2024-03-29T10:59:23Z
https://zenodo.org/oai2d
oai:zenodo.org:4289243
2022-08-19T17:36:54Z
user-ocsdnet
openaire
user-kel
Chan, Leslie
2020-11-24
<p>This talk highlights some key concerns with the growing "platformitization" of academic knowledge infrastructures that are controlled by a small number of multinational publishers. These oligarch publishers hold enormous power not only over how and where researchers publish, but also over the governance of universities as public institutions. Recent debates on open access have tended to focus on the visible problems with access (namely paywalls and licensing barriers), but insufficient attention has been given to the hidden and invisible power imbalance and asymmetry between the infrastructure providers and the users. I argue that much of these invisible and hidden elements that govern the current knowledge production system are deeply rooted in colonial practices and on Whiteness. This is why, despite the growing acceptance of open access, racial and other forms of inequities in scholarly production continues to widen. I will provide support to my arguments with case studies, and point to means for collective action for decentering Whiteness in knowledge production. </p>
<p> </p>
Presentation at the Critical Knowledge Forum Adelphi University Nov. 9, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4289243
oai:zenodo.org:4289243
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4289242
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
platformitization
Knowledge Infrastructure
Open Science
Whiteness
Academic Capitalism
University Rankings
Decentering the White Gaze of Academic Knowledge Production
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:4320071
2020-12-14T00:27:10Z
user-ocsdnet
Chan, Leslie
Okune, Angela
Hillyer, Rebecca
Albornoz, Dennise
Posada, Alejandro
2019-10-01
<p>Contextualizing Openness offers a fascinating look at Open Science and the democratization of knowledge in international development and social transformation with a focus on the Global South. This volume presents contri­butions from the 12 projects that form the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet) organized around four central themes: Defining Open Sci­ence in Development, Governing Open Science, Negotiat­ing Open Science, and Expanding Open Science for Social Transformation.</p>
<p>Chan, L., Okune, A., Hillyer, R., Albornoz, D., & Posada, A. (Eds.). (2019). <em>Contextualizing Openness: Situating Open Science</em>. University of Ottawa Press. <a href="https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/contextualizing-openness-situating-open-science">https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/contextualizing-openness-situating-open-science</a></p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320071
oai:zenodo.org:4320071
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320070
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open Science, Open Access, Global South, Situated Openness, Knowledge Demography, Knowledge Equity, Inclusive Infrastructure
Contextualizing Openness: Situating Open Science.
info:eu-repo/semantics/book
oai:zenodo.org:6377048
2022-08-19T17:27:12Z
user-ocsdnet
openaire
user-decolonizingscience
user-kel
Chan, Leslie
2022-03-22
<p>Multiple forms of inequities exist in higher education and research institutions, traditionally regarded as the centers of knowledge production. Despite various reform efforts, generally under the guise of equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives, stark inequities in knowledge production systems persist, both within and across institutions. The intersecting racial, epistemic, gender, class, and many other institutional biases are encoded into daily practices and in critical knowledge infrastructure and remain largely invisible. These norms and standards are seldom questioned and are often presented as neutral and universal. Open science or open scholarship practices, far from reducing the inequities in the participation and in the benefits of research, may run the risk of amplifying and consolidating the existing power hierarchy and dominance of the already powerful institutions and actors. This talk calls for inward reflection of how institutional racism and colonial legacy continue to structure and govern knowledge practices and ways of knowing and argue for justice-centered redesign of knowledge infrastructures that center historically marginalized communities and systems of knowledge.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6377048
oai:zenodo.org:6377048
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/decolonizingscience
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6377047
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
ON-MERRIT final event: Ensuring Equity in Open Science, Online, March 22, 2022
Geopolitics of Knowledge, Equity in Open Science, Labour Governance,
Why are the "rich" in open science getting richer? Reflections on structural inequities and knowledge production
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:4319211
2020-12-13T00:27:09Z
user-ocsdnet
openaire
Albornoz, Dennise
Okune, Angela
Hillyer, Rebecca
Posada, Alejandro
Chan, Leslie
2017-06-12
<p>The poster, presented at the ELPUB2017 Conference in Cyprus, depicts the process through which the OCSDNet Manifesto was constructed, and the rationale behind the process.</p>
<p>Graphics by Giulia Forsythe</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4319211
oai:zenodo.org:4319211
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4319210
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Limassol, Cyprus, June 6-8, 2017
Co-Creating A Manifesto to Reclaim the Open Science Narrative
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:4573782
2022-08-19T17:30:19Z
user-ocsdnet
openaire
user-kel
Chan, Leslie
2021-03-02
<p>This is a presentation at the online conference Open Research: A Vision for the Future, hosted by the RIOT Science Club, King's College London.</p>
<p>http://riotscience.co.uk/open-research-a-vision-for-the-future/</p>
<p>Debates about the how and why of Open Science have tended to focus on the technicality, standards, and conditions about what is and what isn’t “open”. More importantly, the guidelines and principles on open science that have been proliferating are centered on largely Western and Global North perspectives. The more crucial questions of by whom and for whom should science be open, and who has the power to set the agenda of open science are often not addressed. In this talk, I like to highlight some of the values and benefits of openness to knowledges and ways of knowing from communities and knowledge makers who have been historically excluded from “main-stream science.” I like to share ideas on how a pluriversal open science commons based on epistemic justice principles and solidarity, drawn from Indigenous and other knowledge traditions, can be sustained and governed by communities and for communities in various contexts.</p>
This is a presentation at the online conference Open Research: A Vision for the Future, hosted by the RIOT Science Club, King's College London.
http://riotscience.co.uk/open-research-a-vision-for-the-future/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4573782
oai:zenodo.org:4573782
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4573781
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open Research: A Vision for the Future, hosted by the RIOT Science Club, King's College London., Online, March 2, 2021
open research, open science, community-based research, situated openness, knowledge equity
Open Science: For and With Communities
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:6620985
2022-06-08T01:50:37Z
user-ocsdnet
openaire
user-kel
Chan, Leslie
2022-06-07
<p>Recently, several collaborators and I submitted a chapter proposal in response to a call for submission to a volume on critical infrastructure studies and digital humanities. The editors did not accept our proposal. They cited the high number of submissions and the “word limit” specified by the university press contracted for the volume as the reason. In this talk, I like to reflect on how networked possibilities (the multimodal forms of scholarly artifacts and modes of engagements) are still being dictated by the properties of print and its associated academic capital. In the meantime, much of the critical infrastructures necessary for the networked open scholarship are increasingly being designed and controlled by a small handful of multinational corporate publishers turned data analytics cartels. The creation of end-to-end knowledge production and evaluation platform and its inscribed logic of data extraction has enormous implications for our aspirations for open scholarship. We may still be focused on infrastructures as the object of study, but we should be more concerned with how infrastructures govern our labour and scholarly practices and, above all, our autonomy. The talk ends with suggestions on how best to design community governance over infrastructure, instead of being governed by infrastructures, not by our design. </p>
Digital Humanities Summer Institute 2022 Keynote
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6620985
oai:zenodo.org:6620985
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6620984
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
DHSI22, Digital Humanities Summer Institute 2022, Online, June 7, 2022
Open Infrastructure, Sustainability, Exclusion by Design, Standards, Inclusive Infrastructure
Is Open Scholarship Possible without Open Infrastructure?
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:2596865
2020-12-12T21:55:20Z
user-ocsdnet
openaire
Leslie Chan
2019-03-17
<p>This is the presentation slide deck for the keynote at <a href="https://opencon-cascadia.github.io/">OpenCon Cascadia, Feb. 1-2 2019 </a></p>
<p>In this talk, I argue that scholarly communication and scientific knowledge production should be seen as a complex system of power that favours privileged institutions and individuals, and marginalize and even oppress those who do not conform to the norms and “standards” established by the powerful. The result is a deeply entrenched epistemological hierarchy. Openness alone cannot “transform” this complex as this interlocking system of institutions and technology are deeply rooted in past political and ideological structures. They have become invisible infrastructure and seldom questioned. To begin to disrupt this system, we need to go beyond challenging the visible barriers of the system, notably paywall and licensing issues, to question the hidden and invisible power that sustains and replicate power and privilege. To this end, we need to rethink what constitutes infrastructure, who has the power to build and govern them, what informs its design, who are subjected to its “governance”, and the consequences for the powerless. In particular, I wish to focus on infrastructure as forms of invisible power. I will provide examples to demonstrate that simply imposing “open” on closed infrastructures serve to replicate existing power inequality and epistemic injustice. Openness, when decontextualized from its historical and political roots, could become as exploitative and oppressive as the legacy system it seeks to displace.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2596865
oai:zenodo.org:2596865
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2596864
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
OpenCon Cascadia, Portland, USA, Feb. 1-2 2019
inclusive infrastructure, power analysis, open science, open access, governance, epistemic justice
Whose Open Science? And Why Infrastructure Matters
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:4320060
2022-08-19T17:40:51Z
user-ocsdnet
user-kel
Albornoz, Denisse
Okune, Angela
Chan, Leslie
2020-10-01
<p>Albornoz, D., Okune, A., & Chan, L. (2020). Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice? In <em>Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. Martin Paul Eve & Jonathan Gray (eds)</em> (pp. 65–79). MIT Press. <a href="https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4933/chapter/625156/Can-Open-Scholarly-Practices-Redress-Epistemic">https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4933/chapter/625156/Can-Open-Scholarly-Practices-Redress-Epistemic</a></p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320060
oai:zenodo.org:4320060
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320059
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open Science, Open Access, Epistemic Injustice; OCSDNet, Global South
Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice?
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
oai:zenodo.org:4320092
2022-08-19T17:38:55Z
user-ocsdnet
user-kel
Okune, Angela
Hillyer, Rebecca
Albornoz, Denisse
Posada, Alejandro
Chan, Leslie
2019-06-08
<p>The current discourse around Open Science has tended to focus on the creation of new technological platforms and tools to facilitate sharing and reuse of a wide range of research outputs. There is an assumption that once these new tools are in place, researchers—and at times, members of the general public—will be able to participate in the creation of scientific knowledge in more accessible and efficient ways. While many of these new tools have indeed assisted in the ease of collaboration through online spaces and mechanisms, the narrowness of how infrastructure is imagined by open science practitioners tends to put the use of technology ahead of the issues that people are actually trying to solve, while failing to acknowledge the systemic constraints that exist within and between some communities. Drawing on an analytical framework grounded in Black feminist intersectionality (Noble, “A Future”), this paper highlights the need for more inclusive knowledge infrastructures, particularly in the context of fair and sustainable development. Three case studies from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet), are outlined in order to illustrate the importance of moving beyond a definition of infrastructure as merely a technical or physical entity. These cases, arising from research conducted in South Africa, Brazil and the Caribbean, demonstrate how more sustainable and nuanced forms of collaboration and participation may be enabled through broader understandings of knowledge infrastructures. This paper further argues that leveraging the feminist concept of intersectionality when conceptualizing the development of knowledge infrastructures could be one way to move from narrow assumptions about standardized knowledge “users” towards more inclusive reimaginings of how a plurality of knowledge can be produced and shared via networked technologies.</p>
Angela Okune, Rebecca Hillyer, Denisse Albornoz, Alejandro Posada, Leslie Chan. Whose Infrastructure?
Towards Inclusive and Collaborative Knowledge Infrastructures in Open Science. ELPUB 2018,
Jun 2018, Toronto, Canada.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320092
oai:zenodo.org:4320092
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320091
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Whose Infrastructure? Towards Inclusive and Collaborative Knowledge Infrastructures in Open Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePaper
oai:zenodo.org:4320065
2020-12-14T00:27:10Z
user-ocsdnet
Hillyer, Rebecca
Albornoz, Denisse
Posada, Alejandro
Okune, Angela
Chan, Leslie
2020-11-05
<p>Hillyer, R., Albornoz, D., Posada, A., Okune, A., & Chan, L. (2020). Toward an Inclusive, Open, and Collaborative Science: Lessons from OCSDNet. In <em>Making Open Development Inclusive: Lessons from IDRC Research. Matthew L Smith & Ruhiya Seward (eds)</em>. MIT Press. <a href="https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4873/chapter/618144/Toward-an-Inclusive-Open-and-Collaborative-Science">https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4873/chapter/618144/Toward-an-Inclusive-Open-and-Collaborative-Science</a></p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320065
oai:zenodo.org:4320065
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320064
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Inclusive Open Science, Open Science, Open Access, Epistemic Justice, Situated Openness
Toward an Inclusive, Open, and Collaborative Science: Lessons from OCSDNet
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
oai:zenodo.org:4320080
2020-12-14T00:27:10Z
user-ocsdnet
Chan, Leslie
Okune, Angela
Hillyer, Rebecca
Albornoz, Dennise
2016-06-15
<p>This report highlights the main objectives and key outcomes of the Open and Collaborative<br>
Science in Development Network first network-wide meeting, held in Bangkok February<br>
17-20, 2016. Workshop participants included project representatives from all twelve of the<br>
network’s projects, external advisors and the network-coordination team.<br>
Key workshop activities included the drafting of an Open Science Manifesto, the<br>
presentation and discussion of twelve concept papers around ‘contextual understandings of<br>
openness’, and a public event to showcase the network and catalyse partnership<br>
opportunities in the South East Asia region. Key outcomes included the formation of two<br>
strategic working groups that will focus respectively on short and long-term network<br>
activities to ensure continued network impact, field building and sustainability.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320080
oai:zenodo.org:4320080
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320079
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
WORKSHOP REPORT: Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network Meeting, Bangkok, Thailand, Feb. 2016
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4320096
2020-12-14T14:02:03Z
user-ocsdnet
Okune, Angela
Chan, Leslie
Hillyer, Rebecca
Albornoz, Denisse
Posada, Alejandro
2018-09-01
<p>The Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet), funded by IDRC and DFID from 2014-2017, had the key objective of gathering evidence to better understand how and whether an open and collaborative approach to scientific knowledge production could contribute to development outcomes across a variety of social, economic and political contexts. As OCSDNet began to develop a more comprehensive framework of OCS, we came to realize that much of the groundwork looking at inclusive science practices and theory has been laid by other scholars in a variety of fields, especially feminist postcolonial technoscience scholars. With OCSDNet coming to a close in its current configuration, it was timely to bring a small subset of scholars and practitioners together to discuss what can be set in motion through situated feminist open science projects in diverse global contexts. The following report highlights the proceedings of the two-day workshop which took place from June 20-21 immediately preceding the <a href="http://epress.utsc.utoronto.ca/elpub2018/">Electronic Publishing (ELPub) conference held in Toronto, Canada.</a></p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320096
oai:zenodo.org:4320096
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320095
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Feminist Open Science, Inclusive Knowledge Infrastructure, Intersectionality, Consent, Non-Innonence, Data Justice
Workshop Report: OCSDNet Imagining a Feminist Open Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4320089
2020-12-14T00:27:10Z
user-ocsdnet
Chan, Leslie
Okune, Angela
Amwayi, Jacob
Hillyer, Rebecca
Albornoz, Denisse
Posada, Alejandro
2018-08-15
<p>The Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet) is an international<br>
research network, launched in 2014, to address the fundamental question of whether and how<br>
open science has the potential to contribute to the achievement of development goals and<br>
opportunities. Facilitated by a coordination team from the University of Toronto and iHub Kenya,<br>
the network has been composed of twelve international research teams located throughout<br>
Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia from highly diverse disciplinary backgrounds.<br>
Over the course of two years, each team explored the challenges and opportunities for an open<br>
and collaborative science, and the potential of open science to facilitate fair and sustainable<br>
development.<br>
In this final progress report, the coordination team synthesizes insights and lessons learned<br>
following an analysis of the 12 sub-projects. Over the course of two years, network members<br>
have recognised that an inclusive open science involves a highly dynamic process of<br>
negotiating and challenging power relations within highly situated social contexts, and amongst<br>
actors and institutions with varying claims for knowledge legitimacy. This questioning of power<br>
within OCSDNet’s practice and conceptualization of open science has been in contrast to more<br>
mainstream discourses, which tend to present Open Science as a neutral set of standards,<br>
tools, and workflows to be followed, often with the objective of pursuing utilitarian or<br>
market-driven outcomes. In this report, we reflect briefly on some of these insights and shifting<br>
discourses and practices of Open Science. The report also includes the more tangible outcomes<br>
and outputs of the network. We conclude with key recommendations for those who are<br>
interested in working on topics related to Open Science and development as well as<br>
suggestions for those facilitating global, heterogeneous research groups in a network structure<br>
similar to that employed by OCSDNet.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320089
oai:zenodo.org:4320089
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4320088
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open Science, development, inclusive approaches to knowledge production, inclusive infrastructures, collaboration, co-production, research tools, citizen science
Final Technical Report (Feb. 2018) - OCSDNet Catalyzing Open and Collaborative Science to Address Development Challenges
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:8339087
2024-03-18T14:48:45Z
user-ocsdnet
user-kel
Keim, Wiebke
Rodriguez Medina, Leandro
Okune, Angela
Chan, Leslie
2023-06-30
<p>This chapter uses what has become arguably the most ubiquitous piece of thinking infrastructure, the Digital Object Identifier (DOI), as a point of entry to explore the infrastructuring of hegemonic power in knowledge circulation. The chapter opens with a technical explanation of the DOI, followed by a brief history of the formation of the organizations that undergird the DOI. Along with the other metric devices, emerging “norms'' and narratives about the DOI further reinforce its centrality and we spend time debunking these myths. We close by exploring and making visible the relational work that the DOI performs to enable and shape the development of surveillance publishing, a dominant mode of profit and cognitive extraction in the higher education and research market.</p>
<p>Bibliographic information:</p>
<p>Okune A, Chan L. 2023 Digital object identifier: privatising knowledge circulation through infrastructuring. In <strong>Routledge handbook of academic knowledge circulation</strong> (eds Keim W et al.), pp. 278-287. London, UK: Routledge.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8339087
oai:zenodo.org:8339087
eng
Routledge
https://zenodo.org/communities/kel
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8339086
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
scholarly infrastructure
DOI
Digital Object Identifier: Privatising Knowledge Governance through Infrastructuring
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
oai:zenodo.org:3946773
2021-03-07T00:13:16Z
user-ocsdnet
user-decolonizingscience
Chan, Leslie
Hall, Budd
Piron, Florence
Tandon, Rajesh
Williams, Wanósts'a7 Lorna
2020-07-15
<p>UNESCO is launching international consultations aimed at developing a Recommendation on Open Science for adoption by member states in 2021. Its Recommendation will include a common definition, a shared set of values, and proposals for action.<br>
At the invitation of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO, this paper aims to contribute to the consultation process by answering questions such as:<br>
<br>
• Why and how should science be “open”? For and with whom?<br>
• Is it simply a matter of making scientific articles and data fully available to researchers around the world at the time of publication, so they do not miss important results that could contribute to or accelerate their work?<br>
• Could this openness also enable citizens around the world to contribute to science with their capacities and expertise, such as through citizen science or participatory action research projects?<br>
• Does science that is truly open include a plurality of ways of knowing, including those of Indigenous cultures, Global South cultures, and other excluded, marginalized groups in the Global North?<br>
<br>
The paper has four sections: “Open Science and the pandemic” introduces and explores different forms of openness during a crisis where science suddenly seems essential to the well-being of all. The next three sections explain the main dimensions of three forms of scientific openness: openness to publications and data, openness to society, and openness to excluded knowledges2 and epistemologies3. We conclude with policy considerations.</p>
<p>A French version of this paper is available here: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3947013#.Xw-Ksx17nOQ">https://zenodo.org/record/3947013#.Xw-Ksx17nOQ</a></p>
We would like to thank the Canadian Commission for UNESCO for supporting our approach to Open Science and the decolonization of knowledge. In particular we would like to thank Eleanor Haine-Bennett who has contributed both to the process and the content of this brief and to Sebastien Goupil, Secretary-General of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO, for his support and contributions. Special thanks go to Baptiste Godrie for his review of our final drafts. Importantly each of us owes a deep debt of gratitude to the communities within which we have been born, lived and worked. We are grateful to the Indigenous and non-Indigenous women, men and young people of communities in British Columbia and Québec in Canada, Haiti, West Africa, Brazil and other countries in Latin America, and many parts of urban and rural India. Knowledge is everywhere.
A French version of this paper is available here: https://zenodo.org/record/3947013#.Xw-Ksx17nOQ
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3946773
oai:zenodo.org:3946773
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/decolonizingscience
https://zenodo.org/communities/ocsdnet
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3946772
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open Access
Open Science
Community Based Research
Epistemic Justice
Bibliodiversity
Pluriversal knowledge
Open Science Beyond Open Access: For and with communities, A step towards the decolonization of knowledge
info:eu-repo/semantics/other