2024-03-29T07:32:42Z
https://zenodo.org/oai2d
oai:zenodo.org:4303980
2020-12-04T00:27:08Z
user-inclusive-conservation
ENVISION
2019-11-21
<p>This paper provides an overview on the current status and concepts of biodiversity conservation both within the European Union and the United States of America. It further elaborates on the challenges biodiversity conservation faces in both regions and exemplifies how ENVISION’s inclusive-conservation approach can contribute with novel tools to successfully secure species diversity and human well-being in protected areas for future generations.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4303980
oai:zenodo.org:4303980
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4303979
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
biodiversity conservation, European Unio, United States, inclusive-conservation, protected areas
Fact Sheet - What is inclusive conservation and why is it important to biodiversity conservation and protected area management?
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4304030
2020-12-04T00:27:08Z
user-inclusive-conservation
ENVISION
Filyushkina, Anna
2020-05-22
<p>To illustrate two steps of the inclusive conservation approach we present the case study of the Utrechtse Heuvelrug National Park and Kromme Rijn region, which is a multifunctional landscape centrally located in the Netherlands. This case study presents how, inclusive conservation becomes a part of the long-term strategy for a more harmonious alignment of different use interests and for the development of shared visions for the Utrechtse Heuvelrug and Kromme Rijn region.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304030
oai:zenodo.org:4304030
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304029
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
inclusive conservation, Utrechtse Heuvelrug National Park, Kromme Rijn region, multifunctional landscape, shared visions
Fact Sheet - ENVISION: promoting inclusive conservation in protected areas. Case A: Identification of visions for protected area management and quantification of their consequences in the Utrechtse Heuvelrug and Kromme Rijn (Netherlands)
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4304086
2020-12-04T00:27:08Z
user-inclusive-conservation
ENVISION
2020-10-28
<p>ENVISION’s contribution towards an inclusive Global Biodiversity Framework.</p>
<p>In this brief, we present how the inclusive conservation approach can be helpful in the implementation of both the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. A unifying challenge for protected area (PA) management is the need to extend and broaden the stewardship of PAs, by including the diverse visions of stakeholders and engaging nearby communities. Using first results emerging from the ENVISION case studies we explore to what extent balancing diverse stakeholder visions is possible, and how strategies based on collectively defined visions can be translated into sustainable protected area management at multiple scales. Different inclusive approaches include assessing multiple visions for protected area management, considering their consequences collectively, defining new visions, and exploring power relations and different governance models. The policy brief aims to demonstrate how the inclusive conservation approach can accommodate and balance different visions for PA management, which is a crucial step towards achieving socially relevant and environmentally sustainable outcomes in PA management.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304086
oai:zenodo.org:4304086
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304085
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
biodiversity conservation, inclusive-conservation, protected areas
Policy Brief: Towards an Inclusive Global Biodiversity Framework
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4352166
2022-01-10T18:29:19Z
user-inclusive-conservation
user-eu
Andrade, R.
Johnson, E.
Salcido, E.
Goodson, D.
Rowe, G.
Colianni, R.
Johnson, E.
Craver, A.
Keller, R.
Stewart, W.
van Riper, C.J.
2020-12-18
<p>The goal of the ENVISION project in Denali is to establish a process for advancing “inclusive conservation” that reflects multiple viewpoints on the future of protected area management in Interior Alaska, particularly through the use of social learning as a tool to connect decision-makers and local communities in discussions about landscape change.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4352166
oai:zenodo.org:4352166
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4352165
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
inclusive conservation, social learning, protected area management, Interior Alaska, Denali
ENVISION Fact Sheet: Building a place-based understanding of social-ecological dynamics and their consequences for landscape change in the Denali region of Interior Alaska
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4386500
2020-12-23T00:27:14Z
user-inclusive-conservation
ENVISION
Andersson, Erik
Sellberg, My
Kuiper, Jan J.
2020-12-22
<p>Common to all human inhabited landscapes is that human management is an integral part of conservation. Positioning protected areas as embedded in and connected to the larger landscape also means extending the conservation efforts beyond protected area boundaries, acknowledging the diverse interactions between protected areas and adjacent land uses. This paper presents a collaborative approach to building a collective capacity to identify, evaluate, combine and adapt multiple coexisting strategies for resilient and inclusive conservation of cultural landscapes, exemplified by a pilot application in the mosaic landscape of Östergötland, Sweden. The paper is intended for planners, policy makers and other actors who seek to maintain and develop mixed multifunctional landscapes in a rapidly changing world.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4386500
oai:zenodo.org:4386500
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4386499
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
inclusive conservation
cultural landscapes
resilience
capacity building
Västra Harg
Östergötland, Sweden
Fact Sheet: Building capacity for resilient and inclusive conservation of cultural landscapes
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4680736
2022-04-19T01:49:31Z
user-inclusive-conservation
user-eu
López-Rodríguez, M
Oteros-Rozas, E.
Piñeiro, C.
March, H.
Ruíz-Mallén, I.
2021-04-12
<p>This report corresponds to ENVISION milestone 5.3., aiming to develop an online workshop for co-producing tools to support decision-making for inclusive governance in protected areas. The workshop involved 12 decision-makers of the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park and experts on protected areas management. Based on a collective reflection, they analyzed the main challenges and opportunities of the current participatory setting within protected areas’ governance, particularly in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park. They defined and prioritized management strategies supporting more socially inclusive conservation approaches and assessed 6 ENVISION research tools according to their applicability within the management cycle.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4680736
oai:zenodo.org:4680736
spa
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4680735
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
protected areas
national park
participatory governance
tools
decision-making
inclusive conservation
biodiversity
Envision Report: Co-producción de herramientas para promover gobernanza participativa y conservación inclusiva en espacios protegidos
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4527775
2022-02-24T13:49:43Z
user-inclusive-conservation
Dana N. Johnson
Carena J. van Riper
2021-02-22
<p>This ENVISION deliverable reports on findings from a participatory study focused on evaluating how residents living around Denali National Park and Preserve and Denali State Park perceived the social and ecological dynamics of protected areas in Interior Alaska, U.S. Using a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach, residents' mental models of Denali as a social-ecological system were used to establish a baseline understanding of the current state of conditions being influenced by drivers of change in the region.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4527775
oai:zenodo.org:4527775
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4527774
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
social-ecological systems
protected areas
resilience
mental models
community engagement
fuzzy cognitive mapping
ENVISION Deliverable 3.2: A social-ecological inventory of the region surrounding Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4304015
2020-12-04T00:27:08Z
user-inclusive-conservation
ENVISION
2019-11-21
<p>This paper summarizes the scientific basis for inclusive conservation in the context of protected area management, and provides an update on ENVISION’s activities in 2019. It is intended for members of ENVISION’s local and inter-site knowledge alliances so that they can better understand the scientific directions of the ENVISION project. The ideas presented in this paper will be further developed over the course of the project based on the data collated and the insights shared by alliance members.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304015
oai:zenodo.org:4304015
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304014
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
inclusive conservation, protected area management, inter-site knowledge alliances, biodiversity conservation
Fact Sheet - ENVISION's approach to inclusive conservation: A scientific overview and project update
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4304103
2020-12-04T00:27:08Z
user-inclusive-conservation
Filyushkina, Anna
ENVISION
2020-11-24
<p><strong>How visualized visions can help decision-makers to engage with stakeholders and to navigate towards sustainable protected area management strategies.</strong></p>
<p>This policy brief presents first findings from the case study area in the Netherlands – the Kromme Rijn region and Utrechtse Heuvelrug National Park, a multifunctional landscape with several PAs of different sizes and designation context, where we applied a set of tools from the inclusive conservation approach toolbox. Specifically, we conducted a series of interviews with local actors, targeting different groups such as local residents (at local town markets), recreationists and residents in the area (at a popular recreation spots) and representatives of the local government, NGOs and other relevant organizations (at their offices) to assess the following questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>What visions do people have for the area?</li>
<li>What conflicting interests do people see in the landscape?</li>
<li>Where do people see the landscape as multifunctional?</li>
</ol>
<p>Such participatory methods can be a useful set of tools to both understand the diversity of visions stakeholders have for the area, as well as to engage with stakeholders. Visualizing the plurality of visions and modeling potential conflict zones can be a helpful tool towards revealing where potential conflicts could occur and how to navigate them.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304103
oai:zenodo.org:4304103
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304102
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
biodiversity conservation, inclusive-conservation, protected areas, visions, modeling
Policy Brief: Projections of future impacts of visions on PA management strategies
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:3727712
2021-03-31T12:27:20Z
user-inclusive-conservation
López-Rodríguez, M.D.
Oteros-Rozas, E.
March, H.
Ruíz-Mallén, I.
2019-12-20
<p>This deliverable corresponds to ENVISION task 5.1, aiming to identify the governance arrangements behind protected areas (PAs) management, as well as the strengths and gaps in coordination across involved institutions, through a case study in a European PA: The Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain).</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3727712
oai:zenodo.org:3727712
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3727711
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Governance arrangements; Environmental governance; Formal procedures; Inclusive conservation; Informal routines; Participatory governance; Protected Areas; National Parks; Spain
ENVISION Deliverable 5.1.: Governance Arrangement Inventory
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4423119
2022-01-01T01:48:47Z
user-inclusive-conservation
Oteros-Rozas, E.
López-Rodríguez, M.D.
Heras, M.
Piñeiro, C.
March, H
Lo, V.B.
Ruíz-Mallén, I.
2020-12-23
<p>This report corresponds to ENVISION milestone 5.3., aiming to develop a workshop for participatory scenario planning to reflect on five possible future scenarios for the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). The participatory scenario planning exercise involved a two-day online workshop with 45 participants, including decision-makers, researchers, local users, non-governmental organizations, and other social actors. On the basis of a common assessment of the current socio-ecological conditions and the factors driving change in recent years, they considered what could happen in the next twenty years. The stakeholders discussed whether and how the area might continue to contribute to the quality of life of those who currently enjoy the ecosystem services it provides. Further, by identifying the advantages and disadvantages of the envisioned future scenarios, who would lose or gain in the respective future scenarios was assessed. The stakeholders prioritized several strategies to realize their desired futures for the National Park.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4423119
oai:zenodo.org:4423119
spa
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4423118
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
protected area, national park, future, visions, scenarios, participatory, conflicts, conservation, biodiversity, recreation
Imaginando colectivamente el futuro del Parque Nacional Sierra de Guadarrama y su contexto socio-ecológico
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:3674738
2021-03-01T00:27:15Z
user-inclusive-conservation
Andersson, E.
Andrade, R.
Cebrian-Piqueras, M.A.
Johnson, D.N.
Keller, R.
Lo, V.B.
March, H.
Milcu, A.
Oteros-Rozas, E.
Plieninger, T.
Raymond, C.M.
Ruiz-Mallen, I.
Zaman, S.
van Riper, C.
Filyushkina, A.
Verburg, P.
2020-02-19
<p>The ENVISION project develops, tests and validates a novel trans-disciplinary scenario approach for engaging multiple stakeholders and local communities in the protected area management and biodiversity decision-making at multiple scales (refer to our <a href="https://inclusive-conservation.org/the-project/">website</a> for a more detailed overview of the approach).</p>
<p>This deliverable presents findings from the first step within the inclusive conservation approach – identification of main visions for the four study areas. Three study areas are located in Europe (Netherlands, Spain and Sweden) and one in North America (Alaska, USA). </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3674738
oai:zenodo.org:3674738
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3674737
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
protected area
vision
participatory planning
biodiversity
ENVISION Deliverable 2.1: Visions for each protected area
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:3706436
2021-03-01T00:27:15Z
user-inclusive-conservation
Andersson, Erik
2020-03-11
<p>The ENVISION literature review on uncertainty with conservation planning and managemet is made up by several tiers, where Deliverable 4.1 constitute tie A, and the latter steps under development to support and feed into the later WP 4 deliverables and final publications:</p>
<p>Overview: Approaches, frameworks and strategies to addressing uncertainty in formal nature protection and conservation. The first review provides information on current emphasis, gaps, or indications where there might be an alternative literature that needs to be identified and explored (relevant knowledge not yet fully connected to conservation planning).</p>
<p>Qualitative analysis (next step – towards D4.3): What uncertainties are recognised and what remedies are suggested (qualitative systematic review)</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Potential frameworks: IPBES, CAS</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Evidence, actors and governance</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Forecasting and strategy</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Boundary conditions</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Cross scale and cross boundary interactions</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Management and practice</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Drivers</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Application in practice (still to be decided): Existing frameworks in our case study countries/EU and USA (policy/document analysis (in combination with limited systematic reviews)) and how they treat the emergent themes from A and B.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Natura 2000</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>National Parks</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>MAB</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>National nature protection frameworks</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3706436
oai:zenodo.org:3706436
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3706435
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
uncertainty, conservation planning and managemet, nature protection, review
Uncertainty, knowledge and actor agency in nature conservation: A systematic qualitative review and assessment
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4693868
2021-04-22T13:53:35Z
user-inclusive-conservation
user-eu
López-Rodríguez, M.D.
Oteros-Rozas, E.
March, H
Ruíz-Mallén, I.
Lo, V.B.P.G.
Cebrián-Piqueras, M.A.
Battioni Romanelli, B.
Arroyo Schnell, A.
2021-04-15
<p>The Sierra de Guadarrama National Park is located in the Central Mountain System of the Iberian Peninsula. It was established in 2013, becoming Spain's newest national park. This National Park covers 34,000 hectares across the regions of Madrid (64% of the territory) and Castilla y León. The National Park’s authority in the area is intertwined with the different scales of decision-making of multiple state administrations. To compound this complexity, the Sierra de Guadarrama is the second most visited national park in Spain, and there are a great variety of local stakeholders engaged in diverse activities such as outdoor sports, extensive livestock farming, and environmental conservation, education and research. The multiple and sometimes competing uses and values create social tensions around how the park should be governed. Researchers are conducting research to provide practical guidance to understand, navigate and consider different visions, preferences, tensions, responsibilities and power relations between stakeholders, in order to move towards better social engagement in conservation decision-making. </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4693868
oai:zenodo.org:4693868
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4693867
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Protected areas, governance, inclusive conservation, biodiversity, values, policy tools, stakeholders, scenario planning, Spain
Fact Sheet: Promoting inclusive conservation in protected areas
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
oai:zenodo.org:4304053
2020-12-04T00:27:08Z
user-inclusive-conservation
ENVISION
Andersson, Erik
Kuiper, Jan
Sellberg, My
2020-06-15
<p>Västra Harg Lövskogar nature reserve and its surrounding cultural landscape in Mjölby Municipality presents an excellent case study highlighting the importance of boundaries – in the biophysical landscape as well as in its governance and use – for landscape multifunctionality and capacity to deal with changes. Central to our work is<strong> knowledge</strong> and <strong>understanding</strong>, and through it, <strong>agency</strong>.</p>
<p>In the Swedish case study the ENVISION project team will develop a participatory process for building a shared understanding of landscape management challenges. Together with local actors, we will jointly explore what may constitute strategies towards solutions, how an awareness of uncertainties may influence implementation, and ways to adapt when new challenges emerge.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304053
oai:zenodo.org:4304053
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/inclusive-conservation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304052
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Västra Harg Lövskogar, nature reserve, participatory process, biodiversity conservation, inclusive-conservation, protected areas
Fact Sheet ENVISION: promoting inclusive conservation in protected areas. From a shared understanding of problems and solutions toward resilient landscape strategies for Västra Hargs Lövskogar nature reserve and its surrounding cultural landscape in Mjölby Municipality (Sweden).
info:eu-repo/semantics/report