaluated (pest x matrix x method) and the performance data related to the test (the information is presented in a harmonized format). There is currently no possibility to sort the data except by pest and method.</p>
<p>One of the objectives of VALITEST is to improve the searching capacity of the database to ensure optimal use. In order to evaluate the needs of users a survey was organized, and the results of this survey are presented in this deliverable. These results will be used to identify and plan future IT developments necessary to establish the new features of the validation section. The new version of the EPPO Database on diagnostic expertise will be launched at the end of the VALITEST project. </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564969
oai:zenodo.org:5564969
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564968
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
needs inventory
validation section
plant health
VALITEST - D6.2 Survey on the needs of users of the EPPO Database and exploitation of the data
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5561020
2021-10-13T12:40:20Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Alič Š.
Anthoine G.
Chabirand A.
Chappé AM.
Dreo T.
Laurenson L.
Lukežič T.
Mehle N.
Mouaziz H.
Pirc M.
Ravnikar M.
Tomlinson J.
Westenberg M.
2020-02-11
<p>The aim of deliverable 1.1. is to prepare criteria to select tests for validation and to select laboratories for TPS (test performance study). Criteria for selection of tests for the TPS for each pest have been set (see Tables 7-12). These criteria have been divided in five groups: 1) validation data, 2) applicability, 3) protocols, 4) chemicals and 5) equipment. For selection of participants for the TPS selection criteria have also been set (see Table 13). Amongst the most important criteria for selection for participants of TPS are technical expertise for the pest group and the method, authorization to work with the specific pest and that the participating laboratory has quality assurance in place. These criteria enable evaluation of whether participants are proficient to perform the tests, have the necessary equipment and a permit to work with viable regulated organism. The scope of the testing for specific pests was set and common rules for each selection process was defined.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5561020
oai:zenodo.org:5561020
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5561019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
selection criteria
test performance study
plant health
Erwinia amylowora
Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii
plum pox virus
citrus tristeza virus
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Fusarium circinatum
pest
VALITEST - D1.1 Report detailing the minimum performance parameters to select tests for validation and selection of laboratories for TPS
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:7143215
2022-10-05T12:13:20Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Brostaux Y.
Chabirand A.
Lebas B.
Massart S.
2021-12-17
<p>These guidelines describe a new and improved approach to analyse and report data of validation studies and inter-laboratory comparisons studies (i.e. test performance studies) for integration in the appropriate EPPO standards (i.e. PM 7/98 (2019) and PM 7/122 (2014)). The proposed methods of analysis including statistical methods, have been tested on the 10 data sets obtained from the test performance studies conducted in the framework of VALITEST (as part of Work package 1). This new approach uses, wherever possible and whenever applicable, statistical methods recommended by international standards with examples of their application to plant health diagnostic tests. This approach is a consensus agreement between VALITEST members.</p>
<p>The analysis, presentation and interpretation of data are presented using data based on a real data set of a test performance study conducted by VALITEST (as part of Work package 1). It has been written in a simple manner for diagnostician with limited knowledge in statistics. More advanced statistical explanation are provided in Annexes.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7143215
oai:zenodo.org:7143215
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7143214
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
test performance study
statistical analysis
plant health
VALITEST - D2.1 Guidelines for the revision of the EPPO Standards PM 7/98 and PM 7/122 for validation studies (including Test Performance Studies)
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5564904
2021-10-14T01:48:35Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Rolland M.
Mc Mullen M.
Petter F.
2020-12-17
<p>The 5<sup>th</sup> work package of the VALITEST project aimed at developing guidelines on a horizontal approach allowing the laboratories to undertake proficiency testing (PT) without having to participate in proficiency tests for all the tests they use.</p>
<p>After identifying the needs and expectations of the laboratories, the acceptability of this approach has been discussed with representatives of an accreditation body. According to them, the views of experts collected previously do not constitute a sufficient level of evidence and the suitability of the approach should be demonstrated based on the analysis of proficiency testing results. Based on existing datasets it was possible to draw some conclusions but not to demonstrate the suitability of the approach.</p>
<p>The most appropriate approach identified to limit the PT participation plan is to group the tests and evaluate the proficiency for these groups as described by the European guidance document EA-4/18. However, the identification of the groups of tests can only be done by the laboratory itself taking into account all its specific parameters. As a follow-up to the work carried out within VALITEST, a case study will be developed to accompany the EA-4/18 guidance document and facilitate the implementation of this approach by laboratories.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564904
oai:zenodo.org:5564904
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564903
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
horizontal approach
PT
plant health
VALITEST - D5.2 Guidelines on an approach to undertake horizontal proficiency testing
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5565010
2021-10-13T12:22:12Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Boutron N.
Mc Mullen M.
Petter F.
2018-10-30
<p>Task 6.3: Improvement of the validation section of the free access EPPO Database on diagnostic expertise.</p>
<p>This report summarises the inventory of validation data performed for the 6 pests included in the first Test performance study (TPS). The validation reports collected will be entered in the EPPO Database on diagnostic expertise (validation section).</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5565010
oai:zenodo.org:5565010
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5565009
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
validation reports
EPPO database
plant health
VALITEST - D6.3 Inventory of validation data available
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5561846
2021-10-13T12:06:43Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Anthoine G.
Brittain I.
Chabirand A.
Dreo T.
Faggioli F.
Gueniau M.
Harrison C.
Luigi M.
Lukežič T.
Mehle N.
Mezzalama M.
Mouaziz H.
Ravnikar M.
Renvoisé JP.
Spadaro D.
Tomassoli L.
Vučurović A.
2020-01-31
<p>A list of methods and tests for validation for test performance study (TPS) Round 2 (for laboratory and/or on-site use) was prepared for six selected pests: <em>Xanthomonas citri</em> pv. <em>citri</em>, <em>Xylophilus ampelinus</em>, <em>Cryphonectria parasitica</em>, tomato spotted wilt tospovirus, tomato brown rugose fruit virus and plum pox virus. The listed tests were first validated in preliminary studies by TPS organizers in order to select the final tests for TPS, based on the scope and criteria also described in this deliverable.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5561846
oai:zenodo.org:5561846
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5561845
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
test performance study
plant health
Xanthomonas citri pv. citri
Xylophilus ampelinus
Cryphonectria parasitica
tomato spotted wilt tospovirus
tomato brown rugose fruit virus
plum pox virus
pest
VALITEST - D1.3 List of tests for validation - Round 2
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5564569
2021-10-14T01:48:30Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Chappé AM.
Chabirand A.
Dahlin P.
de Krom C.
Dreo T.
Gentit P.
Laurenson L.
Petter F.
Spadaro D.
Trontin C.
van Diepeningen AD.
van der Vlugt R.
van Veen E.
Westenberg M.
2019-11-19
<p>A general standard operating procedure (SOP) for the production of reference material (RM) for use in plant health diagnostics was developed within the VALITEST project. The general SOP was designed based on information on existing SOPs and guidelines available with the consortium partners (Deliverable 3.2) and partly incorporates the quality criteria for reference material (Deliverable 3.1). The general SOP describes the different steps required in the production process, ranging from the different possible sources of the reference material, tests to confirm its identity, possibly required multiplication steps to the actual production process. For each step in the process, criteria and critical points can be identified, but they will depend on the nature of the RM and on the target test in which the RM will be used.</p>
<p>The original Deliverable 3.2 (February 2019) was evaluated by all partners (Milestone 3.4 Evaluation report) and updated towards this new version. The updated general standard operating procedure (SOP) for the production of reference material (RM) includes a stand-alone version of a template for the production of RM (Annex I) and an example of a full SOP for the production of RM of <em>Fusarium circinatum</em> to be used in (Real-Time) PCR assays (Annex II).</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564569
oai:zenodo.org:5564569
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564568
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
RM
validation studies
plant health
VALITEST - D3.3 Guidelines and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) finalised for the production of the reference materials
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5566321
2021-10-14T01:48:31Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Gianinazzi C.
Larocca F.
2020-11-30
<p>The deliverable 7.2 describes the strategy developed to ensure the appropriate exploitation of the outputs of the VALITEST project (Validation of diagnostic tests to support plant health). The deliverable D7.2 details VALITEST exploitation potential and how project partners, end-users and stakeholders can benefit from the final results of the project. The exploitation strategy is directly connected to deliverable D6.4. Dissemination and training plan.</p>
<p>A final version will be provided in the D6.9-“Final plan for the Dissemination and Exploitation of project Results (PDER)”.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566321
oai:zenodo.org:5566321
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566320
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
dissemination
exploitable results
plant health
VALITEST - D7.2 Communication and Exploitation strategy plans
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5653286
2021-11-09T11:07:14Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Petter F.
Trontin C.
2021-08-30
<p>This deliverable presents the training activities organized in the framework of the VALITEST project. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the physical workshops planned for diagnostic laboratories could not be organised. All the training activities were held online in the format of webinars, practical training sessions and videos. Three series of activities covering different topics were organised: one on the concept of test validation in plant health, one on TPS organisation and one on the use and validation of High Throughput sequencing (HTS) tests for diagnostics of plant pests. The participation to those series and satisfaction of the participants are also described in this deliverable.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653286
oai:zenodo.org:5653286
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653285
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
education
test performance study
concept of validation
HTS
plant health
VALITEST - D6.8 Report on the organisation of training activities (webinars, video tutorial, practical training sessions)
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5562337
2021-10-13T12:43:21Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Chappé AM.
Chabirand A.
Dahlin P.
de Krom C.
Dreo T.
Gentit P.
Laurenson L.
Petter F.
Spadaro D.
van der Vlugt R.
van Veen E.
Westenberg M.
2020-02-11
<p>A list of general minimum criteria was developed to be used in preparation of reference materials to be used in interlaboratory testing, including validations through test performance studies. The list was based on previously identified criteria in standards including ISO standards, EPPO guidelines, deliverables of relevant projects, related fields, and own experience of project partners. Several additional criteria were proposed: ‘availability’, ‘purity’ and ‘commutability’. These criteria result from a series of discussions, taking into account previous work and relevant international standards. Where relevant, each criterion was first defined as a series of levels from the highest to lowest ranking with the lowest ranking considered to be the minimum. Depending on the intended use, the reference material may need to fulfil higher levels of selected criteria or some criteria may not be relevant at all. The criteria were tested by the organizers of the TPS in round 1 of validation within VALITEST project which include bacteria, viruses, nematodes and fungi. The systematic and structured approach of describing RMs was found to be useful in promoting transparent descriptions of the RMs used and comparability of TPSs, as well as a step toward implementing FAIR data principles. The criteria defined here are applicable, potentially with minor modification, beyond the scope of this deliverable and project to other pests and other uses of RMs. A list of general minimum criteria was developed to be used in preparation of reference materials to be used in interlaboratory testing, including validations through test performance studies. The list was based on previously identified criteria in standards including ISO standards, EPPO guidelines, deliverables of relevant projects, related fields, and own experience of project partners. Several additional criteria were proposed: ‘availability’, ‘purity’ and ‘commutability’. These criteria result from a series of discussions, taking into account previous work and relevant international standards. Where relevant, each criterion was first defined as a series of levels from the highest to lowest ranking with the lowest ranking considered to be the minimum. Depending on the intended use, the reference material may need to fulfil higher levels of selected criteria or some criteria may not be relevant at all. The criteria were tested by the organizers of the TPS in round 1 of validation within VALITEST project which include bacteria, viruses, nematodes and fungi. The systematic and structured approach of describing RMs was found to be useful in promoting transparent descriptions of the RMs used and comparability of TPSs, as well as a step toward implementing FAIR data principles. The criteria defined here are applicable, potentially with minor modification, beyond the scope of this deliverable and project to other pests and other uses of RMs.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5562337
oai:zenodo.org:5562337
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5562336
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
RM
criteria inventory
interlaboratory testing
plant health
VALITEST - D3.1 List of the criteria the reference materials have to meet for use in validation studies
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5566304
2021-10-14T01:48:32Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Gianinazzi C.
Larocca F.
2019-12-13
<p>The results exploitation plan presents the objectives of the exploitation plan and the tools provided to ensure that the objectives will be met.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566304
oai:zenodo.org:5566304
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566303
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
guidelines
exploitable results
plant health
VALITEST - D7.1 Results exploitation plan
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5712892
2021-11-19T13:48:49Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Anthoine G.
Brittain I.
Chabirand A.
Dreo T.
Faggioli F.
Harrison C.
Luigi M.
Lukežič T.
Matić S.
Mehle N.
Mezzalama M.
Mouaziz H.
Ravnikar M.
Renvoisé JP.
Spadaro D.
Tomassoli L.
Vučurović A.
2021-10-28
<p>The aim of the deliverable 1.5. is to present a summary of the results obtained in the Round 2 of the test performance studies (TPS) organized by WP1 on six prioritized pests. Tests selection for each TPS was conducted following the “Common rules for selection of tests for TPS” and based on the “Weighted criteria for selection of tests for TPS”, both described in deliverable D1.1 (Minimum performance parameters to select tests for validation and selection of laboratories for TPS), while the list of selected tests for each TPS is available and explained in deliverable D1.3 (List of tests for validation - Round 2). TPS participants were selected following the “Common rules for selection of participants for TPS” and based on the “Criteria for selection of participants of TPS”, also both described in deliverable D1.1. For each of the six TPSs, the methodology used to perform the tests, the results of preliminary studies to select the tests, the results of the TPS and their thorough analysis and interpretation are described in corresponding TPS reports (supplementary information available upon request under confidentiality agreement). The validation data obtained during the six TPSs will be available in the validation section of the EPPO database on the diagnostic expertise. Main outcomes for each of the TPSs are highlighted as well as difficulties noticed during the organization process, which will improve organization of the future studies in the field of plant pests.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5712892
oai:zenodo.org:5712892
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5712891
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
test performance study
validation data
plant health
Xanthomonas citri pv. citri
Xylophilus ampelinus
Cryphonectria parasitica
tomato spotted wilt tospovirus
tomato brown rugose fruit virus
plum pox virus
pest
VALITEST - D1.5 TPS reports with description of the method, materials and software used, as well as the data analysis - Round 2
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5785647
2021-12-16T13:48:48Z
openaire_data
user-valitest
user-eu
Agstner, Barbara
Jones, Glyn
2021-12-16
<p>Data collected in the framework of work package 4 of the Valitest project. They correspond to a qualitative assessment of plant health stakeholder requirements, have been collected using online surveys supplemented by desk-based research, as well as impact assessments</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5785647
oai:zenodo.org:5785647
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5785646
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
pests prioritization
test performance study
plant health
Data on plant health stakeholder priorities for tests and general prioritisation framework
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
oai:zenodo.org:5785669
2021-12-16T13:48:48Z
openaire_data
user-valitest
user-eu
Rolland, Mathieu
2021-12-16
<p>Data collected in the framework of work package 5 of the Valitest project. They correspond to the needs and expectation concerning proficiency assessment expressed by plant health laboratories during a survey conducted online in 2019.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5785669
oai:zenodo.org:5785669
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5785668
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
horizontal approach
PT
plant health
Needs of plant health laboratories and applicability of the horizontal proficiency testing approach based on the questionnaire answers
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
oai:zenodo.org:5566185
2021-10-14T01:48:36Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Boutron N.
Giovani B.
McMullen M.
Pagano G.
Petter F.
2020-02-11
<p>This deliverable presents the fact sheet, flyer and poster developed to disseminate the project activities. This deliverable presents the fact sheet, flyer and poster developed to disseminate the project activities. </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566185
oai:zenodo.org:5566185
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566184
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
project documentation
plant health
VALITEST - D6.5 Information materials (project fact-sheet, flyers, poster)
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5566471
2021-10-14T01:48:35Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Rolland M.
2019-11-27
<p>VALITEST data will follow the “<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/open-access-data-management/data-management_en.htm"><em>FAIR</em></a>” principles, meaning “<em>Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable</em>”). The data will be made findable and accessible within the Consortium, and to the broader research community, stakeholders and policy makers. Also, data will be compliant with national and European ethic-legal frameworks, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679). The present data management plan (DMP) describes the data management life cycle for all data to be collected, processed and/or generated by the project. It includes information on the handling of research data both during and after the end of the project; the nature of the data, the methodology and standards applied, whether data will be shared or provided in open access, and how the data will be curated and preserved.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566471
oai:zenodo.org:5566471
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566470
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
DMP
guidelines
plant health
VALITEST - D8.3 Data Management Plan - Version 2
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5562197
2021-10-13T12:09:14Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Alič Š.
Anthoine G.
Brittain I.
Chabirand A.
Chappé AM.
Dreo T.
Gueniau M.
Harrison C.
Jakomin T.
Laurenson L.
Lukežič T.
Mehle N.
Metz-Verschure E.
Mouaziz H.
Oorspronk J.
Pirc M.
Ravnikar M.
Raaymakers T.
te Braak N.
Tomlinson J.
Vučurović A.
Westenberg M.
2020-04-30
<p>The aim of the deliverable 1.4. is to present a summary of the results obtained in the Round 1 of the test performance studies (TPS) organized by WP1 on six prioritized pests. Tests selection for each TPS was conducted following the “Common rules for selection of tests for TPS” and based on the “Weighted criteria for selection of tests for TPS”, both described in deliverable D1.1, while the list of selected tests for each TPS is available and explained in deliverable D1.2. TPS participants were selected following the “Common rules for selection of participants for TPS” and based on the “Criteria for selection of participants of TPS”, also both described in deliverable D1.1. For each of the six TPSs, the methodology used to perform the tests, the results of preliminary studies to select the tests, the results of the TPS and their thorough analysis and interpretation are described in corresponding TPS reports (supplementary information available upon request under confidentiality agreement). The validation data obtained during the six TPSs will be available in the validation section of the EPPO database on the diagnostic expertise. Main outcomes for each of the TPSs are highlighted as well as difficulties noticed during the organization process, which will improve organization of the following studies in the Round 2.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5562197
oai:zenodo.org:5562197
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5562196
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
test performance study
validation data
plant health
Erwinia amylowora
Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii
plum pox virus
citrus tristeza virus
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Fusarium circinatum
pest
VALITEST - D1.4 TPS reports with description of the method, materials and software used, as well as the data analysis - Round 1
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5566265
2021-10-14T01:48:36Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Broeders L.
Mc Mullen M.
Petter F.
Rolland M.
2021-02-18
<p>The 5th work package of the VALITEST project aimed at developing guidelines on a horizontal approach allowing the laboratories to undertake proficiency testing (PT) without having to participate in proficiency tests for all the tests they use.<br>
As a follow-up to the work carried out within this work-package, a case study has been developed to accompany the EA-4/18 guidance document. It aims at facilitating the implementation of the approach presented in the EA guidance document by laboratories working in the field of plant health.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566265
oai:zenodo.org:5566265
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566264
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
horizontal approach
PT
plant health
guidelines
proficiency test
VALITEST - Supplementary document to deliverable 5.2 - Plant health case study developed to accompany the EA-4/18 guidance document
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5562423
2021-10-13T12:12:48Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Chappé AM.
Chabirand A.
Dahlin P.
de Krom C.
Dreo T.
Gentit P.
Laurenson L.
Petter F.
Spadaro D.
van Diepeningen AD.
van der Vlugt R.
van Veen E.
Westenberg M.
2019-03-04
<p>A general standard operating procedure (SOP) for the production of reference material (RM) for use in plant health diagnostics was developed. The general SOP was designed based on (limited) information on existing SOPs and guidelines available with the consortium partners. The general SOP describes the different steps required in the production process, ranging from the different possible sources of the reference material, tests to confirm its identity, possibly required multiplication steps to the actual production process. For each step in the process, criteria and critical points are identified. The criteria that reference material has to meet, and their minimum required levels as identified and described in Deliverable 3.1 of WP3 form an import basis of the final production process.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5562423
oai:zenodo.org:5562423
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5562422
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
RM
validation studies
plant health
VALITEST - D3.2 Development of draft Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) available for the production of the reference materials identified in Task 3.1
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5566422
2021-10-14T01:48:31Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Rolland M.
2018-10-30
<p>VALITEST data will follow the “<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/open-access-data-management/data-management_en.htm"><em>FAIR</em></a>” principles, meaning “<em>Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable</em>”). The data will be made findable and accessible within the Consortium, and to the broader research community, stakeholders and policy makers. Also, data will be compliant with national and European ethic-legal frameworks, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679). The present data management plan (DMP) describes the data management life cycle for all data to be collected, processed and/or generated by the project. It includes information on the handling of research data both during and after the end of the project; the nature of the data, the methodology and standards applied, whether data will be shared or provided in open access, and how the data will be curated and preserved.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566422
oai:zenodo.org:5566422
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566421
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
DMP
guidelines
plant health
VALITEST - D8.1 Data Management Plan
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5566448
2021-10-14T01:48:32Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Anthoine G.
Rolland M.
Mouaziz H.
Ravnikar M.
Westenberg M.
Massart S.
van der Vlugt R.
Agstner B.
Jones G.
Petter F.
Trontin C.
Gianinazzi C.
2020-02-11
<p>The VALITEST technical periodic report M1-M18 details the work carried out by the partners and overviews the progress of the tasks as described in the Description of Actions (DoA) during the first reporting period M1-M18 (May 2018-October 2019).</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566448
oai:zenodo.org:5566448
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5566447
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
progress overview
performed work
plant health
VALITEST - D8.2 Technical periodic report M1-M18
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5564939
2021-10-14T01:48:36Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Boutron N.
Petter F.
Mc Mullen M.
Giovani B.
Griessinger D.
2018-09-14
<p>The website constitutes a key communication tool in order to increase the project visibility and to share knowledge and information about the project. It is the most important and immediate point of reference for all target audiences. The website was published at the end of July 2018 (M 3).</p>
<p>The VALITEST website Url is: https://www.valitest.eu/</p>
<p>It contains all relevant information about the project (project objectives, information, news, event announcements, public reports and analysis).</p>
<p>The website also hosts a reserved area dedicated to internal communication and a collaborative platform.</p>
<p>The social media buttons (Twitter and Flickr) are inserted to guarantee constant connection with the VALITEST social media account.</p>
<p>The website will be regularly updated and improved with all the news about the project, including its outcomes, events, interviews, official articles and publications.</p>
<p>Screenshots are presented.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564939
oai:zenodo.org:5564939
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564938
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
communication
information
plant health
VALITEST - D6.1 Project website and social media accounts
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5564619
2021-10-14T01:48:32Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Agstner B.
Jones G.
2019-12-12
<p>Main aim of work-package 4 is a better understanding of the demands for current and future testing options. This is to be achieved via a qualitative assessment of stakeholder requirements using online surveys supplemented by desk-based research, as well as impact assessments. To make the most of work-package 4 and to ensure that Test Performance Study (TPS) targets are determined considering the latest developments in demand, it was decided - prior to the project start - to use the results from the stakeholder survey for prioritising target pests. This also reflects the importance of co-design and the multi-actor approach, which are central to this project. Deliverable 4.1 reports on identified stakeholder priorities for tests as well as the general prioritisation framework, which was created in collaboration with all affected work-packages. After applying the framework to the long list of target pests obtained through the surveys, the selection of pests for TPS round 2 was the following: Arabis mosaic virus, <em>Cryphonectria parasitica</em>, <em>Melampsora medusa</em>, Plum pox virus, Tobacco ringspot virus, Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus, Tomato ringspot virus, Tomato spotted wilt virus, <em>Xanthomonas citri pv citri</em>, <em>Xylophilus ampelinus</em>. Of those the following have been selected: <em>Cryphonectria parasitica </em>(UNITO), Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (CREA), Plum pox virus (ANSES), Tomato spotted wilt virus (NIB), <em>Xanthomonas citri pv citri </em>(ANSES), <em>Xylophilus ampelinus </em>(FERA).</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564619
oai:zenodo.org:5564619
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5564618
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
pests prioritization
test performance study
plant health
VALITEST - D4.1 Report on stakeholder priorities for tests and general prioritization framework
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:7113284
2022-09-26T14:26:36Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Lebas Bénédicte
Massart Sébastien
2020-12-16
<p>These guidelines provide recommendations on the process of selection, development, validation and verification of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) tests and the quality assurance for their routine use as diagnostic tests in plant health laboratories. These guidelines are general to enable a broad application in all plant health fields with appropriate flexibility to account for the changes of technologies.</p>
<p>The guidelines cover all steps from sample collection to reporting including risk analysis, test selection/test development, test validation/verification, quality checks to ensure the validity of the results, confirmation of the detection and interpretation of biological relevance within a quality management system. Furthermore, these guidelines provide an overview of the HTS technologies and their applications in plant health.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7113284
oai:zenodo.org:7113284
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7113283
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
HTS
high-throughput sequencing
plant health
VALITEST - D2.2 "Best practice" guidelines for validation and routine use of non-targeted techniques in diagnostic setting which could serve as a basis for a new EPPO Standard
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:5653347
2021-11-09T11:07:11Z
user-valitest
user-eu
Petter, F.
Trontin, C.
Gianinazzi, C.
2021-09-30
<p>This document describes the final strategy developed to ensure the appropriate dissemination and exploitation of the outputs of the VALITEST project (Validation of diagnostic tests to support plant health). It presents the objectives of the dissemination and exploitation strategy, the tools used to ensure the dissemination of VALITEST outputs and the training activities organized in the framework of VALITEST. It also details VALITEST exploitation potential and how project partners, end-users and stakeholders can benefit from the final results of the project.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653347
oai:zenodo.org:5653347
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/valitest
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653346
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
communication
exploitable results
plant health
VALITEST - D6.9 Final Plan for the Dissemination and Exploitation of project Results (PDER)
info:eu-repo/semantics/report