Guide for funders to support FAIR workflows & enable research tracking
- 1. DataCite
- 2. Crossref
- 3. ORCID
Contributors
- 1. Crossref
- 2. Max Planck Institute for
- 3. DataCite
- 4. Australian Research Data Commons
Description
This document is presented to the community as a basis for discussion and input from September 1 to October 15, 2023. The authors will revise, and update the funder guide based on the community feedback.
Please share your thoughts about the role of funders in supporting Open and FAIR research with us by directly commenting on this open Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BLUom2BvO_v2H7fH3HKOB4KAQVqc5_woGeXDmljIBzI/edit?usp=sharing
Abstract
The Implementing FAIR Workflows project is a 3-year project to implement exemplar FAIR workflows in cognitive neuroscience research, based on the existing persistent identifier (PID) and metadata infrastructure. The project team at DataCite collaborated with Crossref and ORCID to develop this Guide for Funders, harmonizing information available across the open scholarly infrastructure organizations into a set of recommendations. The guide aims to introduce the role of persistent identifiers and metadata in facilitating open and FAIR research and walk the reader through ways to actively engage in implementing PIDs and metadata workflows, by committing resources, enacting congruent policies and guidelines, and providing support around grant application, management, and reporting. These workflows will provide a concrete basis for FAIR practices and output tracking, benefiting both funders and the broader research community.
Notes
Files
Guide for funders to support FAIR Workflows.pdf
Files
(386.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5aebd0c91d4c9f16141e71fb23c26ad3
|
386.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is required by
- Other: 10.54224/20568 (DOI)
- References
- Project deliverable: 10.5281/zenodo.7382642 (DOI)
References
- Brown, Josh, Jones, Phill, Meadows, Alice, & Murphy, Fiona. (2022). Incentives to invest in identifiers: A cost-benefit analysis of persistent identifiers in Australian research systems. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7100578
- Xiaoli Chen, Helena Cousijn, & Kelly Stathis. (2022). Implementing FAIR Workflows D1.1 Workflows Specification. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7382642
- Brown, Josh, Jones, Phill, Meadows, Alice, & Murphy, Fiona. (2022, September 16). PID-optimised workflows: A vision of a more efficient future. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7085489
- Wilkinson, M. D., et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Shillum, C. Sadler, S. Petro, J. (2023). ORCID Poised to Support Research Institutions in New Era of Public Access and Research Security [Website]. ORCID. Retrieved 21 July 2023, from https://info.orcid.org/orcid-poised-to-support-research-institutions-in-new-era-of-public-access-and-research-security/
- Sadler, S. (2022) ORCID: Keeping Up with FAIR Momentum [Website]. ORCID. Retrieved 21 July 2023, from https://info.orcid.org/orcid-fair-data-principles/
- Pentz, E., Hendricks, G. (2022). How funding agencies can meet OSTP (and Open Science) guidance using existing open infrastructure [Website]. Crossref. Retrieved 6 January 2023, from https://www.crossref.org/blog/how-funding-agencies-can-meet-ostp-and-open-science-guidance-using-existing-open-infrastructure/
- Anger, M., Wendelborn, C., Winkler, E. C., & Schickhardt, C. (2022). Neither carrots nor sticks? Challenges surrounding data sharing from the perspective of research funding agencies—A qualitative expert interview study. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0273259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273259
- Kathryn A. Kaiser, Michelle Urberg, Maria Johnsson, Jennifer Kemp, Alice Meadows, Laura Paglione. (2021). An international, multistakeholder survey about metadata awareness, knowledge, and use in scholarly communications. Quantitative Science Studies; 2 (2): 454–473.: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00133
- Copyright Clearance Center & Media Growth Strategies. (2023). State of Scholarly Metadata Study. Copyright Clearance Center. https://www.copyright.com/stateofmetadata/
- Curry, Stephen, de Rijcke, Sarah, Hatch, Anna, Pillay, Dorsamy (Gansen), van der Weijden, Inge, & Wilsdon, James. (2022). The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: Progress, obstacles and the way ahead (RoRI Working Paper No.3) (p. 2449096 Bytes). Research on Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.13227914
- Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
- Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
- Research Consulting. (2022). Review of funder data policies—Summary of findings.