on
it.
It's another unique thing for us.
So the first steps of this program that started 1 year ago
We have been working on a re-sensing of the tools available to technicians who exist,
on diagnostics, in particular.
We have been working on the implementation of methods and different tools
that are both used in environmental and agricultural environments.
We are now trying to mutualize these tools to have a common discussion with the elders.
The initial phase of the project is to gather information with the elders,
gather pastoral practices, gather expectations.
For this, we need to have a diagnostic tool for these operations
that is as close to the objectives as possible.
We have remodeled all the methods that exist to reform one.
It is not a new method, it is a compilation of existing tools
that allow today to start the project with the elders.
For us, technicians, it is obvious that it is a tool, the life,
to make us evolve in our ways of working.
Just to get out of this logic that sometimes has to separate the ecological aspects and the agricultural aspects,
to put them back together and to have a discussion with the farmers.
We really take it as an opportunity to form all these techniques.
It is an opportunity to grow our skills.
It is also an opportunity for us to go to the park's elders' meeting,
a new opportunity to make more knowledge with them,
to really go to the bottom of the subject,
because it is true that life allows us, it gives us the means, it is means.
To really go to the bottom of the ecological and ecological questions with the elders.
Following a discussion and a plan made by the Milouv organism
on the management of the peaches,
we managed to define a 15 hectare plot,
where we thought that we had to do some refines in it
to be able to value the air inside,
because in some places it will be completely closed.
How to succeed?
In some places it will be completely closed,
so it is completely underpainted.
In other places, vegetation begins to be rare,
because the peaches go too far.
It is overpainted.
So how to succeed?
How to manage that?
To be able to have autonomy at the level of exploitation.
We are really looking for a food autonomy.
As we discussed at the Kralab,
they made different photos with precise angles
to have follow-ups from year to year
to know how it evolved,
to see the new species that appear or disappear,
why and at what period they will have to bring the peaches or not.
So if we bring the peaches on these routes,
there will be very little value,
from the past hectare days.
And if we manage to solve them in advance,
we will really have a very good resource,
so it helps us to buy a farm truck.
So after the optics and to say to ourselves,
it is better to put 1,000 euros in the enclosure
than 1,000 euros in a farm truck.
It is an investment to have,
with a minimum maintenance,
for 10 years we have a reliable enclosure
and the time when the peaches are outside
is not in the enclosure to be fed with food.
This is what will be interesting with Milou,
also to have a follow-up on it,
to know how to do,
at what period,
which route to put the peaches,
in relation to such a variety of plants,
if we want to manage to reduce it or increase it,
we have to bring the peaches rather in this period.
This period is quite interesting.
I discovered the Milouv project,
a contact rendering with the National part of the Cévennes,
that is Mr. Bastille,
the monitor that is on the sector,
with whom I had other questions asked,
especially in relation to the evolution
of my exploitation towards the bio.
This is where Stéphane Bati
proposed to me to enter the Milouv project.
My research on the improvement
of the exploitation of my exploitation
by systems that are less expensive,
less expensive,
and above all, take into account
the ecology,
which is a point that seems important to me
on my exploitation.
I am really looking for something
that allows me to reduce the charges
and also to gain on the ecological principle.
It is certain that the presence of the National part of the Cévennes
on the intersector
is a plus for this evolution
in a world where we are looking for
a little more clean, a little more respectful.
I hope that in the future,
it will spread and deepen
with these exchanges that have been made
by the Milouv Intermediary.
I have seen the knowledge of the project
by the biologist Sébastien Girardin.
The little we have talked about,
it seemed interesting to me.
We are often in the head of the guide
and we do not necessarily take
or we do not take the time
to take a little back on what we have done
and therefore I have the impression
that I am aware that we have made mistakes
by ignorance.
It is good to have an external look
of a technician or of our approach
on our exploitation
to help us drive it.
It is a permanent concern
for the well-being of the troupe
and for the preservation of our environment
because we do not feed
exclusively on the outside.
We cannot afford to damage the garrick.
We are obliged to preserve it
and try to optimize it.
It is innovative in relation to,
for example, what has been done
20-30 years ago where we said
there must be great routes
of 50 hectares where we will put the rubies in.
The goal was to make
4 to 5 hectares of land
and with a rotation every 5 days.
The system is operational
and I realize that
it is already a month and a half
that the rubies are on these plots
and that the grass is also regenerating
as a result of which there is a real resource
that is valued with a biodiversity
that is evolving.
And there is a place that opens up
on the granaries, etc.
We see the impact on the rubies,
the trees that are growing,
the vegetation that is growing.
I do not think it is to this point.
The trunk is dry
and there is not a lot of dust
and then, of course, it collapses on top.
It is very interesting, I think.
What I realized is that
on a 15 hectare tree
that looks quite homogeneous,
it is more than 10 cm,
there may be a little resource in the grass
and when we are going to put the rubies
for a week with a fairly important pressure,
we really see the gap between the other
and the other side.
And there, we say to ourselves,
it is true that there is a real resource
where we do not realize
that the rubies will just make trees
like that.
We do not realize that if we really leave them
in a place,
well, yes,
the vegetation descends
and, on the other hand,
it means that it really has to be eaten.
And that,
I was not aware of it.
The Milouv Dianastique
has been well perceived.
In addition,
we had a very, very good relationship
with the people who came
to make this Dianastique.
A common walk
and with a lot of discussion,
it was very pleasant for me
and I have the impression that
people who came on site, too.
The good deeds of Milouv,
it is above all,
I believe,
a professional reason,
but I believe that today
agriculture is part of the sectors
where people will close
more and more on themselves.
And I believe that Milouv
is something that has allowed us
to recreate some encounters,
to find some people,
to work together.
We found each other
two or three times at home
with several farmers,
to take lunch together,
to go for a walk in the mountains,
to see the trails.
It was a great discussion,
and I think that it is part of
the important thing
to put forward.
We did a diagnosis
with technicians
to draw a lot of
road management.
For example,
there is a field,
an old vineyard
that was torn down
25 years ago,
not far from the
prairie,
and it is true that
unconsciously,
we do not necessarily take into account
and in fact,
it is a prairie
that is being regenerated,
being reconstructed,
and we might have
a tendency to make
a little too much impact
unconsciously
by going in the evening
through this prairie.
From the beginning,
we started in a different way.
They know that we launch the movement.
From there,
they will evolve like that.
It is good to have
a professional look outside
that comes, targets
such or such a thing
that is completely happening to us.
By seeing that every day,
we no longer see it.
Here,
the green fields here,
the prairie,
I no longer see the green fields.
For me,
I pay more attention,
it is my environment.
Where it comforts us in our practices,
it allows us to reactivate
mistakes,
like everyone,
human mistakes,
we do everything to
work best.
It was decided to trust us
in this project,
the training of agricultural and
environmental practices,
because, on the one hand,
we already do it
because we have contracts
with them
on other programs.
But in addition,
we jumped on the opportunity
with these stages
to mix the public.
In the same way
that we do multi-cultural
in the Milouv program
between agriculture
and the environment,
we pushed further.
We also did
mix and culture
between the teaching environment
and the technicians
who are agricultural or environmental.
For us, this approach
was very important.
That is why
we preferred to
ensure from time to time
the training mission
of everyone in fact.
After a day of
discovery of
cancer diagnoses,
we immediately leave
and go to farmers
in small groups.
And we immediately
work with people
in real conditions
on diagnoses
which makes it easier
for them to appropriate themselves.
And at the same time,
they have a training like that
on the field,
in the various vegetable fields
and in the open environment
that we want to make them
discover or deepen.
The returns are very positive.
There are several things
that are very appreciated
in these stages.
First of all,
the fact that it is on the field
and that it is very practical,
an alternation
in the living room
and outside,
that is very, very well perceived.
And the mix
between agriculture and environment
is also very, very appreciated.
By having been able to exchange
the whole week
with people who do the same thing
or with people who are
of the other movement,
agriculture and environment,
well, it gives them
bills to move on
the projects
they are responsible for
in their job.
The goal was to
make people out
of agriculture
their knowledge
a bit agronomic,
zootechnical
and to go more
to the meeting
of the representation
of farmers
and to have more dialogue
with them
on how farmers
see the open environment
to favor the dialogue
between the two.
So we have already seen
during the visits
on the field
during the stages.
In fact, it's a little bit,
we are a little bit
in this program
on the translation
of the agronomic
and environmental
language
or environmental language
in agronomic language
and people
it's still a little bit
if they learn a foreign language
and who can use it afterwards
so that everyone
can communicate better
together.
It was also our objective.
And we see it well
during the training
that there are already
the two environments that are mixed
that interest me
to have both
more agricultural
and environmental environment
and suddenly
we find areas
that are much faster
so we advance more quickly
and the second big advantage
is that for the farmer
we will also have
the double
at least the double language
which in the end
make us more than one
and suddenly
we are much more relevant
and I think that in the end
we are much more effective
than the
rather classic approaches
where everyone works
in his corner.
We try together
to preserve the environment
at the same time
because it's a rich environment
but also because
for you
for your exploitation
and your way of working
it can be an advantage
and that I think
is a little bit new
as a approach.
On the middle education
the mix
of the public works well
in the sense
where the teachers
enrich themselves
in fact
on the concrete side
which is
which is brought
by the technicians
who are on the field
every day
and which brings a little bit
the concrete side of the field
so it's actually
a kind of training
for the teachers
and enriching
of all this technical side
in fact
it allows the teachers
to better grasp
the context on the field
to appropriate it
and to be able to think
to teach
and to transmit
the Milouv method
in a way
the best link
to the field
in fact
as concrete as possible.
So we meet
with a note
of three
in productivity
it's not that bad
in the end.
So to appropriate
the Milouv program
there are several ways
for the teachers
first of all
they can come here
in training
so training
that is connected
with the
technicians
in a large environment
and suddenly
in training
we try to work
since there are two types
of public
to advise the teachers
so
from time to time
we separate groups
and we take the teachers
a little more apart
to see
how they
a face
to transmit the Milouv method
which is still quite complex
the diagnostics
are quite long
to put in place
and see how they
can transmit it
to students
in relation
with the
pedagogical objectives
of the year
of the referential
and
and also
in relation
with the
the time lapses
they have for that
the availability
of students
teachers
I also remind you
that the Milouv diagnosis
is also done
to entail
and
to commit a work
with the elevator
so that
precisely
he
uses well
his pastoral surfaces
and
finally
uses them better
values them better
while responding
to the need of his troops
it's still
I had already used
the pastoralism
a little bit like
a subject
precisely
of these relationships
agriculture
ecology
environment
and
I needed
to train
on it
to acquire
more and more knowledge
That's it
until after that
it goes down again
It's very different
In fact
we worked here
with some teachers
on
an adaptation
of the Milouv method
so that
it can
transmit to students
and then
we try to make
sure that
the Milouv program
in the school
the farms
of agricultural exploitation
so for us
the ideal is
when teachers
can work
with a group of students
on
plots
of
Ulysses exploitation
so in this case
they only work
on plots
but in relation
with the
agricultural exploitation director
because there is
a whole part
before going on the field
before going on the plots
properly talked about
where
students
dialogue
with
the
agricultural exploitation director
on the production system
the historical
etc
so here
it also
the personnel
of the agricultural exploitation
and also
the sensitivity
to this idea
of reopening
of the fields
we also worked
with
students
from the
Merle
school
in Provence
and here
it was
another adaptation
it's a training
for
the students
who are very short
who last
almost a school year
who is very oriented
on the practical side
and not too much
on the theoretical side
and there is no
teaching
really
pastoral management
so it was a kind of
experience
by the
Milouv program
to adapt it
so that the Berger students
can grasp
the notion of diagnosis
and apply it
it's true that my
goal here
was to
appropriate the tool
to
just vulgarize
at the level
of the training
of Berger
I think that
already
if I can
use the tool
to characterize the
environment
on which
the Bergers
will evolve
and then
eventually
give them
keys
so that they can
do
diagnostics
but perhaps
not so deeply
but already
what
environment
they develop
what can be
pastoral
use
and especially
eventually
follow the
predictions
that will be
made
that will
be
achieved
that the objective
will be achieved
all the small plans
that's like in Kroo
we find
about the same
yes
if it's
overdone
or
or the opposite
or the opposite
I think it is important
to inform
the elected
and administrative agents
on the Milouv program
because
each one has
an important role
to play
a key role
for the maintenance
and opening
of the environment
I think that
the elected
are
planning documents
they are aware
that they can
favor
the areas
or other
the agricultural land
and the routes
some have done
they have
routes
in pastoral areas
for example
and then
administrative agents
because they are
in contact
with the managers
who are present
on the territory
including farmers
regarding the criteria
there is
the auto-pastoralism
or what we call
the auto-pastoralism
that is
to evaluate
the resource
that is brought
by the route
that is
almost 80%
of the food resource
was on the route
the resource is big
so
we are really
on the pastoral systems
and knowing that
the remaining
of the big
comes from
ecological foreign
play
I got
knowledge
of the Milouv project
because
it is part
of a program
funded by the intent
and on which
we hope
to bounce
the interest
since the 1980s
in the Department of Heroes
and on this site
in particular
to know
the maintenance
of open space
by an agricultural function
and by an agricultural function
in relation to
a pure diversity approach
that we could have
we cannot be content
to say
on this park
it is in the middle
of Brussels
it is not good
you have to put the burbis
at such a time
I came
to information
with the elected
and administrative agents
to present them
what is good
when it comes to these veins
it is finally
to understand
that they have
open spaces
which have
a real value
what is called
a universal
exceptional value
so
they discover
that these landscapes
have a real value
a patrimonial value
and an environmental value
and that
it interprets them
at the end of the training
with all the
intervening
that there is
they discover that
landscapes
can also have
an economic value
and can
favor
the maintenance of the exploitation
because
if they do less
call for training
which values
the maximum
the natural resources
economically
it comes out better
so
the landscape
also becomes
a subjunctive
and an economic value
and a more
economic value
for the exploitation
and for the economy
of the territory
the project I open
I discovered
during the invitation
of this training
I discovered
all the rest
of the problem
of raising
and the maintenance
of open lands
and
it also interests me
as we have
a huge
pastoral potential
on the commune
which unfortunately
is getting lost
little by little
because we have
a trance
essentially
trance troops
and
I find that
a shame
and because I am
convinced that
there is something
to make a permanent
raise
which could
re-dynamize
the commune
in the interest
of this approach
what we can see
is this territory
that still
presents
on the
departmental flight
another activity
in the face of the
great public
but also on the
historical and cultural aspect
and for us
the preservation
of these areas
brought back
a patrimonial interest
and a general interest
and it is in this sense
that the departmental
collectivity
wants to go
towards operations
of this type
to precisely
perennize
the problematical
of our departments
the maintenance
of our spaces
is guaranteed
by the agro-pastoral activities
so
to sensibilize
the elected
of course
but also
the farmers
on the
issues
of these practices
it is fundamental
especially
for us
what concerns
the maintenance
of biodiversity
in our territories
if
these extensive
missing
animals
to take care of
in the end
the forest
will regain
after two or three generations
and we will have
an important loss
in terms of quality
of landscape
and also in terms of
biodiversity of course
