ये रारंदाये आदरारंदाये ये या
ये रारंदाये आदरारंदाये ये रो
ये रारंदाये आदरारंदाये ये या
ये रारंदाये आदरारंदाये ये रो
ता ला नुस कंपुस जिकना
ता ला नुस गेटुस वंगेस
ता ला को आब आब आब आब आब आब
आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये
आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये
आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये आदरारंदाये
और यह जिनास ब effective & healthy शबच्यास्विस्या तुर्ट मुल्ँइ्श्यान के।
ये आज़े थी आज़े गराजे भी बजागा आज़े ल्गाजागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागागा�
पुर्से तमें मेकनिस्म, जूरीटिक बास्टन्टी कुम्प्लेट।
जूरीटिक बास्टन्टी कुम्प्लेटिक बास्टन्टी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्प्लेटी कुम्�
...gr Indians
या लिएक्या उआश्खिटाएशिकाड कुम्प्लेटि कंफ़ुःटिच्मटाएशिकाचुसट्विएकिulle
� Agreement
...
लोईईषा नाजि Musha
of women, indulge in various forms of prejudice
and which do not allow the women to access the right
Something that is there, guaranteed in the law
So, for example, it is still very common
and that the women is blamed for the violence she suffers
She was attacked by her husband, a partner
But many times it is thought that this woman provoked aggression
Other times, it happens that they try to minimize
the suffering of this woman.
So, because of the aggression,
many times we have cases of
attempted homicide,
which is framed in a light body lesion,
for example, which is just too small.
So, there is still
even with the law of opinion,
in the head of the people,
the violence against women,
of some people, of course not all,
but the violence against women is a trivial thing
and that may not be punished.
It is still very strong
this idea that is more important,
the family is reconciling
and the woman is returning home
and suffering again the violence
because all of us know
what happens,
what exactly gives a journey
for women to be protected.
So, in the scope of the judiciary power
these are the biggest difficulties
that we face.
Even recently, the STJ
decided that
it can apply the suspension of the process
in the case of the law of opinion,
in the case of the STJ
which is a great process
that we expect to be reversed
because it brings great harm
to a fight that comes
as I said, in the last two decades.
In the scope of the executive power
the biggest difficulty
that we have yet
is the prioritization
of the confrontation
of violence against women
because it is only done with resources.
We need resources
to implement the necessary services.
So, I think this
movement of women
still sees this
as one of the biggest difficulties.
We need resources,
we need services, not just any service
we need quality services.
So, our dialogue
with the executive power
is going in this sense.
We also have great challenges
we face great challenges
in the legislative power
because the law of opinion
is a law that is known
by the majority of Brazilians
and Brazilians
has a very high popularity
received the support of more than 80%
of the population
and this confirms the law
with a great visibility
any case, many cases
involving the law
or change proposal
comes to the media very quickly
and this has incentivized
many
and many parliamentarians
to present in the bill
that changes the law of opinion
and currently,
the CFA has 23 bill
that proposes changes
to the law of opinion
and in our assessment
none of these projects
brings positive,
concrete changes
favorable to women
in fact,
most of them do not change
the functioning that we already have
and some,
some even worse
this law that is considered
by one of the three best legislations
of the world
to face violence against women
so, our work
has been in the sense
to take this project of law
to dialogue with parliamentarians
about this
the importance of a period
for the law to strengthen
before, imagine, if the law
goes through 23 changes
it is already so questioned
in the judiciary power
this amount of changes
would actually only bring
a great insecurity
in the application of the law
much more than any benefit
for women in the end of last year
we follow the implementation
of two bill projects
approved
one of them was approved
in a special commission
in the social security commission
in the chamber of deputies
one of these projects
establishes that
the law of opinion can be applied
to couples
because once again, as I said
does not change the functioning of the law
why? what does the law of opinion say?
the law of opinion
applies to cases of violence
this happens in domestic
in family
or in third place
in intimate relations
so there is no need
to define
what these intimate relations are
can be love
can be efficient
can be several things that we always develop
new names to speak
for example, color friendship, the law
already predicts all this
so there is no real need
there has been a dialogue
that we have made with
the deputy Mr. Babali
who is the author of the second project
brings a little more technical change
but still
we also value
that there is no real need
what happens?
the second project wants
to create a mechanism
so that the aggressor is processed
independently
of the punishment of the victim
that is to say
the victim goes to the hospital
reports the violence she suffered
and from there
the aggressor can already be processed
if there are evidence
the aggressor can be processed
the victim cannot remove the complaint
as it happened before
the law of opinion
it happens that this is our initial understanding
of the law
the law of opinion was created with
one of the objectives was exactly this
for the victim
this big weight
which is to decide
if she continues or not with the process
because many times she came back to the house
and the aggressor
took away the aggressions
so this is already foreseen
in the law
it has not worked
because the judiciary power still resists
so to finalize
about this legislative theme
we fear that
as well as the law was produced
of a collective effort
an intense dialogue with society
the participation of several movements
of women, feminist movements
we understand that any change
in the law has to be structured
from this dialogue
very plural, very open with society
not of isolated initiatives
of parliamentarians
what we need
of parliamentarians and of parliamentarians
is that they
continue to do
together, join together
in these efforts
to demand that the law be implemented
and to show its importance
to all society
so, this is our final decision
and we will continue to do
this
and we will continue to do
this
and we will continue to do
this
and we will continue to do
this importance to all society
from far away
so, this is our final decision
