2024-03-28T12:38:01Z
https://zenodo.org/oai2d
oai:zenodo.org:8363732
2023-09-20T14:27:02Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
AQUALIA
2023-05-24
<p>News article in Spanish produced by AQUALIA.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8363732
oai:zenodo.org:8363732
spa
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/News%20article/20230524C.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8363731
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
WSIS
Industrial Symbiosis
Circular Economy
Water Recovery
Lleida, en un projecte europeu per recuperar recursos com l'aigua en processos industrials
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
oai:zenodo.org:8251541
2023-08-16T14:26:47Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
KWR
2021-12-15
<p>The ULTIMATE Young Professional programme has launched to drive knowledge sharing and support career growth, under Europe's circular economy programme.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8251541
oai:zenodo.org:8251541
eng
Zenodo
https://www.waterworld.com/water-utility-management/press-release/14222379/new-network-to-help-unite-europes-young-water-professionals
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8251540
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
WSIS
Water Smart
Water Reuse
Water Recycling
Young Professionals
New network to help unite Europe's young water professionals
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
oai:zenodo.org:8362522
2023-09-20T14:26:59Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Cecilia Bruni, Alessia Foglia, Anna Laura Eusebi*, Nicola Frison, Çağrı Akyol*, and Francesco Fatone
2021-09-30
<p>Anaerobic processes are proven to have much more environmental and economic benefits than conventional aerobic treatment systems, offering sustainable energy and valuable biochemicals. In recent years, bio-based volatile fatty acid (VFA) production has come into prominence as more value is derived before ending up with other final products. This paper presents a critical review of the research studies on bio-based VFA production from different waste streams (i.e., industrial sludge/waste, organic fraction of municipal solid waste/food waste, municipal wastewater/sludge, combined streams) through anaerobic fermentation. Fundamentals and decisive process parameters (i.e., pH, temperature, retention time, organic loading rate) are reviewed, and their correlations with VFA yields are critically discussed based on 178 cases (156 lab- and 22 pilot-scale). The picture we provided clearly demonstrates that process parameters should be clearly defined and optimized according to the type of waste streams which may have a significant impact on downstream processes in most cases.</p>
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02195
oai:zenodo.org:8362522
eng
Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02195
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Bio-based
Fermentation
Process parameters
Resource recovery
Sewage sludge
Volatile fatty acid
Targeted Bio-Based Volatile Fatty Acid Production from Waste Streams through Anaerobic Fermentation: Link between Process Parameters and Operating Scale
info:eu-repo/semantics/review
oai:zenodo.org:8060239
2023-06-20T14:26:49Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Wendy Ann Mansilla
Andrew Perkis
2023-06-20
<p>This deliverable 3.3, playbook comes from Task 3.1 (Immersive experiences in multi use play spaces) and provides a citizen participation playbook with instructions, protocols and guidelines for designing and implementing the immersive experience1.<br>
The outcome will be a playbook for stakeholder engagement to be implemented in Task 3.2 (Business-to-business engagement) and 3.3 (Citizen engagement). ULTIMATE`s playbook bring together designers, strategist, developers and the citizens from various backgrounds as a team who can use the ULTIMATE playbook as an engagement tool. The playbook is useful in a team setting and aims to integrate knowledge dissemination in ULTIMATE`s case studies and lead them on how to start the stakeholder engagement process. The playbook will help the case studies and partners start conversations around complex topics that are hard to grasp at first thereby closing the differences and gaps that exist in a multi-stakeholder collaboration practice.<br>
This will make it possible to design and implement the stakeholder engagement for the use case studies CS2 (NL), CS3 (IT), and CS9 (DK). The playbook will be used in D3.6 for validating developed immersive narratives for citizens. Validation will measure the success of the approaches we co-created and implemented and will come in the form of perceived quality of experience which is a subjective measure.<br>
The developed playbook support stakeholders and citizens co-creation process in the ULTIMATE project. This is implemented through scoping their questions, identifying relevant community concerns, planning an effective action and prototyping it to test its impact with the users before development. The playbook will guide them to gather data and evidence, interpret their findings, and develop better understanding of the community and their needs. This will allow them to formulate a design that will lead to a tangible outcome – an immersive experience.</p>
<p>Method<br>
We have formulated a citizen participation playbook with instructions, protocols and guidelines for designing and implementing the immersive experience drawn from our years of experience in co-creation with communities and development of an immersive narrative experience in public spaces.<br>
Since 2016, NTNU have been collaborating with diverse team of artists, scientists, researchers, designers and architects working on tools related to the concepts of multi-use playspaces2, place by design and immersive narrative experiences. We have implemented all these concepts in public spaces in Trondheim and on a EU project called +CityxChange3. We have also examined several local intervention sites in connection to the use of tools for engaging communities and have successfully co-created installations and interventions using art, science, and technology.<br>
As a Work Package 3 (WP3) team lead, we selected three use case studies (CS2, CS3 and CS9) that will validate the playbook. We also examined the transactions, activities, potential players and of the case studies so we can decide on the appropriate tools to adopt or use. We revisited the lessons we learned from our previous experiences in the co-creation process and in our implementations of multi-use playspaces, place by design and immersive narrative experiences to provide a new dimension in solving challenges in stakeholder engagements applied in a water-oriented world. Selected tools from our best practices were adopted and tested through internal workshops with our diverse team of artists, scientists, researchers, designers and architects at our Sense-IT4 Lab at NTNU. We use a Human-centred design thinking in our formulation of tools and methodologies in the current Playbook. The result of our case study co-creation process will impact the final outcome and legacy of the D3.3 ULTIMATE Playbook.</p>
<p>Conclusion<br>
This report presents a citizen participation playbook with instructions, protocols and guidelines for co-creating the design and initial prototype in the development an immersive narrative intervention.<br>
This deliverable covers the first version of the two playbooks that we are distributing within the ULTIMATE project. It covers 7 stages of co-creation framework: 1. Plan; 2. Understand; 3. Imagine, 4. Reflect, 5. Build, 6. Analyse, 7. Legacy. The first 4 stages: Plan, Understand, Imagine and the first part of Reflect will be validated in the first quarter of 2022. The remaining stages will be validated during the second and third quarter of 2022. To fully realise and validate the playbook as a viable tool, it must be put into practice. D3.3 is highly interlinked with the results of D3.4, which validates the current playbook during the use case study co-creation practice. The formulation of the final version of the playbook will require adaptation based on the outcome of the co-creation process in our case studies.<br>
To fully realise and validate the playbook as a viable tool, it must be put into practice. The playbook as a tool can relatively save time, cost and resources of the public in terms of implementation. Ensuring transparent and creative co-creation with citizens and stakeholders may require a bit more time investments and this playbook ensures flexible, time effective, and impactful implementation. It also enhances the goodwill, trust and influence that the community earn or build up with the public through the pursuit of solutions to concerns that people need.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060239
oai:zenodo.org:8060239
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D3.3_ULTIMATE_Playbook%20.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060238
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Water Recovery
Water Recycling
Water Reuse
Immersive Experiences
Multi-use play spaces
Stakeholder Engagement
Citizen Engagement
Playbook
Immersive narrative experience
Place by Design Playbook
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8060480
2023-06-25T14:26:51Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Wendy Ann Mansilla
Andrew Perkis
Stefania Munaretto
Lisa Andrews
Caro Mooren
2022-11-30
<p>This deliverable 3.4 “Protocol and tools for business-to-business co-creation” was developed within Task 3.2 (B2B engagement) and involves subtask 3.2.1 (CoP) and subtask 3.2.2 (Co-creation). The Deliverable will provide the protocol and tools for business-to-business co-creation in ULTIMATE, and explain the process used of how the protocol and tools are selected and designed. We have two distinctly different protocols we will use; co-creation action and communities of practice (CoP).</p>
<p>Co-creation is a collaborative process where experts’ work closely with local people, end-users and stakeholders using methods, tools and protocols to propose, discuss and prototype new actions and solutions to relevant issues. Following a co-creation process, a compilation of documents with suggestions for future actions is drafted to provide an early prototype needed for future development of a service, action, or an intervention and to begin conversations with decision-makers. Our co-creation action involves local citizens and relevant stakeholders in the engagement process in our chosen three case studies (CS): CS2, CS3, and CS9. The selection process of the three CSs is described in this deliverable. CoPs do not involve the public, but sector and site-specific stakeholders on the technical and political elements of the nine ULTIMATE case studies.</p>
<p>The methodologies and tools that has been proven to achieve best results in our cocreation practice with the three CSs (CS2, CS3, and CS9) will be presented as a best practice in T3.3 (citizen engagement) and with results reported in D3.5 (results and insights from co-creation exercises in ULTIMATE CS, M30). We will use the final output of the co-creation to develop an immersive narrative intervention or action in D3.6 (validated and analysed immersive narratives for citizens, M46).</p>
<p>Conclusion<br>
This report presents our approaches in co-creation. We have also outlined the processes, methodologies, and tools used for business-to-business co-creation within the ULTIMATE CSs using two best practices:</p>
<p>1. Co-creation leading to an immersive experience1 using tools such as: the onboarding kit, facilitator’s slidedeck and the ULTIMATE’s playbook.</p>
<p>2. CoP using tools such as stakeholder identification theories, best practices from previous projects, and CoP monitoring and evaluation theory and techniques.</p>
<p>We expect any co-creation action to require flexibility and adaptation based on what the CSs want to achieve, and on what happens on the process of doing it. All the tools we have provided to our CSs and their participants/stakeholders are considered best practices, but response of the receivers is expected to vary and may require adaptations of the proposed solutions. Making successful innovative practice and change may also require both social and political advocacy, which is beyond our scope in this deliverable.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060480
oai:zenodo.org:8060480
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D3.4%20ULTIMATE%20Protocols%20and%20Tools%20for%20B2B%20Co-creation.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060479
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
Water Recovery
Water Recycling
Water Reuse
Augmented Reality
Business to Business
Community of Practice
Virtual Reality
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Co-creation
Protocols and Tools for Business-to-Business Co-creation
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8073107
2023-06-25T14:27:02Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Heidi Rapp Nilsen
Daniel Goodwin
Marine Poncet
Heather Smith
May Thorseth
Stef Koop
2021-06-30
<p>In this white paper, we dive into the moral and ethical drivers and motivations to adopt Circular Economy (CE) practices. What’s more, we characterise the societal expectations and reflect on the level of influence that these societal expectations may have in adopting CE practices. We focus on a specific niche in the CE system - the role of water. Wastewater can be considered a largely untapped resource that can provide a major contribution to tackling challenges of water and resource scarcity, pollution and climate change while creating and maintaining vital services, economic growth and employment. More specifically, we consider the role of wastewater as a reusable resource and as a vector for energy and materials to be extracted, treated, stored and reused within an industrial context. This is ‘Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis’ (WSIS). The original title of the deliverable, as conceived in the grant agreement, “societal expectations and challenges around WSIS, and potential societal impacts of WSIS adoption” has been revised to make it more concise and to align it with the shift in emphasis towards moral and ethical drivers.</p>
<p>In this white paper, we examine two intertwined aspects of the transformation towards a CE:<br>
(i) Moral and ethical drivers and motivations for companies to adopt CE practices (with a particular focus on examples of WSIS);<br>
(ii) Societal expectations regarding the adoption of such CE practices.</p>
<p>Moral and ethical drivers are explored through the concepts of sustainability (within planetary boundaries), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). State-of-the-art research is presented concerning environmental and social boundaries, what constitutes a sustainable CE, and ways to interpret and address societal expectations. Due to both environmental and societal challenges, the main takeaway is that a CE is not a synonym for sustainability. A sustainable CE requires an understanding of the interlinkages between global challenges and regional problems. This white paper reflects on ways to increase the sustainability of firms and projects working towards a CE with reference to both regional situations and the broader geographical sphere.</p>
<p>CSR is a commonly applied concept, often loosely used to express and legitimise corporate practices, ambition, and identity. Yet, to contribute towards achieving a CE, CSR ambitions and practices require transparent communication, not only focusing on contributions but also highlighting limitations to and ways of improving circularity. A more comprehensive analysis and transparent reporting of how different practices contribute to a CE is essential to avoid potential greenwashing practices. In this way, companies need to be prepared to be held accountable for their CE and sustainability claims. Beyond the benefits of enhancing CE innovations and practices, such a strategy may help contribute to a firm's positive public image in the long run. Hence, one can argue that it is in the interest of the firms as well as society as a whole that corporate communications are specific about CE goals, practices, and the methods of evaluating progress within their CSR strategy.</p>
<p>RRI implies that researchers, citizens, policymakers, business and third sector organizations work together throughout the research and innovation process to better align both the process and its outcomes with the values, needs and expectations of society. RRI is compulsory in most projects financed by the EU’s H2020, including the ULTIMATE project. This promotion of RRI and its guiding principles can therefore act as a moral driver for companies and research to invest in novel public engagement and governance aspects of CE systems, particularly as part of their innovation processes.</p>
<p>Partners in ULTIMATE and other CE projects recognise a moral obligation to contribute to a sustainable CE. Nevertheless, there are pitfalls on the path towards a sustainable CE. We highlight specific challenges and trade-offs that become evident when considering the CE within environmental and social boundaries, which are both under pressure. CE practitioners, and ULTIMATE partners and stakeholders, in particular, can contribute to more meaningful outcomes if they are aware of potential mismatches between sustainability and CE principles. In this respect, there are two key points to take into account:<br>
<strong>- A CE does not necessarily reduce the extraction of raw materials, the use of energy or the consumption of materials. Overcoming resource scarcity requires a more comprehensive set of ambitions;<br>
- A CE that contributes to environmental sustainability, may reduce social sustainability. Such trade-offs can be better accounted for explicitly rather than implicitly.</strong></p>
<p>To enhance the sustainability of CE schemes, partners and firms have to consider these possible pitfalls and trade-offs. Through our investigation of CSR and RRI, we arrive at specific suggestions for reflection, which can be used to raise awareness on how to enhance the sustainability of a CE, by refining or modifying a project or an approach. Thus, the recommendations of this white paper can be exploited by the project partners, and outside ULTIMATE in relevant projects and policy spheres within the EU, as ex ante, intermediate and ex post assessment criteria for various CE initiatives, projects and programmes.</p>
<p>Alongside the conceptual discussions on moral and ethical drivers, this white paper presents the results of two national surveys undertaken in Spain and the United Kingdom (UK) where ULTIMATE demonstration cases are located. The surveys asked samples of the general public about their awareness of CE, social expectations for CE, alignment with four values perspectives and assessment of the legitimacy of CE systems. The surveys were supplemented by a small number of follow-up interviews in the UK. The results indicate that awareness of the CE terminology is limited among certain demographics (particularly older age groups in the UK), thus there are opportunities for improving awareness through tailored information and outreach campaigns. There is a general desire for companies to be both environmentally and socially responsible, which corresponds with the environmental and social values perspectives the majority of respondents were aligned with. The results also show a preference among many respondents for some level of government intervention in promoting the CE. However, although most respondents agreed with governments encouraging companies to adopt such systems, the level of agreement was less when it came to providing financial incentives, or for direct regulation. A willingness to pay more for circular products was moderate and, although there may be segments of the population that are willing to pay more, many will not (instead, perhaps, opting for lower prices or convenience). These points add value beyond ULTIMATE, as actors wishing to advance CE initiatives in different regions of the EU can use these results to guide their own investigations into societal expectations.</p>
<p>When considering CSR through the lens of organisational and technological legitimacy, our surveys and in-depth interviews indicate that CE systems have higher moral legitimacy. This means that CE systems are judged as the right thing to do and are more aligned with the social values of the respondents. Generalised examples of CE schemes were also evaluated as having a degree of cognitive legitimacy, which means that some respondents comprehend the key goals, mechanisms and urgency. However, respondents were less likely to agree that CE systems provide a personal benefit that encourages them to be involved, thus pragmatic legitimacy is observed to be the lowest of the three forms considered. These results indicate promising opportunities to support the legitimisation of CE systems by further exploiting existing levels of moral and cognitive legitimacy as well as exploring avenues to cultivate pragmatic legitimacy to help people be more involved in CE practices. In this respect, outreach and involvement activities can make a significant difference.</p>
<p>Through investigating the social expectations for CE in two EU countries, we are able to extrapolate to an EU level and suggest that there is potential to support citizens’ awareness of CE and WSIS concepts and to implement engagement strategies that will contribute to the broader legitimisation of CE. Furthermore, this document refers to specific EU policies and our recommendations may help the EU water sector in particular work towards these policy aims as well as contribute towards refining methods for how such policy aims can be met. For example, the Circular Economy Action Plan (European Commission, 2020a, ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/) aims for co-creating outcomes with multiple stakeholders, to which we contribute a fuller understanding of the expectations of citizens and recommendations for building legitimacy. Moreover, building on our findings relating to ethical drivers and social expectations for the CE, novel governance or public engagement processes used in ULTIMATE may, in turn, help inform future developments of EU policy such as public engagement or governance dimensions of RRI (European Commission, 2021, ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/node/766).</p>
<p><br>
In summary, the recommendations of this white paper have potential to be exploited by other workstreams and partners of the ULTIMATE project, as well as the wider landscape of organisations and policymakers looking to support the wider adoption of CE schemes in the EU (particularly relating to the water sector).</p>
<p>We argue that transformation towards a CE requires the establishment of WSIS. The process of putting WSIS into practice requires the development of new cognitive routines and technological trajectories (i.e. know-how) in the engineering community (core aim of WP1) and systematic technological and design interlinkages need to be established too (core aim of WP2). These interlinkages can be shaped by regulations and standards (task 4.2), new governance arrangements (task 4.3), but, perhaps primarily, by ambitions of both companies, policymakers and other stakeholders that are directly or indirectly involved. Hence, the moral-ethical drivers and societal expectations may form a focal point for innovative stakeholder engagement models in WP3, in particular for the business-to-business engagement in task 3.2, citizen engagement in task 3.3 and their interaction in the Living Labs (task 3.4). Through these stakeholder engagement processes, the moral-ethical drivers and societal expectations outlined in this white paper may form – together with the demonstration of technical-symbiotic systems – one of the key considerations for meaningful interaction around WSIS demonstration cases.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073107
oai:zenodo.org:8073107
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D4.1%20White%20paper%20Ultimate.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073106
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
WSIS
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Water Recycling
Water Reuse
Water Recovery
Wastewater
White Paper
Ethical Drivers
Societal Expectations
Corporate Social Responsibility
Responsible Research and Innovation
Ethical Drivers & Societal Expectations for the Circular Economy - A White Paper
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8073544
2023-06-25T14:26:59Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Kristine Jung
2020-08-04
<p>The target of ULTIMATE project is to act as a catalyst for “Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis” (WSIS) in which water/wastewater plays a key role both as a reusable resource and as a vector for energy and materials to be extracted, treated, stored and reused within a dynamic socio-economic and business oriented industrial ecosystem.</p>
<p>Effective communication and dissemination of the progress and results of ULTIMATE is of major importance to maximise the impact of the project and achieve long-lasting results.</p>
<p>D6.1 ‘Dissemination, Communication & Collaboration Master Plan’ is a framework for communication, dissemination and collaboration planned within ULTIMATE that empowers all partners to engage with multiple audiences during the lifecycle of the project. It describes the overall communication strategy of the consortium, and functions as a guide for project partners when publishing about or on behalf of the project.</p>
<p>This baseline document for communication and dissemination activities will be updated twice during the project lifetime – in M25 and M40, as the project partners get new insights about the major target groups and stakeholders, identify early adopters and further synergy partners.</p>
<p>Almost all project partners have been allocated resources in the WP6 to communicate, connect, create synergies, and support learning and policy making in order to maximise the visibility of the project. WP6 will be coordinated by the European Science Communication Institute (ESCI), with substantial strategic input from KWR and WE, plus support from all partners.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073544
oai:zenodo.org:8073544
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D6.1-Ultimate_DCC_Plan_version-1.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073543
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
WSIS
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Water Recycling
Water Reuse
Water Recovery
Communication
Dissemination
Collaboration
Outreach
Publications
Events
Visual Identity
Dissemination, Collaboration & Communication Master Plan
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:7656491
2023-02-20T14:26:32Z
openaire
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Kristine Jung
2020-09-01
<p>Project poster in A1 that was established to promote and disseminate the project website.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7656491
oai:zenodo.org:7656491
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Info%20Material/ULTIMATE_A1_poster.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7656490
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
H2020, WSIS, Wate rSmart Industrial Symbiosis, Circular Economy, Industrial Symbiosis, Water
ULTIMATE Poster
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:8363661
2023-09-20T14:27:02Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
AQUALIA
2022-03-22
<p>Durant els últims anys la depuradora de Lleida s’ha convertit en un exemple d’installació model en el camí cap a l’autosuficiència<br>
energètica. L’objectiu d’aquest any és superar el 50% a través de la generació d’energia solar i de biogàs, i al 2027 aconseguir la sobirania energètica, incorporant noves fonts de generació. Però, a més, seguint el compromís assumit per Aqualia per assolir els Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible (ODS), l’EDAR de Lleida estableix les seves metes i objectius per als anys vinents orientant el seu pla d’operació amb els ODS.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8363661
oai:zenodo.org:8363661
spa
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/News%20article/20220322E.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8363660
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
WSIS
Industrial Symbiosis
Circular Economy
Water recovery
Energy
La depuradora de Lleida, una de les més eficients del país, compromesa amb els Objectius de Desenvulupament Sosteible (ODS)
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
oai:zenodo.org:6984203
2023-02-20T13:19:17Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
A. Kleyböcker, C. Bruni, A. Naves Arnaldos, S. Casas Garriga; F. Fantone, J. van den Broeke, D. Iossifidis, A. Gimenez Lorang, I. Sabbah, K., M. Pidou, A. Reguer, L. Lundgaard, S. Bendix Larsen
2021-05-31
<p>This deliverable describes the symbiosis in detail and the situation in the case studies before the start of Ultimate. A special focus is put on the technological units which were already in place before Ultimate and the available flow streams as resources for the new Ultimate solutions.</p>
<p>Relevant data of those flow streams were collected in the frame of this deliverable to describe the baseline conditions that existed before the start of Ultimate. They will be used as a basis to quantify the improvements of the case study due to the implementation of the Ultimate circular economy solutions. The results will be presented in the deliverables D1.3 –D1.5 New approaches and best practices for closing the water, energy and material cycles within symbiosis cluster.</p>
<p>Furthermore, other work packages (WP), specifically WP2 and WP5, will need those data for their life cycle assessments in D2.2 LCA, cost and risk assessment for WSIS and their KPI tool in D2.5 A KPI Tool for WSIS Performance Assessment as well as for assessing starting conditions and requirements for other potential replication sites in D5.6 Three Ultimate WSIS Integrated Assessments, respectively.</p>
<p>The data were collected via excel templates from the case studies. The time period of the presented data comprises usually one full year of operation. The most important data are presented in the paragraphs Detailed description of the technological solution before Ultimate. In the subsequent paragraph Baseline Conditions, those and additional data are presented in more detail showing average, minimum and maximum values for each parameter as well as standard deviations. As an outlook for the expected results from Ultimate, the Ultimate solutions are briefly presented and the planned key performance indicators, which will be used in the upcoming technological deliverables (D1.3-D1.5) to evaluate the performance of the Ultimate solutions are displayed.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6984203
oai:zenodo.org:6984203
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D1.1-ULTIMATE_Baseline_Conditions_V1.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6984202
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy, Industrial Symbiosis, Water Recovery, Water Reuse, Water Recycling, Technologies
Assessment of baseline conditions for all case studies
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8060123
2023-06-20T14:26:49Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Wendy Ann Mansilla
Andrew Perkis
Sveinung Sægrov
Andrea Rubini
2020-11-24
<p>Deliverable 3.1 "Criteria for linking existing Living Labs to the Case Studies" was developed within Task 3.4 –“Living Lab engagement”, led by NTNU, from Work Package 3 (WP3) “Involve and engage stakeholders”.<br>
Purpose<br>
This deliverable defines the first criteria for linking existing Living Labs to the ULTIMATE case studies. The outcome will be used to provide recommendations for WP3 to form new Living Labs based on the case studies resulting in a new type of Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis Living Labs (WSIS-LL) including an open innovation environment best suited for symbiosis with industry.<br>
The outcome will be used to, to the extent possible, co-locate our engagement spaces in Task 3.3 with the WSIS-LLS to increase outreach and impact.<br>
The report provides a review of the characteristics of a generic Living Labs from the literature as well as Water Europe`s criteria for Water-oriented Living Labs from their Atlas and a discussion on Water-oriented Living Labs challenges.<br>
Method<br>
We will identify existing Living Labs (LL) in the regions of the ULTIMATE cases by using the existing Water Europe LL inventory and provide the criteria derived from our WSIS-LL typology to work with them towards upgrading their status to WSIS-LLS.<br>
Conclusion<br>
This report has developed a preliminary list of criteria for linking CSs to LLs to transition towards WSIS-LLs and proposes a tailored approach through continuous evaluation to integrate the user-centric process design of Living Labs towards a WSIS-LL. In the design of the criterion, we considered Living Lab`s learning and collaborative processes and their outcomes, which requires openness of the environment: real-life structure, ICT infrastructure, and willingness of the participating actors to experiment, try new forms of play, take risk, and allow openness in collaboration, co-creation and learning- along with exploitation of existing resources, skills and competences. We also considered the issues of scaling up of the Water-Oriented Living Lab’s, particularly through the need for an enabling structure and environment that motivates stakeholders from various sectors and industries to commit and engage in the Water-Oriented Living Labs. Finally, we defined the following set of linking criteria between the Living Labs and Case Studies:</p>
<ul>
<li>Community building and proper functioning</li>
<li>User driven, open innovation methodology implementation</li>
<li>Planning and collaboration outcomes</li>
<li>Capacity building and transferability potential</li>
<li>Iterative design of processes and organizational strategies</li>
<li>Sustainability and social impact</li>
</ul>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060123
oai:zenodo.org:8060123
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D3.1-ULTIMATE-Criteria%20Linking%20Existing%20Living%20Labs%20to%20the%20Case%20Studies.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060122
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
Water Smart
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Water Recovery
Water Reuse
Water Recycling
Stakeholder Engagement
Living Labs
Water Oriented Living Labs WoLL
Criteria for linking existing Living Labs to the Case Study
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8073340
2023-06-25T14:26:44Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Mayur Soni
Jean-Baptiste Quintana
Charles Xavier Sockeel
Laurence Rosichini
2022-02-14
<p>This deliverable 5.3 is about the exploitation strategy during the project lifetime of ULTIMATE (hence the suffix "(During)" to its title). It identifies the key exploitable results and the methodology that will be implemented in duration of the project to achieve the objectives. It defines the different types of exploitable entities (knowledge, methods, agreements, technologies, and networks) and their expected added value for key stakeholders. It provides assurance that the impact of the project is set out to have in between and once the end of the funding period is achieved. It discusses the project partners’ commitments and responsibilities in the exploitation activities to be carried out. It presents an overview of how the exploitable results will be utilised by key stakeholders.</p>
<p>The ULTIMATE plan for exploitation during the project lifetime is a public document and also dedicated to members of the ULTIMATE consortium. The content was built upon the insights and inputs provided by the whole consortium in order to gather and rationalise the dissemination activities and to identify a list of the first key exploitable results of the ongoing project.</p>
<p>The document first describes the project with its relevance to current water related problems and how ULTIMATE project can enable the different stakeholders to cope-up with water management challenges by implementing innovative WSIS solutions. This section also deals with the purpose of this document and detail all interactions with other work packages and deliverables.</p>
<p>The table of key exploitable results and technologies to be developed during the project is presented. This table gather key information on targeted markets, exploitation routes and IPR pathway. A second table describes TRL progression with demonstration level. Preliminary analysis of exploitable results and technologies has been carried out to provide some insights and highlight the key results of ULTIMATE.</p>
<p>The core content of the deliverable focuses on the methodology to be applied for exploitation activities during the project lifetime. It details the methodology that has been used to identify the key results that can be marketed and the next steps of the exploitation methodology (webinar, bilateral interviews, further upcoming investigations, etc.).. The main objective behind the process is to collect the data on key exploitable results with crucial parameters and characteristics to be tested during the market exploration (technical parameters, scope of application, potential diverted uses, economics, strategy, Strategy, Commercialisation, Willingness to exploit the results and create a startup).</p>
<p>The current identified results have been discussed together with the partners. The detailed strategy remains to be designed. The section four includes global individual strategies for each partner with their KER. The identified KER will be later assessed during dedicated interactive workshops and webinar held during the next GA consortium meetings. Additional interviews and assessments will be performed to apply characterisation and prioritisation techniques. These results will be disseminated with the dedicated communication strategy.<br>
A dedicated section focuses on a first couple of startup concepts: Seitiss, an industrial synergies builder and manager, and the solution developed by Greener than green by providing the startups background, concepts, technologies, maturity, differentiating aspects, initial possible business models and other relevant information related to the project result exploitation.</p>
<p>The first deliverable on exploitation sets up the basis in terms of potential exploitable results and strategy, and a second will be built upon detailed evaluation of each exploitable result, provide details, and fill the gaps step by step to improve the exploitation strategy and increase the granularity level of the information provided (IPR management, exploitation format, pricing strategy, etc).</p>
<p>The deliverable pointed out that the partners have not developed a clear view of the exploitation landscape surrounding the project yet. Most partners feel that they will be more prepared to contribute to developing the exploitation strategy and plan towards the end of the project, when the concepts and technology will be more mature. One of the lessons learned is that it is crucial to open up the discussion on exploitation with partners early in the project. It takes time to develop a profound understanding of the full spectrum of exploitation and to formulate a take on it. It is, therefore, important to encourage partners to start thinking about their stance as early as possible. ULTIMATE, and WP5 in particular, provides the consortium partners with the methods and the means to perform this in a EU wide context.</p>
<p>The next steps start with involving all partners in the joint effort of developing the final exploitation strategy to ensure successful exploitation of the results of the project. All partners have committed to contributing to and engaging in exploitation activities to achieve this objective. A major phase of market exploration will be launched in the upcoming period for the first startup concepts. The deliverable details upcoming action to be done to reach a maximum impact for WSIS solutions.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073340
oai:zenodo.org:8073340
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D5.3%20ULTIMATE_Plan%20for%20exploitation%20during%20project%20lifetime.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8073339
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
WSIS
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Water Reuse
Water Recycling
Water Recovery
Exploitation Strategy
Key Exploitable Results
KER
TRL
Commercialisation
Business Models
ULTIMATE Plan for Exploitation during Projet Lifetime
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:7614940
2023-02-20T13:15:33Z
openaire
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Kristine Jung
2020-09-01
<p>A call to action postcard to accompany the website launch and to promote the project at external events.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7614940
oai:zenodo.org:7614940
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Info%20Material/ULTIMATE_Flyer%20postcard.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7614939
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
WSIS, Water-Smart Industrial Symbiosis, Circular Economy, Industrial Symbiosis, Water
ULTIMATE Flyer Postcard
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:8362669
2023-09-20T14:26:59Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
Aitor Corchero
2022-05-30
<p>is mainly focused on the elaboration of the water smart industrial symbiosis ontology that will permit to establish informational links between industries and processes that permit to understand the possibilities and the impacts to share resources between industries. The work performed has derived on the publication of the WSIS Ontology as the initial asset to establish a common vocabulary to understand the information and share information across industries about this potential reusability of resources (water, material, etc). The main novelty of this ontology relies on the representation of process interlink in terms of different resources. Also, it is important to highlight the interlink on the potential benefits aligned with key performance indicators (KPIS) of the nexus (related to Task 2.4) to facilitate data understanding at different levels (from micro levels to meso levels). Considering these aspects, this ontology has been constructed following an agile semantic developing methodology called SAMOD to facilitate ontology construction, documentation, and publication. Based on this methodology, the ontology has been published under the following link for their reuse and extension:<br>
<a href="https://w3id.org/def/wsis">https://w3id.org/def/wsis</a><br>
For the construction of the ontology, we used process information about the “CS#2- Nieuw Prinsenland”. Complementary to the ontology design, this information have served to the elaboration of the initial version of an online tool called “RIOTER” (Reactive Internet of Thinks). This online tool permit to explore semantic enriched datasets in regard to industrial symbiosis and help to establish strategies to determine industrial symbiosis in companies. All of these assets finally contribute to the main objective of the task in relation to link cross-domain information (water, energy, food, climate and environment) with socio-economic parameters and technology options to generate and assess the medium- and long-term performance of alternative symbiotic strategies and increase eco-efficiency and reliability.<br>
Definitely, the design and implementation of the ontology and the semantic repository contributed to the following aspects:<br>
• Support the data representation to enable circular economy and process symbiosis strategies.<br>
• Provide metadata and context-based information to interlink water management information with industrial process, material and energy industrial fluxes.<br>
• Generating open linked data related to industrial process and the process symbiosis information.<br>
• Support the construction of data models that permit to harmonize the information exchange and the production of Open APIs to explore such information.<br>
• Provide online tool to navigate and explore the information for their understanding and support to elaborate WISIS strategies.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8362669
oai:zenodo.org:8362669
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Reports/D2.1_ULTIMATE_Online%20Tool%20for%20WSIS.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8362668
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Online Tool
WSIS
semantic-driven
An online tool for semantic-driven WSIS
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8060017
2023-06-20T14:26:49Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
A. Kleyböcker, A. Arnaldos, C. Bruni, F. Fatone
2021-11-18
<p>Background and objective of the TEB<br>
In the frame of the H2020 project NextGen (Grant Agreement No. 776541), a technology evidence base (TEB) has been set up. It is a database that will contain the results of the NextGen demo cases and generic information on the demonstrated circular economy technologies in NextGen. The aim of the TEB is to unify the results and to allow for an easy access to relevant information needed for setting up new circular economy schemes in the water sector. The TEB will be accessible via the NextGen Marketplace. In the long term, Water Europe will host the TEB along with the Marketplace. Up to now, the TEB contains 26 factsheets prepared by the NextGen consortium. In NextGen, the technologies are applied mainly for water, material and energy recovery from municipal wastewater.<br>
Ultimate focuses on water smart industrial symbioses and demonstrates circular economy based technologies applied in the industrial, water and energy sectors. Ultimate supplements very well the industrial aspect in the TEB and provides new information on symbiotic cooperation opportunities between the industry and the water sector. Hence, the Ultimate technologies are very suitable to extend the TEB.</p>
<p><br>
TEB concept and integration of the Ultimate technologies<br>
The TEB is structured in three domains focusing on technologies to recover and reuse (1) water, (2) material and (3) energy. Each domain consists of different subdomains for example wastewater treatment for water reuse, nutrient recovery technologies or biomass production technologies. Each subdomain provides a collection of technology factsheets. The concept explains the taxonomy of the NextGen technologies and the integration of the Ultimate technologies in this taxonomy. The technology factsheets contain mainly generic information, while the case study factsheets will contain case study specific information and will be accessible via the technology factsheets, but also directly through the knowledge portal. Finally, the TEB concept considers aspects regarding the assurance of a good data quality and provides an outlook for its future maintenance.</p>
<p><br>
Exploitation and EU-added value of the TEB<br>
The EU-added value of the TEB (D1.6 and D1.7) will be a very broad collection of evidence-based data from circular economy related technologies. Besides NextGen and Ultimate, also B-WaterSmart (Grant Agreement No. 869171) will deliver factsheets for the TEB. The sister project Water-Mining (Grant Agreement No. 869474) already indicated its interest to contribute to the TEB. Ultimate will promote further the TEB in order to gain more projects to present their results in the TEB. The collection and open access presentation of the technologies will support decision makers and investors to gain a fast overview of the opportunities and proven concepts of circular economy. Together with the Marketplace (D5.5), the TEB will severely contribute to the transition from a linear to a circular economy in Europe.</p>
<p><br>
The TEB promotes technologies that are in line with the ambitions of the European Green Deal (European Commission 2019) to reduce strongly our greenhouse gas emissions, to provide clean water, to maintain healthy soil, make industry resilient and produce cleaner energy. The TEB presents technologies that can be applied in the frame of the Regulation (EU) 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse, the Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and the Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.</p>
<p> </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060017
oai:zenodo.org:8060017
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D1.6_ULTIMATE_TEB%20concept%20and%20integration.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8060015
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy
Industrial Symbiosis
Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis
Water Recovery
Water Reuse
Water Recycling
Technologies
Case Studies
Technologies Evidence Base
Marketplace
Technology Evidence Base concept and integration
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:7588552
2023-02-20T13:17:18Z
user-ultimate_water
user-eu
A. Kleyböcker, C. Bruni, F. Fantone, A. Naves Arnaldos, J. van den Broeke, T. Guleria, M. Touloupi, D. Iossifidis, A. Gimenez Lorang, I. Sabbah, K. Farah, M. Pidou, A. Reguer, L. Vredenbregt, P. Thisgaard, U. Miehe
2022-05-27
<p>The European industry is the largest water consuming sector after agriculture, with a significantly larger water footprint than residential/urban areas. They also face a fierce competition worldwide, with limited domestic resources. Moving to a circular economy (CE) paradigm that valorises a wide range of water-embedded resources: water, energy, nutrients and high added-value compounds, will future-proof European industries, climate-proof European society and safeguard the environment. Water Smart Industrial Symbiosis (WSIS) as a particular form of CE applicable to industrial contexts promises a new potential by systematically looking to reuse wastes between industries as raw materials. WSIS promises benefits from lower costs as well as new types of revenues, exploiting ‘waste’ management not only as a legal obligation but as a new business opportunity.</p>
<p>WSIS is a novel approach with as of yet limited applications. In ULTIMATE, WSIS between the industrial sector and service providers of the water sector are demonstrated at significant scales thus creating an evidence-based approach for successful WSIS implementation anchored on real-world cases.</p>
<p>Therefore, at nine case studies distributed across Europe and Israel, the ULTIMATE consortium has established so called WSISs. They develop and demonstrate 21 pilot plants, which recover water, materials and/or energy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Deliverable D1.2 is a demonstrator type deliverable and shall show, that the ULTIMATE pilot plants are operational. Therefore, presentations showing the operational pilot plants will be accessible on the ULTIMATE webpage at the case study section (https://ultimatewater.eu/demonstration-cases/). This document accompanies the presentations which are meant to be the main evidence for D1.2 and shows the progress until M24.</p>
<p>Prior to the pilot plant implementation, eight WSISs conduct laboratory experiments. In total, 15 different laboratory experiments and/or investigations of already existing facilities are accomplished to better understand the circumstances of the real environment and to learn more about the type of technology before it is up-scaled from laboratory to pilot scale. Seven of the 15 investigations are already completed and seven are close to be completed (75-90%).</p>
<p>Until M24, five pilot plants or (parts of) treatment trains were operational. Three of them are related to water recovery at the case studies in Nafplio (CS4), Lleida (CS5) and Kalundborg (CS9). One of them is related to material recovery in Lleida (CS5) and the last one is related to energy recovery in Karmiel (CS6).</p>
<p>Until M27, ten additional plants are expected to be operational. Most of them are quite close to be constructed with a progress between 70% and 100% such as the material recovery unit in Rosignano (CS3), final parts of the water recovery treatment train in Lleida (CS5), two energy recovery units in Lleida (CS5) and one energy recovery unit in Shafdan (CS6). Even though the progress is only at 25% in Tarragona (CS1), the case study leader expects the two pilot plants for water recovery to be operational until M27 as for the pilot plants in Tain (CS7) dealing with water, nutrient and energy recovery and reuse.</p>
<p>Until M30, the last six pilot plants shall be operational according to the case study leaders. One of the six pilot plants recovers water, one recovers energy and the other four recovery different materials. Especially for those six pilot plants, the contingency plan is to extend and intensify the laboratory and preparatory experiments to gain more important data and experience in depth that suggest to accelerate and to shorten the start-up and optimisation phase of the pilot plants. Even though all case study leaders still expect to complete their pilot test within the project life time of 48 months, time is becoming a critical factor as sufficient time is required to gain experience from the pilots and translate this into best practices for WSIS implementation.</p>
<p>Until all pilot plants will be operational, a very close monitoring of the case studies will be done by the WP1 management team with the case study leaders and the risk officer via regularly meetings. In addition, the presentations referring to D1.2 will be updated every three months until every pilot plant will be operational.</p>
<p>D1.2 is the basis for the demonstration of the ULTIMATE solutions and for the generation of valuable data. Those data will be needed for the technology evidence base (D1.7), for the best practice guidelines (D1.3, D1.4, and D1.5) and also for the assessments of our circular economy solutions (D2.3 and D2.5). Those results will contribute to find suitable strategies for the replication of our concepts and thus, be the basis for the overall exploitation strategy (D5.9).</p>
<p>Hence, the EU-added value of this deliverable is its contribution to crucial deliverables that will foster and boost circular economy solutions in the European industry and the water sector. The collection and open access presentation of the technologies in the technology evidence base (D1.7) will support decision makers and investors to gain a fast overview of the opportunities and proven concepts of circular economy. Together with the Marketplace (D5.5), the technology evidence base can significantly contribute to the transition from a linear to a circular economy in Europe.</p>
<p>ULTIMATE promotes circular economy solutions that are in line with the ambitions of the European Green Deal (European Commission 2019) its Action Plan for Circular Economy (European Commission 2020) to reduce strongly our greenhouse gas emissions, to provide clean water, to maintain healthy soil, make industry resilient and produce cleaner energy. This deliverable (D1.2) presents technologies that can be applied in the frame of the Regulation (EU) 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse, the Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and the Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7588552
oai:zenodo.org:7588552
eng
Zenodo
https://ultimatewater.eu/wp-content/uploads/file-manager/public-folder/Public%20Deliverables/D1.2_ULTIMATE_demonstrator_V1.pdf
https://zenodo.org/communities/ultimate_water
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7588551
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Circular Economy, Industrial Symbiosis, Water Recovery, Water Reuse, Water Recycling, Technologies, Demonstrator, Demo Cases
Accompanying document to Deliverable 1.2 - Operational demo cases
info:eu-repo/semantics/report