2024-03-28T18:24:48Z
https://zenodo.org/oai2d
oai:zenodo.org:3514989
2020-01-20T16:56:04Z
openaire
user-force2019
Melanie Imming
2019-10-21
<p>Recently, a task group of the Dutch National Coordination Point RDM (LCRDM) delivered a report on data stewardship. Within the LCDRM, experts collaborate in task groups on RDM topics that are too large for one institution to solve and which need a coordinated national approach. Taking into account prevailing uncertainty about the interpretation of data stewardship, the objective of this task force was to provide insight into the demands currently made of data stewards by Dutch institutes, and the solutions that have been developed and implemented for them. The report was realized by various means:</p>
<ul>
<li>Studying international literature in this field</li>
<li>Analysing a total of twenty-two vacancies</li>
<li>Surveying staff from more than 30 research organizations using a questionnaire</li>
<li>Conducting follow-up interviews with eight data experts from the professional field, in order to evaluate the survey findings and ask more in-depth questions</li>
</ul>
<p>This gave a clear picture of how data stewardship was being implemented at Dutch institutes, as well as guidance on what currently works and what more is needed. The report offers a basis for clearer job descriptions of data stewardship roles and will also help institutions to implement data stewardship locally.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514989
oai:zenodo.org:3514989
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514988
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open Science; data stewardship;
DATA STEWARDSHIP ON THE MAP: A STUDY OF TASK AND ROLES IN DUTCH RESEARCH INSTITUTES
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3502870
2020-01-20T17:42:59Z
openaire
user-force2019
Heibi, Ivan
2019-10-18
<p>This is a presentation I gave at FORCE2019, talking about the new OpenCitations dataset: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. (<a href="https://force2019.sched.com/event/U2mv/coci-the-opencitations-index-of-crossref-open-doi-to-doi-citations">https://force2019.sched.com/event/U2mv/coci-the-opencitations-index-of-crossref-open-doi-to-doi-citations</a>)</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3502870
oai:zenodo.org:3502870
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3502869
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
dataset
open citations
OpenCitations
Crossref
Citations
COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3501793
2020-01-20T16:19:13Z
openaire
user-force2019
Tatum, Clifford
Nordling, Josephine
2019-10-18
<p>Implementation of Open Science policy should involve a corresponding improvements in the recognition of contributions to open scholarship, which are currently often unnoticed. Knowledge Exchange (<a href="http://knowledge-exchange.info/">http://knowledge-exchange.info</a>) has established the Working Group on Open Scholarship and Research Evaluation in order to address a move towards a greater awareness of open scholarship contributions, proposing the concept of an "Openness Profile". This profile is a way to document contributions to open scholarship and includes procedures for self-publishing these contributions as a digital object with a persistent identifier. It also provides information on the strategic use of contemporary research information infrastructure to promote the published contributions. The link to infrastructure is also intended to ensure that the profile is discoverable and readable by both humans and machines. We envisage the openness profile as a collection of documented contributions with a DOI, linked to the contributor’s ORCID. By intervening at the level of infrastructure, the openness profile is able to provide resources that will be useful not only to those presently contributing to open scholarship, but also available for (and adaptable to) future institutional needs associated with top-down research policy initiatives.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501793
oai:zenodo.org:3501793
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501792
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
open scholarship
research evaluation
persistent identifiers
information systems
Resources for recognizing and rewarding contributions to open scholarship
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3517789
2020-01-20T17:15:46Z
openaire
user-force2019
user-nlesc
Anton Akhmerov
Maria Cruz
Niels Drost
Cees Hof
Tomas Knapen
Mateusz Kuzak
Carlos Martinez-Ortiz
Yasemin Turkyilmaz-van der Velden
Ben van Werkhoven
2019-10-24
<p>Research software is fundamental to contemporary research. Yet it does not receive the recognition it rightly deserves. Research software is not adequately recognised in the scholarly record through citation. There’s lack of funding and incentives for those who develop research software. The acknowledgment of the importance of research software as an independent research output lags behind that of research data and research publications. To raise the profile of research software at the policy level in The Netherlands, we gathered a group of researchers, research software engineers, data stewards, academic librarians and services providers from several institutions across the country. Our first step was to present the case for making research software a first class citizen in research to the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), the national research council of the Netherlands. Our next step is to write a position paper making recommendations to funding agencies and research institutions. This position paper will be open for consultation to the research community in the Netherlands. In this paper, we argue that if open science is to truly lead towards better, more transparent, and reproducible research, then research software needs to be treated in equal footing to research data and publications at the policy level. This collaborative effort - its aims, activities, and outputs - will be the focus of our presentation. The author has no conflicts of interest.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3517789
oai:zenodo.org:3517789
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/nlesc
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3517788
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Research Software
Policy
Software Sustainability
Raising the Profile of Research Software Through Collaboration
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497126
2020-01-20T16:51:00Z
openaire
user-force2019
Levchenko, Maria
2019-10-17
<p>With preprints gaining traction, defining the best practices and community standards becomes crucial for moving forward. Europe PMC, a database of biomedical publications, started indexing preprints alongside traditional journal articles in July 2018. In this poster we share lessons learnt from our experience working with preprints, as well as touch on the opportunities and challenges related to preprint management. Aggregating preprints from various sources has surfaced the differences in practices among preprint servers, the harmonization of which would require community input and cooperation. The ultimate question we want to explore is, “what does a preprint of the future look like?”</p>
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9977192.v1
oai:zenodo.org:3497126
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
preprints, biology, metadata
The Future of Preprints: Challenges and Opportunities
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497155
2020-01-20T13:15:02Z
openaire
user-force2019
Martin J Brennan
Osman Aldirdiri
Natasha Simons
2019-10-17
<p>The FORCE11 Scholarly Communication Institute (FSCI - <a href="https://www.force11.org/fsci">https://www.force11.org/fsci</a>) had its third session in August 2019. FSCI emerged from a belief that it was no longer enough to bring communities together to discuss and advance the cutting edge; we need to transfer knowledge, understanding and purpose among the diverse communities that will implement the future of scholarly communications. The first two years of FSCI ran at University of California, San Diego, and were vital to get the institute up and running. The 2019 edition was run at a new location and with a new collaborative partner, the library of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). As we look ahead to year four, FSCI collaborators are working to clarify and expand the purpose and effectiveness of the institute. This talk will feature Natasha Simons (Australia Research Data Commons), Martin Brennan (UCLA Library), and Osman Aldirdiri (University of Khartoum). We will give an overview of the brief-but-exciting history of FSCI, and discuss some of the issues that have arisen and which are shaping our future direction. Attendees are encouraged to share their own hopes for FSCI and will learn how they can become more active partners in its development.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497155
oai:zenodo.org:3497155
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497154
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 16-17, 2019
Scholarly Communication, FORCE11, UCLA
FSCI: Reflections and Directions at Year Three
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3514955
2020-01-20T17:22:45Z
openaire
user-force2019
Parkin, Michael
Levchenko, Maria
McEntyre, Jo
2019-10-14
<p>Europe PMC, a database of life science research literature, incorporates the first open, global grant IDs into its workflows. In a collaborative effort between Crossref, Wellcome (one of the Europe PMC funders), and Europe PMC, the first global grant IDs have been registered for Wellcome grants. Wellcome recently joined Crossref through a new type of membership developed specifically for this purpose. Europe PMC registers global grant IDs for Wellcome-funded awards with Crossref on behalf of the funding agency, and provides the necessary metadata based on the information in its grant database. The grant IDs resolve to the corresponding grant record on the Europe PMC website. The aim of this development is to make it easier to unambiguously and effectively track the impact of research funding, ensure transparency of the funding information and simplify linking to research outputs, such as research publications.</p>
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9977318.v1
oai:zenodo.org:3514955
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
grants
PIDs
FORCE2019
Crossref
Global Grant IDs in Europe PMC
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3501181
2020-01-20T17:23:07Z
openaire
user-force2019
Jimenez, Ivo
2019-10-17
<p>Reproducibility is the cornerstone of the scientific method. Yet, in the computational and data-intensive branches of science, a gap exists between current practices and the ideal of having every new scientific discovery be easily reproducible. At the root of this problem are the dysfunctional forms of communication between the distinct stakeholders of science: researchers, their peers, students, librarians and other consumers of research outcomes working in ad-hoc ways. These groups of individuals are organized as independent silos, sharing minimal information between them, all of them with the common task of publishing, obtaining, re-executing and validating experimentation workflows associated with scientific claims contained in scholarly articles and technical reports.<br>
<br>
In this talk, we characterize the practical challenges associated to the research lifecycle - creation, dissemination, validation, curation and re-use of scientific explorations - and draw analogies with similar problems experienced by software engineering communities in the early 2000s. DevOps, the state-of-the-art software delivery methodology currently followed by companies and open source communities, appeared in late 2000s to address these issues. In the past two years, we have been applying the DevOps methodology to implement scientific explorations in multiple domains, such as earth science, genomics and computer systems. As a result, we are able to frame the problem of research delivery, i.e. iterating the research lifecycle, as a problem of software delivery. This makes it possible to repurpose the DevOps methodology to address the practical challenges faced by experimenters across the domains of computational and data-intensive science. We use the term SciOps to refer to a new set of principles that emerge. In this talk, we will present a case study that illustrates how to apply these principles when carrying out scientific explorations. In addition, we will introduce and survey existing tools that help practitioners to follow SciOps principles.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501181
oai:zenodo.org:3501181
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501180
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
reproducibility
devops
sciops
openscience
SciOps: Accelerating Science Delivery by Following DevOps-Inspired Principles
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3515895
2020-01-20T17:09:33Z
openaire
user-force2019
Penfold, Naomi
Taraborelli, Dario
Bloom, Theodora
Kenall, Amye
Debat, Humberto
2019-10-22
<p>This presentation was given on Wednesday October 16 at FORCE2019: <a href="https://sched.co/U2oo">https://sched.co/U2oo</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p>
<p>The landscape of preprints in biology and chemistry is changing rapidly: at least eight new preprint servers have launched in the past year alone, established by journals, publishing vendors, scientific societies and research communities. Moreover, several conservative publishers now permit or even promote preprints, while the more progressive publishers and infrastructure providers support preprint adoption with interoperability and awareness. The significant and continued growth in preprinting at bioRxiv (<a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/">https://www.biorxiv.org/</a>) as well as the initiation of numerous other preprint-related initiatives in recent years may be evidence enough that the principle of preprints has been proven.</p>
<p>However, the conceptual vision for preprints in the life sciences - and current progress toward this vision - may vary depending on who you ask. For example, preprint server operators, journal publishers, preprinters and preprint readers, funders, policymakers and advocates may all have different normative ideals concerning:</p>
<ul>
<li>What material should be preprinted?</li>
<li>When should preprints be preprinted, relative to publication?</li>
<li>What kind of feedback should be collected on preprints and how authors respond to it?</li>
<li>How and by whom should preprints be filtered and curated, creating reputational indicators that feed into research evaluation mechanisms?</li>
<li>How should preprints be reused?</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, the future of preprints is uncertain. The rate of growth in preprint submissions is higher than that of publications, yet only 1 in 50 biomedical publications is preprinted today and adoption is highly variable between research communities; for example, a third of recent submissions to bioRxiv are from neuroscientists, bioinformaticians and microbiologists. While one funder (the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative - <a href="https://chanzuckerberg.com/">https://chanzuckerberg.com/</a>) mandates preprints, there is a call for more funders to follow suit (Plan U - <a href="http://planu.org/">http://planu.org/</a>). Meanwhile, the advocacy and adoption conversations we have and hear about at Accelerating Science and Publication in Biology (ASAPbio - <a href="https://asapbio.org/">https://asapbio.org/</a>) remain dominated by fears relating to research evaluation and misuse: fears of scooping (including the perception of someone else unfairly gaining from your work), journal rejection, and the repercussions of finding errors in one’s own work and sharing erroneous science by others.</p>
<p>At this point, it is important to reflect together critically on:</p>
<ul>
<li>What would successful adoption of preprints in biology look like to you? </li>
<li>What do current preprinting practices (the who, how, where, when and why of posting and interacting with preprints) tell us about progress towards this vision for success, and the drivers and blockers influencing adoption?</li>
<li>Who makes the decisions about how preprinting is delivered, technically and socially? </li>
<li>What are some possible unintended consequences of these decisions and is anyone mitigating these?</li>
<li>For whom do preprints not automatically work? For whom and by whom are they built, and who is not included?</li>
<li>What may threaten the success of preprints in biology?</li>
</ul>
<p>Through an informal Q&A style conversation with representatives of different stakeholders, we will explore these questions as well as further questions from the audience. The intention of this panel session is to support transparency and meaningful collaboration between stakeholders, in a way that champions the productive adoption of preprinting in the biomedical and life sciences.</p>
<p>The panel for this session consists of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Theodora Bloom, executive editor of the BMJ and co-founder of MedRxiv</li>
<li>Amye Kenall, editorial director for medicine and life sciences journals at Springer Nature</li>
<li>Dario Taraborelli, science program officer at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative</li>
<li>Humberto Debat, researcher at the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (Argentina)</li>
<li>Naomi Penfold (moderator), associate director at ASAPbio</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Additional information</strong></p>
<p>This presentation is available to view and reuse with Google slides from <a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1sn_uLVmZSpHHfIqlCzebaleNTcoMN7zUjMeMUimdopw/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1sn_uLVmZSpHHfIqlCzebaleNTcoMN7zUjMeMUimdopw/edit?usp=sharing</a> (short link: <a href="http://bit.ly/preprints-FORCE2019">http://bit.ly/preprints-FORCE2019</a>).</p>
<p>Reuse is permitted under the CC-BY 4.0 license, with attribution to ASAPbio or the panellists as indicated in the slide notes in the Google slides version and the uploaded Powerpoint file.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515895
oai:zenodo.org:3515895
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515894
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, UK, 15-17 October 2019
preprints
open science
biomedical science publishing
Who will influence the success of preprints in biology and to what end?
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3497096
2020-01-20T16:42:58Z
openaire
user-force2019
Murray 🦇, Matthew
Tyschenko, Emily
Regier, Ryan
2019-10-16
<p>The open access movement has become a part of the status quo in academia, but how important is it to the general public? This talk summarises the results of efforts by the University of Guelph, who began by running a successful workshop at the university on how to access scholarly literature after graduation, and who have now established partnerships with the public library and a local community space in order to run sessions on accessing scholarly literature and the current challenges of information access.</p>
Slides from the presentation discussed in this session can be found at https://zenodo.org/record/3375672
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497096
oai:zenodo.org:3497096
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497095
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2019-10-15 - 2019-10-17
scholarly communication, sci-hub, public access, repositories
Bringing Open Scholarship and Open Education to the Public through an Academic/Public Library Collaboration
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3484154
2020-01-20T17:00:20Z
openaire
user-force2019
Zenodo RDM Collaborators
Holmes, Kristi
Holm Nielsen, Lars
2019-10-13
<p>Research Data Management (RDM) platforms play an important role in todays research ecosystem to disseminate and archive, enable reproducibility, and empower reuse. RDM platforms allow researchers to share and preserve scientific results and support the sharing of a wide variety of resources, from publications and presentations to datasets, software, policy documents, and workflows. Research funding agencies around the world have also recognized the huge potential economic and social benefits of RDMs and support their use in research preservation and dissemination. CERN has partnered with more than 10 international multidisciplinary institutions and companies to build a turn-key open source research data management platform called Invenio RDM, and grow a diverse community to sustain the platform. We seek to make Invenio RDM a world-leading extensible research data management platform used by research institutions all around the world and with businesses providing services, support and customizations on top of Invenio RDM. Invenio RDM includes existing Zenodo features, such as DOI minting capabilities, versioning support, and COUNTER compliant usage statistics, to name a few. Transforming Zenodo into a general purpose RDM-platform will focus on improvements to the core repository (especially to support next-generation repository standards), packaging and distribution to support easy implementation, and customization and extendability. This presentation will provide an update to the community about this work, describe our development roadmap, share interdisciplinary key use cases for this work, and gather real-time audience input.</p>
<p>This work is supported by the CERN Knowledge Transfer Fund; participating partners (to date) include: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Caltech Library, Data Futures, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Northwestern University, OpenAIRE, TIND, Tübitak, Universität Hamburg, and the University of Münster; and the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number U24TR002306, to the US Center for Data to Health (CD2H).</p>
Another copy is deposited in the Northwestern DigitalHub at https://digitalhub.northwestern.edu/files/71b8b0b1-45a8-4582-85f2-7c8d8a74e5a5
https://doi.org/10.18131/g3-a4pk-je15
oai:zenodo.org:3484154
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Invenio RDM
Research Data Management
Institutional Repository
Data
Informatics
Data Index
Invenio RDM: A collaborative, community-driven research data management platform
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3523257
2020-01-20T16:48:27Z
openaire
user-force2019
Arighi, Cecilia
Wang, Michael
Huang, Hongzhan
Wu, Cathy
McGarvey, Peter
UniProt, Consortium
2019-10-30
<p>Poster about UniProt engagement with different communities (database, research and text mining communities) to create the additional bibliography set for UniProt protein entries. This set is a collection of publications (some with annotations) complementary to the ones present in the knowledgebase. This enables the access to a more comprehensive set of publications for protein entries and help scaling-up curation.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3523257
oai:zenodo.org:3523257
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3523256
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Database
Publications
Community
Engaging the Community to Expand Protein Literature Representation and Annotations in UniProt
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497090
2020-01-20T16:41:39Z
openaire
user-force2019
Lammey, Rachael
Cousijn, Helena
2019-10-17
<p>The panel for this session consists of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Catriona MacCallum, Hindawi</li>
<li>Daniella Lowenberg, California Digital Library</li>
<li>Helena Cousijn, DataCite</li>
<li>John Chodacki, California Digital Library (moderator)</li>
<li>Martin Fenner, DataCite</li>
<li>Rachael Lammey, Crossref</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
The underlying data created (and/or reused and remixed) for research is becoming as crucial as the resulting text-based output - that’s not up for debate. However, what merits discussion is how our various communities can continue to work together to support the sharing, linking and citation of data. Despite all previous efforts and panel discussions, we’re still not there yet.<br>
<br>
There are a number of key parts to this, and collaboration is key to making these parts work together so that the research community can realise the benefits that accurate, acknowledged article/data linking:</p>
<ul>
<li>education for researchers on data publishing</li>
<li>encouragement and support for researchers who want to publish data</li>
<li>changes in policies and workflows for publishers and repositories</li>
<li>provision of infrastructure to collect and disseminate this information</li>
<li>development of initiatives and tools to measure data usage and data citations</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
In that vein, this panel session will dig into the what, the why, and the how of data sharing and data citation. The panel will include representatives from the perspectives of publishers, repositories, infrastructure developers and industry, who will provide an update on how things have developed since the FORCE11 Data Citation Principles first came out, and who will discuss the lessons learned from collaborations within the Data Citation Implementation pilot. We’ll discuss where things stand with data sharing and data citation today, what the issues are, whether we are ready to start taking steps towards data metrics and what we need to do to finally start supporting data with the same rigour as we support other scholarly outputs.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497090
oai:zenodo.org:3497090
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497089
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Data usage, citation, sharing, and metrics
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3497402
2021-01-27T00:39:21Z
openaire
user-force2019
Deardorff, Ariel
2019-10-17
<p>The Library, Graduate Division, and Open Science Group at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) collaborated in the Fall of 2019 on a credit-bearing workshop series on biomedical reproducibility. The series was targeted at UCSF graduate students and researchers and designed to satisfy NIH Rigor and Reproducibility requirements. In addition to covering open data, open code, open protocols, and open access, this workshop series included sessions on designing rigorous experiments, engaging with new forms of peer review, and building a reproducible lab. The goal of this project was for subject experts to provide hands-on training that will improve research workflows, stimulate conversations about open science and research reproducibility, and build an open curriculum that can be replicated by other institutions. This talk describes this innovative workshop series and reports on pre-workshop assessments of researchers' knowledge and behaviors regarding reproducibility.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497402
oai:zenodo.org:3497402
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497401
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Force2019, 16-17 October 2019
reproducibility
biomedical research
open science
academic libraries
A Reproducibility Workshop Series for Biomedical Researchers
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3514445
2020-01-20T17:24:47Z
openaire
user-force2019
Surkis, Alisa
2019-10-20
<p>It is not realistic to expect that all biomedical and health sciences researchers will acquire the skills needed to apply data science techniques to their work. However, these researchers are all going to have to function in a research environment where the use of data science techniques is increasingly important. Collaborations between data scientists and researchers with domain expertise afford new opportunities. However, a lack of researcher awareness about data science can result in missed opportunities for collaboration, and differences in perspective and language can result in failed collaborations. Seeing no existing curricula that met the specific need identified, we developed a class to bridge that gap - Data Science for Non-Data Scientists. The class explains the possibilities, techniques, and terminology of data science, as well as conveying its limitations such as issues of interpretation, implementation and bias. This presentation will describe the motivation for developing the class, outline the approach taken and the elements of the class, describe the different settings in which it has been taught within our institution, and detail the outcomes of the class.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514445
oai:zenodo.org:3514445
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514444
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Training biomedical researchers to effectively collaborate with data scientists
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3507812
2020-01-20T16:47:45Z
openaire
user-force2019
Gadd, Elizabeth
2019-10-18
<p>Presentation on responsible metrics given at the FORCE 2019 conference in Edinburgh on Wednesday 16 October, 2019.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507812
oai:zenodo.org:3507812
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507811
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode
Responsible metrics
Bibliometrics
Research Evaluation
Responsible metrics: the state of the art
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3504643
2020-01-20T15:03:01Z
openaire
user-force2019
GĂĽnter Waibel
2019-10-18
<p>Closing Keynote of the Force11 2019 conference in Edinburgh, Scotland, presented October 17 2019. The talk lays out the "many pathways to open access" strategy the University of California has embraced, and describes negotiations for transformative open access publisher agreements as one of those pathways. The University of California's stand-off with Elsevier emerges as a key event that has re-energized other pathways (OA policy, infrastructure, data publishing) at the UC, and opened up a far-ranging debate in North America about the cost of scholarly communications, as well as the value of open access.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3504643
oai:zenodo.org:3504643
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3504642
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
open access
transformative agreements
cost of knowledge
Pathways to Open Access – UC's big-tent approach to transforming scholarly communications
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3515442
2020-01-20T17:31:09Z
openaire
user-force2019
Dario Taraborelli
2019-10-21
<p>Open source software is a key ingredient of modern science. Hundreds of software packages, libraries and applications have become essential tools for biomedical research. However, despite their importance, the majority of these tools are undervalued and often lack funding for maintenance, growth, development and community engagement ,  especially after their initial phase.<br>
<br>
In 2019, we designed and launched a new <a href="https://medium.com/@cziscience/essential-open-source-software-for-science-72faec2c38c1">grants program</a> to support open source projects that are critical to science. Funding from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative will provide projects with resources to support their tools and the communities behind them, whether fixing bugs, improving documentation, addressing usability, managing the project, or building community. To complement existing efforts, we will be supporting both domain-specific tools, and cross-cutting foundational tools and infrastructure. We will also not require that proposed work be linked to novel research. In designing this program, we sought advice from several experts on scientific software and open source sustainability, in an effort to ensure that this program meets the needs of its community.<br>
<br>
This talk will cover the challenges faced and lessons learned during the design and launch of the program. It will also be an opportunity for participants to engage with us and critically analyze possibilities for supporting scientific open source software in the future.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515442
oai:zenodo.org:3515442
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515441
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
open source
research software
sustainability
open science
Essential Open Source Software for Science: Lessons learned in designing a program to sustain the computational foundations of modern biomedicine
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3497130
2020-01-20T16:45:41Z
openaire
user-force2019
Nicole Vasilevsky
Seth Carbon
Robin Champieux
Julie McMurry
Lilly Winfree
Letisha Wyatt
Melissa Haendel
2019-10-17
<p>Poster presentation at Force2019, October 16-17, 2019, Edinburgh, UK.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497130
oai:zenodo.org:3497130
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497129
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213090, (2019-10-17)
licensing
data sharing
data reuse
biomedical data
Evaluating scientific data licensing with the (Re)usable Data Project
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3520291
2020-01-20T16:59:16Z
openaire
user-force2019
Hamelin, Marjolaine
Bourguet, Denis
Facon, Benoît
Guillemaud, Thomas
2019-10-28
<p>The current system of scientific publication is faced with several serious problems: its cost and lack of transparency and the long time from the obtainment of scientific results to their publication. We also believe that the economic model on which the current publishing system is based perverts the system. We have created Peer Community In (PCI)—<a href="https://peercommunityin.org/">https://peercommunityin.org/</a> ; <a href="https://youtu.be/4PZhpnc8wwo—to">https://youtu.be/4PZhpnc8wwo—to</a> tackle all these problems. This project is based on the publication of critical evaluations and recommendations of articles that have not yet been published, but are freely available in electronic form from open archives on the Internet, in which they have been deposited. These evaluations and recommendations are performed by researchers acting on a voluntary basis with no links to private publishers. Publication costs disappear: PCI validates, distributes and allows consultation of the articles submitted free of charge. The time lag to information access is eliminated: the scientific articles evaluated are deposited in open archives as soon as they are written. The system becomes transparent: reviews, editorial decisions, authors’ responses and recommendations are published on the website of the scientific community concerned (e.g. PCI Evolutionary Biology, PCI Ecology, PCI Paleontology…).</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3520291
oai:zenodo.org:3520291
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3520290
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, 15-17 October, 2019
Peer-review
Preprints
Open science
Publication
Peer Community In: a free process for the recommendation of preprints based on peer review
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3510306
2020-01-20T17:06:54Z
openaire
user-force2019
Samantha Teplitzky
2019-10-17
<p>In 2019, librarians at the University of California, Berkeley, began a pilot program to introduce open science workflows. The Earth and Planetary Sciences (EPS) Department was chosen as the target department for this work due to prior connections and its relatively small graduate cohorts. The program began with an overhaul of the library's traditional orientation session, replacing content focused on library policies, procedures and resources with a new approach that instead addresses opportunities for open practices within local research workflows. Through collaboration with the department chair, faculty graduate student advisors and the graduate student affairs officer, the library constructed a year-long curriculum on open science practices and reproducibility within the Earth Sciences. This talk will address the challenges of introducing open science practices on a large campus, describing the opportunities and obstacles encountered while working with a small graduate cohort.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510306
oai:zenodo.org:3510306
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510305
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Force2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, 15-17 October 2019
Hanging out your open science shingle: launching an open science program by supporting a new graduate cohort
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3502988
2020-01-20T15:34:08Z
user-force2019
Jon Tennant
2019-10-18
<p>Presentation delivered at FORCE11 in October 2019.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3502988
oai:zenodo.org:3502988
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3502987
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
How to foster a community-led cultural shift towards open scholarship
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
oai:zenodo.org:3515915
2020-09-01T18:54:08Z
openaire
user-force2019
Holmes, Kristi
Vasilevsky, Nicole
2019-10-13
<p>Poster about the Architecting Attribution project, supported by the US NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number U24TR002306.</p>
Also available at https://digitalhub.northwestern.edu/files/d08374e9-0411-4450-a0d1-4979c69ed3e7
https://doi.org/10.18131/g3-y9vt-7376
oai:zenodo.org:3515915
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
attribution
credit
CREDITLAND: How to enhance attribution to make more meaningful connections for everyone to their roles, work, & impact
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3507283
2020-01-20T16:59:49Z
openaire
user-force2019
Rumsey, Sally
2019-10-10
<p>The University of Oxford has a strategic commitment to support open research. Examples of existing open research practice can be found across the institution. The University is keen to understand and learn from existing examples, and to provide models for others considering adopting open practices. As part of its support for open research, and in collaboration with the academics involved, the Bodleian Libraries have documented four contrasting exemplars of open research in action. The case studies represent research from the four academic divisions of the University. This presentation will describe the open research aspects of the four case studies, and the opportunities for the Bodleian Libraries to support the open activities of the researchers working on the projects, as part of the broader University strategy.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507283
oai:zenodo.org:3507283
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507282
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode
Open Science
Open Research
Open Scholarship
Case studies
Open Scholarship case studies at the University of Oxford
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3482933
2020-01-20T17:06:04Z
openaire
user-force2019
Debat, Humberto
Babini, Dominique
2019-10-11
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>“We share the spirit of Plan S in achieving immediate and full Open Access (OA) of scholarly publishing, but we disagree with its implementation guidelines. We consider that while this initiative will influence the publishing ecosystem worldwide, its design has ignored more than 20 years of agenda on OA from the Global South, and the paradigm of a contrasting scholarly publishing landscape in Latin America. Our region represents the largest worldwide adopter of OA practices, where publishing is led by the scholarly community in collaborative and cooperative platforms, and access to knowledge is considered a universal right. The community sustains and encourages a tradition of free-to-publish and free-to-read OA publishing, which reverberates in an unparalleled apprehension of the scholarly record by students, researchers, and the public. In our opinion, the guidelines of Plan S fail to tackle the essential and chronic issues of traditional scholarly publishing, such as the concentration of articles in large international commercial publishers with extraordinary profit margins. It is our belief that to contribute to the democratization of knowledge, funders must promote policies, actions and resources to implement OA while improving the quality and retaining control of scholarly editorial processes by the scholarly community. Plan S is yet to demonstrate that it will also (financially) support the advancement of non-commercial OA initiatives. We call to interpellate asymmetrical discussions where privileged institutions and funders commit the global scholarly publishing landscape. We urge funding agencies to embrace an inclusive agenda that proposes a fair, equilibrated and rational ecosystem for the future of academic publishing. In the meantime, we call our region to postpone its potential adhesion to Plan S until its first evaluation would verify and inform results and implications for less privileged researchers, countries and institutions.”</p>
<p><strong>Further background information about this poster is available at</strong>: </p>
<p><a href="https://peerj.com/preprints/27834/">https://peerj.com/preprints/27834/</a> , <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02857-1">https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02857-1</a> and <a href="https://tinyurl.com/y2zp5akl">https://tinyurl.com/y2zp5akl</a> </p>
<p> </p>
Poster presented at FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Oct 15-17 2019.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3482933
oai:zenodo.org:3482933
eng
Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27834v2
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02857-1
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3482932
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, UK, 15-17 October 2019
Plan S
Latin America
Open Access
Open Knowledge
Scholarly publishing
Article Processing Charges
Non-commercial publishing
Scientific Journals
cOAlition S
Scientific digital repositories
AmeliCA
Redalyc
LA Referencia
CLACSO
Plan S in Latin America: Primum non nocere
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3508624
2020-01-20T15:24:47Z
openaire
user-force2019
Casci, Tanita
McCutcheon, Valerie
2019-10-18
<p>The talk presents a mini case study of implementing the CRediT taxonomy (<a href="https://www.casrai.org/credit.html">https://www.casrai.org/credit.html</a>), which is a controlled vocabulary to represent the roles that collaborators can have when contributing to research outputs. Examples include supervision, software programming or writing an original draft of a paper. It is one of many tools that help to facilitate open research. Few universities have embedded CRediT so far, but several more are now on the point of adoption. The talk will cover the what and how of the case study, as well as some lessons learned and suggestions for the future.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3508624
oai:zenodo.org:3508624
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3508623
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
CRediT: Recognising author contributions to publications
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3497261
2019-10-17T14:53:28Z
user-force2019
Chue Hong, Neil P.
Fenner, Martin
Katz, Daniel S.
2019-10-17
<p>The FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation working group has been developing practical guidance in the form of checklists, which are aimed at authors, reviewers, developers, editors and publishers. The checklists help these audiences to implement software citation principles in their workflows. This talk will give a quick introduction to these checklists and explain how they can be used to improve the practice of open research by giving credit for software.</p>
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9971402
oai:zenodo.org:3497261
eng
Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3479199
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3482769
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
software citation
Checklists for Software Citation: what you need to know
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
oai:zenodo.org:3515864
2020-01-20T17:24:07Z
openaire
user-force2019
Schultze-Motel, Paul
2019-10-22
<p>An internal workshop of the Helmholtz Association on research data management and information infrastructures in 2012 provided a starting point for a series of web seminars on research data projects, open science, and re-use of research data and research software. The Helmholtz Open Science Webinars<strong> (</strong><a href="https://os.helmholtz.de/bewusstsein-schaerfen/workshops/webinare/">https://os.helmholtz.de/bewusstsein-schaerfen/workshops/webinare/</a><strong>) </strong>are directed at scientists, data practitioners, and research software engineers who use the webinars to participate in expert talks via the internet and discuss questions in a live chat. The webinars proved a valuable tool for networking between scientists and staff from Helmholtz Centres and beyond and for sharing best practices when working with research data and research software. To date, around 50 Helmholtz Open Science Webinars have been organised by the Helmholtz Open Science Coordination Office on topics like, for instance, research data publishing, open science tools, and software citation. The webinar series will be continued.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515864
oai:zenodo.org:3515864
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515863
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, 16-17 October 2019
webinar
open science
open access
research data
research software
re-use
networking
Helmholtz Open Science Webinars as a promoting and networking tool
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497365
2020-01-20T17:00:15Z
openaire
user-force2019
Van Gulick, Ana
2019-10-16
<p>Poster presented at FORCE2019 in Edinburgh in October 2019.</p>
<p>The open science movement includes the core pillars of transparency, access, and collaboration as well as the ability to leverage data science technology. The Carnegie Mellon University Libraries strategic plan endeavors to transform the library into the hub of research support for the university. In 2018, the CMU Libraries founded the Libraries Open Science Program to support collaborative, transparent, openly accessible, and reproducible research across all disciplines at Carnegie Mellon University. This program provides services and infrastructure for open research at CMU through digital tools, training opportunities for research tools and practices, special events and advocacy in support of open research, and a team of experts available as research consultants and collaborators. The team includes subject librarians with a research focus, methods specialists in data management and scholarly communication, and post-docs and faculty focused on specific research areas and techniques (e.g. GIS, digital humanities).</p>
https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/9989516.v1
oai:zenodo.org:3497365
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, 15-17 October, 2019
Research support
open science
data sharing
research training
At the intersection of open science and the transforming research library: Carnegie Mellon University Libraries Open Science Program
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497122
2020-01-20T17:21:05Z
openaire
user-force2019
Katz, Daniel S.
Clark, Tim
2019-10-17
<p>In 2014, a set of data citation principles (<a href="https://doi.org/10.25490/a97f-egyk">https://doi.org/10.25490/a97f-egyk</a>) were published, followed in 2016 by a set of software citation principles (<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86</a>). Both were produced by working groups that included researchers, publishers, funders and librarians, and the software citation group loosely followed the same process as the data citation group. Now, both citation communities have moved on from principles to implementation.<br>
<br>
As we examine the progress made by both groups, it becomes clear that some elements of data citation and software citation are similar, such as the need to define appropriate metadata, to work with various groups of stakeholders to understand their specific needs, and to provide guidance and incentives that are customized for these stakeholders. It is also clear that some elements are different - this is partly due to the fundamental differences between software and data, but other factors include the differences in how they are developed, maintained and reused.<br>
<br>
This talk is a collaboration between members of the two working groups. The talk will cover the current state of both areas, the similarities and differences, and how these similarities and differences can impact the communities involved. The talk will also consider possibilities for future progress, both in these areas and in other types of citation.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497122
oai:zenodo.org:3497122
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497121
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, 16-17 October 2019
software citation
data citation
research objects
scholarly communication
Comparing and analyzing the implementation of data citation and software citation
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3530446
2021-12-13T13:44:58Z
openaire
user-force2019
Sheppard, Nick
2019-10-16
<p>There is huge potential for universities and their libraries to leverage Wikimedia in order to expose research outputs and collections. Wikimedia comprises sixteen projects in total, including Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. At the University of Leeds, the Research Data Management Service have successfully run a project that focuses on linking research data with the Wikimedia suite of tools via a series of ‘editathons’, in order to increase the visibility of research data and enable reuse on Wikipedia and elsewhere. The project - "Manage it locally to share it globally: RDM and Wikimedia Commons" - was the winning submission to a competition launched in May 2018 and sponsored by SPARC Europe, Jisc and the University of Cambridge, called the "Data Management Engagement Award", which aimed to address cultural challenges involved in promoting effective research data practices.<br>
<br>
The project has served as a springboard to further explore Wikimedia strategically, both at the University of Leeds and across the White Rose Consortium. For example we are collaborating on a new project looking at Wikipedia citations of research from York, Sheffield and Leeds, and the proportion of these that are open access. The long term goal might be to establish a "Wikimedian in Residence" across the consortium. In this talk, we will present the project's outputs - including a toolkit that will enable other institutions to apply the same methodology. In addition we will explore the potential of Wikidata to link up repositories and other data silos in a manner that enables reuse and increases impact.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3530446
oai:zenodo.org:3530446
eng
Zenodo
https://www.slideshare.net/MrNick/contributing-to-the-global-commons-repositories-and-wikimedia
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3530445
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Wikimedia, Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, repositories. Research Data, RDMEngage, RDM
Contributing to the global commons: Repositories and Wikimedia
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3524093
2020-01-20T17:25:45Z
user-datastewards
openaire
user-force2019
Andrews, Heather
Wang, Yan
2019-10-31
<p>Poster presented at the <strong>FORCE2019 Conference</strong> in Edinburgh, October 16-17, 2019. This poster shows how the role of <strong>Data Stewards</strong> is defined at the Delft University of Technology (TU Delft); how Data Stewards are organized at both, university and faculty levels; and the different initiatives Data Stewards are in charge of, with the aim of <strong>spreading awareness</strong> about Research Data Management and developing a community of <strong>data management aware researchers</strong>.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3524093
oai:zenodo.org:3524093
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://zenodo.org/communities/datastewards
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3524092
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
RDM
TU Delft
FAIR
Software Carpentry
Data Carpentry
Open Science
The role of TU Delft Data Stewards
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3508070
2020-01-20T17:03:02Z
openaire
user-force2019
Proven, Jackie
2019-10-16
<p>Following a restructure in May 2019, the University of St Andrews scholarly communications team moved out of the University Library and became embedded in Research and Innovation Services. For many years, the University Library Digital Research teams (including open access and research data management) have worked very closely with the University's research office to share knowledge, build relationships and provide support to researchers with a joint approach. At a time when most libraries are building their support for open research, it is unusual for the scholarly communications function to sit in a research office. In this talk, we will explore the opportunities presented by this change, such as the ability to communicate open research messages with a strong 'policy' context and being closer to the levers needed to facilitate the required cultural change in researcher behaviour. We will also discuss the challenges in developing the skills needed to support open research, including copyright and licensing expertise, repository maintenance, metadata creation and APC management alongside, rather than within, the library. We aim to present new perspectives on collaboration across departments and how crossing bridges can help drive the open research agenda.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3508070
oai:zenodo.org:3508070
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3508069
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE 2019, Edinburgh, 16-17 October 2019
open research
open scholarship
case study
scholarly communications
research support
Building... then crossing bridges in support of open research
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3497580
2022-05-20T07:31:20Z
openaire
user-force2019
Kramer, Bianca
Bosman, Jeroen
2019-10-17
<p>Panel discussion at <a href="https://www.force11.org/meetings/force2019">FORCE2019</a>, Edinburgh, Scotland - October 17, 2019</p>
<ul>
</ul>
<p><br>
Citations are an important aspect of scholarly infrastructure. Citation databases play an important role in discovery and assessment; however, they currently lack community governance and often have restricted access. Over half of all articles referenced in Crossref now have openly available citations thanks to the I4OC initiative, enabling the citations to be used by anyone for any purpose. For example, OpenCitations have built the open citations index of DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI - <a href="https://opencitations.net/index/coci">https://opencitations.net/index/coci</a>). Yet what about the other half? When publishers themselves cannot be convinced to make citations open, are there other sources that can be used instead? If so, what role do license restrictions play in the availability and reuse of citations from these sources?<br>
<br>
This panel session covers two potential ways of sourcing open citation information and the dilemmas posed by their incompatible license requirements:</p>
<ul>
<li>Crowdsourced Open Citations Index (CROCI - <a href="https://opencitations.net/index/croci">https://opencitations.net/index/croci)</a> - begun by OpenCitations in 2019 as a project in which anyone can deposit citation information, as long as they have the legal right to do so. The information is deposited with a Creative Commons CC0 license in order to enable reuse without limitations.</li>
<li>Microsoft Academic (MA - <a href="https://academic.microsoft.com/home">https://academic.microsoft.com/home</a>) and The Lens (<a href="https://www.lens.org/">https://www.lens.org</a>) can provide a source of citations that are not openly available through Crossref. In both cases, the information is available for sharing and reuse under an Open Data Commons ODC BY license.</li>
</ul>
<p>While citations crowdsourced through CROCI would be fully open for reuse, the approach is limited in scale. Meanwhile, sourcing information from Microsoft Academic or Lens means that more citations can be made publicly available, but also means that the citations cannot be reused without attribution - for example, they cannot be integrated with other open citations in COCI.<br>
<br>
This raises interesting questions, which will also be discussed during this session:</p>
<ul>
<li>What does openness mean for citations?</li>
<li>What are the potential uses cases for open citations?</li>
<li>Which is the best approach when sourcing citations that are currently not openly available?</li>
<li>Can citations really be subject to copyright and/or database licensing, when they are simply statements of fact about relationships between publications?</li>
</ul>
<p>The panel for this session consisted of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Dominika Tkaczyk, Crossref</li>
<li>Ivan Heibi, Open Citations</li>
<li>Shelley Stall, American Geophysical Union</li>
<li>Kathleen Shearer, Coalition of Open Access Repositories</li>
<li>Richard Jefferson, The LENS (via remote connection)</li>
</ul>
<p><br>
The panel was facilitated by:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bianca Kramer, Utrecht University Library</li>
<li>Jeroen Bosman, Utrecht University Library</li>
</ul>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497580
oai:zenodo.org:3497580
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497579
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland, 17-18 October 2019
open citations
scholarly communication
open science
open infrastructure
Citations - how open do we want them?
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3519300
2020-01-20T17:26:18Z
openaire
user-force2019
Mulvany, Ian
2019-10-25
<p>The Coleridge Initiative (<a href="https://coleridgeinitiative.org/">https://coleridgeinitiative.org/</a>) is aiming to make data more usable and available in the social sciences, by connecting research papers to the underlying data and creating infrastructure that provides access to data in computational environments via project Jupyter. This talk will look at one approach taken by the initiative - using a competition (<a href="https://coleridgeinitiative.org/richcontextcompetition">https://coleridgeinitiative.org/richcontextcompetition</a>) in order to encourage teams to help solve one of the core problems, i.e. building machine learning models that identify references to data sets with no standard identifiers.<br>
<br>
Data was supplied for the competition by SAGE publishing and Bundesbank, and funding came from the Sloan Foundation. The competition recieved applications with working software code from twenty teams across the world, with team composition ranging from fully undergraduate through to teams of senior researchers. Submissions were shortlisted and the final six teams were brought together in person, to encourage knowledge sharing and collaboration. All of the outputs were made available under open licences. In this talk, we will briefly discuss the wider project and also analyse the ways in which the competition was a success, as well as ways in which we could make improvements if we were to use this approach again in future.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3519300
oai:zenodo.org:3519300
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3519299
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Force2019, Edinburgh, 15-18 October 2019
social science, rich context, competitions, machine learning
Using open competitions to drive innovation and collaboration.
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3514320
2020-01-20T17:21:19Z
openaire
user-force2019
Alex Wade
2019-10-20
<p>The Meta project at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) is an innovative, intuitive way of empowering scientists to keep up to date with the literature. As with many modern online systems, the app centers around feeds, that in this case are personalized recommendations of scientific papers tailored to individual's research interests. In this presentation, we describe the vision and value proposition of the Meta product, as well as the unique, methodological perspective that differentiates Meta from other services in this field (Semantic Scholar, PubMed, etc). We describe the underlying methods we use to index the entire biomedical literature and support the creation of feeds through curation and data analysis. We also discuss how this contributes to the CZI vision of open science more generally. </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514320
oai:zenodo.org:3514320
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514319
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Meta: Countering the information deluge with content feeds
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3514452
2020-01-20T17:06:45Z
openaire
user-force2019
Surkis, Alisa
2019-10-21
<p>The National Institutes of Health (NIH) BRAIN Initiative (<a href="https://braininitiative.nih.gov/">https://braininitiative.nih.gov/</a>) funds the development and application of innovative technologies to aid in understanding the human brain. In 2017, it introduced funding mechanisms to support:</p>
<ul>
<li>the development of data archives, standards and tools</li>
<li>collaborative research teams studying brain circuit functions' underlying behavior</li>
</ul>
<p>Grants to support the latter required the creation of data science cores, which were tasked with ensuring that the FAIR principles were applied to the data that was collected. NIH created a consortium of the directors of the data science cores for each of the ten grants funded in 2017 and 2018. The purpose of the consortium was to promote collaboration, and the sharing of tools and resources. I am the only librarian among the data science core directors, and I am working - both within my project team and the consortium - to increase the focus on metadata and data discovery.<br>
<br>
Work is currently ongoing in two areas. The first area involves collaboration with a member of one of the project teams, who had developed a metadata collection tool to capture detailed experimental metadata. We are working together to generalize the existing data model in order to support experimental metadata from all participating labs, and to customize the web interface in order to facilitate efficient metadata collection for labs collecting different types of data. The second area involves exploring the use of a data catalog to improve the discovery of BRAIN Initiative data.<br>
<br>
This talk will discuss these projects as well as my experiences in integrating with the project team and working within the data science consortium.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514452
oai:zenodo.org:3514452
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514451
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Collaborations to support data harmonization and discovery in the BRAIN Initiative
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3501625
2020-01-20T13:24:39Z
openaire
user-force2019
user-eu
Gyawali Bikash
Petr Knoth
Nancy Pontika
2019-10-18
<p>These slides were presented at FORCE2019, Edinburgh, Scotland. </p>
<p>This presentation described that while readers can access research literature their university subscribes to quite easily, it is not possible for text and data miners to machine access research literature their university subscribes to effectively and at scale. It supported that accessing content for text and data mining should be as easy as connecting to the eduroam network and suggested to develop a conceptual solution for eduTDM. </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501625
oai:zenodo.org:3501625
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501624
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, 15 - 17 October 2019
big scholarly data
eduTDM
text and data mining
Text and Data Mining Big Scholarly Data
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3514573
2020-01-20T17:04:55Z
openaire
user-force2019
user-eu
Christine Ferguson
Martin Fenner
2019-10-21
<p><strong>Effective scholarly research depends on collecting and linking accurate data about the varied components and outputs. Persistent identifiers (PIDs) such as ORCID IDs, DOIs, or accession numbers offer a solution to pinpoint specific resources and link them. This makes it possible to foster reproducibility eg by ensuring publications contain links to specific reagents and data generated; it means we can gather data about impact of funding, and facility use, and can serve many other use cases in the research community. These user stories are at the heart of the FREYA project, a 3 year EC-funded project that is part of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), where we and others are collaborating to build on the persistent identifier infrastructure, assess emerging identifier types and foster their development and adoption. In this session Martin Fenner (DataCite) and I will introduce the concept of the PID Graph, and some of the emerging persistent identifiers. We will demonstrate how it is possible to connect scholarly entities associated with those new PIDs to other things using the PID Graph, combining practical examples with audience discussion about what is possible with a PID Graph and how to get involved.</strong></p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514573
oai:zenodo.org:3514573
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://zenodo.org/communities/eu
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3514572
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE 2019 conference, Edinburgh, UK, 15-17 October 2019
persistent identifiers
PIDs
Pid Graph
FREYA
The FREYA project: Collaborating to link people, papers, data, to new things…
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3530950
2020-01-20T17:22:55Z
openaire
user-force2019
Jun-ichi Onami
Shigeru Yatsuzuka
Tomoe Nobusada
Hideki Hatanaka
Toshihisa Takagi
2019-10-16
<p>"Life Science Database Cross Search" is a knowledge infrastructure for life science researchers. This service was originally developed in Database Center for Life Science (DBCLS), and was transferred to National Bioscience Database Center (NBDC) in 2011. It provides a web search service across more than 670 public databases (containing 15 million entries). This open infrastructure supports the research data to be "FAIR". For instance, on the point of principle F2 (provided rich meta data) and F3 (indexed in searchable resource), which are difficult to achieve by each data provider or general search engine, our search system can fulfill the terms. Our infrastructure also accelerates the utilization of semantically integrated life science data.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3530950
oai:zenodo.org:3530950
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3530949
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Life science database
FAIR
Japan
For the life science research data to be FAIR on NBDC information infrastructure in Japan
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497306
2023-05-30T22:07:20Z
openaire
user-force2019
user-openscapes
Julia Stewart Lowndes
2019-10-16
<p>Environmental scientists are a diverse community that ranges from climatologists to geneticists, but we are united by an enormous need to work efficiently with data – and by the fact that we seldom have formal computing or data analysis training of any kind. There is great opportunity to borrow from the work of software engineers and use collaborative open tools that facilitate better science in less time. However, a fundamental shift is needed in the environmental science community that prioritizes data science and provides emerging scientific leaders training in open science tools and practices to strengthen and accelerate their work. I will discuss my work to catalyze this shift at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Building from our <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-017-0160">open data science work with the Ocean Health Index</a>, I will discuss a program have recently launched in January 2019 as a Mozilla Fellow: <a href="https://openscapes.org">Openscapes</a>, a mentorship program that empowers environmental scientists with open data science tools and grows the community of practice.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497306
oai:zenodo.org:3497306
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://zenodo.org/communities/openscapes
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497305
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
open science, open data science, environment, mozilla
Building communities of practice around environmental open data science
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3524461
2020-01-20T16:45:27Z
openaire
user-force2019
Chatterji, Promita
Dublin, Yvonne
Griffin, Kevin
2019-10-31
<p>Institution-led publishing today can take many forms. As sophisticated technologies become more user-friendly, an increasing number of digital publishing platforms are emerging. Librarians and academics are often the new vanguard in this evolving landscape. During this session, each of the panelists will present their current activities and explain how they are collaborating in order to further the cause of university-led and academic led-publishing. </p>
<p>Yvonne Desmond, a library administrator, will describe how her library is managing an entire open access publishing program the covers a range of disciplines. She will talk about publishing strategy, managing contributors and stakeholders, and communicating successes and milestones. Kevin Griffin, an academic at the same institution, will describe how he publishes his own peer-reviewed journal-managing submissions, handling peer review, assigning content to issues, tracking readership and reporting to stakeholders. He will provide an overview of how he launched the journal and how he has made inroads within his discipline. Promita Chatterji, a technologist, will suggest what traits make for a flexible, secure, usable, and scalable publishing platform, as well as how the most successful platforms seamlessly integrate with institutional repositories. </p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3524461
oai:zenodo.org:3524461
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3524460
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Open access, library-led publishing,
Publishing in the Hands of Librarians and Academics - Three Perspectives
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3516211
2020-01-20T16:55:30Z
openaire
user-force2019
Morris, Elisha
2019-10-04
<p>Poster about why researchers should embrace Registered Reports, based on a survey of authors, editors and reviewers of registered reports.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3516211
oai:zenodo.org:3516211
Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/ndvek
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3516210
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
FORCE2019, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 16-17 October 2019
Registered Reports
FORCE2019
Open Research
Why Researchers Should Embrace Registered Reports
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster
oai:zenodo.org:3497352
2020-01-20T15:07:56Z
openaire
user-force2019
Bailey, Jefferson
Newbold, Bryan
2019-10-16
<p>In 2018, the Internet Archive undertook a large-scale project to build as complete a collection as possible of scholarly outputs published on the web, as well as to improve the discoverability and accessibility of scholarly works archived as part of these global web harvests. This project involved a number of areas of work: targeted archiving of known OA publications (especially at-risk “long tail” publications); extraction and augmentation of bibliographic metadata and full text; integration and preservation of related identifier, registry, and aggregation services and datastores; partnerships with affiliated initiatives and joint service developments; and creation of new tools and machine learning approaches for identifying archived scholarly work in existing born-digital and web collections. The project also identified and archived associated research outputs such as blogs, datasets, code repositories and other secondary research objects. The beta API and public interface - code-named "fatcat" - can be found at <a href="https://fatcat.wiki/">https://fatcat.wiki/</a>.<br>
<br>
Project leads will talk about the project’s current status and upcoming work, focusing on content acquisition, indexing, discoverability, the role of machine learning, service provisioning, and their collaborative work with libraries, publishers, and non-profits. Conceptually, the project demonstrates that the scalability and technologies of "archiving the web" can facilitate automated ingest, enrichment, and dissemination strategies for a variety of web-published primary and secondary scholarly record types that have traditionally been collected via more custom and manual workflows. The project strategic goal is to provide open infrastructure for the perpetual discoverability of and access to archived scholarship.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497352
oai:zenodo.org:3497352
eng
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497351
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
digital libraries
open access
scholarly communication
Perpetual Access Machines: Archiving Web-Published Scholarship at Scale
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture
oai:zenodo.org:3497422
2020-01-20T17:15:35Z
openaire
user-force2019
Arfon Smith
2019-10-17
<p>This is a presentation I gave at FORCE2019 (<a href="https://www.force11.org/meetings/force2019">https://www.force11.org/meetings/force2019</a>) about the Journal of Open Source Software.</p>
<p>In this presentation I try and explain how JOSS works, and how we're leveraging open source conventions to build a low cost, open access journal.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497422
oai:zenodo.org:3497422
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/force2019
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3497421
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Journal of Open Source Software: When collaborative open source meets peer review
info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture