Today, the global food supply could feed nearly 12 billion people, nearly twice the current
world population. 80% of this global food supply is produced by family farming, and
this type of agriculture employs over 40% of the global working population. As a matter
of fact, the General Assembly of the United Nations declared 2014 as the International
Year of Family Farming. So this family farming which feeds most of us today, what does it
look like?
Over the course of a year, to answer this question, a group of young agronomists decided
to utilise their end of year internships to meet farmers around the world. They travelled
to India, France, Ecuador, Cameroon and Canada. Through this film, they invite us to discover
the diversity of family farming, what it is and what it is not, and under which conditions
family farmers can meet the challenges of tomorrow.
India is a mosaic of cultures, histories and environments. The rains and winds that
sweep the country are crucial for agriculture. After the monsoon season in the western part
of the country, farmers from the state of Kujarat work a semi-arid landscape.
In Jhantai Paludra, Aide incident brings us toalam k Fahrenheit.
In Jhantai Paludra, the admiral of Jhantai Jhantai Stibaleri names the first life
By diversifying its production, this farm manages to satisfy all the nutritional needs
of the family on a small piece of land.
But these farmers also show us that family farming is not exclusively geared towards
self-sufficiency, as some of their products are sold.
Their vegetables can be found on local markets, their milk is sold all over India, and their
mangos are exported to Europe.
However, family farming does not always look like this.
They are sold up to $60- Through factories.
There is also no corn chai that can take it and when they consume corn, all that is
gone.
It is partially reaches the property.
Specializing in milk production, this farm shows that family farms are not always diversified.
Both of these farms produce milk that is delivered every day to the world's largest
federation of cooperatives, Amal.
The federation has increased the income of many farmers by providing them with access
to a stable and lucrative market.
Started by the Amal cooperative model, these changes in the dairy industry, called the
White Revolution, later received state support.
The government recognized the benefit of encouraging rural development while increasing
Indian dairy production, and therefore also its contribution to the food security of the
country.
By supporting infrastructure for milk collection services, this policy allowed many farmers
to improve their living conditions, while delivering affordable milk to urban areas.
Vasudhara is created to provide the livelihood to the milk producers.
The interest is that we are providing all the backward linkage, like loan to purchase
the animals, then cattle feed and other feed supplements.
We are also providing animal husbandry and veterinary services, and after all, our most
critical work is to provide training to the milk producers, then provide all the input
facilities needed for milk production.
One of the main goals of this policy was to encourage as many households as possible,
even the poorest ones, to buy animals.
The original slogan of the Amal Federation stated this explicitly.
Today, over 3 million farmers make a decent daily income from the milk they sell, thanks
to Amal.
But what is more astonishing is that the majority of farmers from this cooperative have less
than five bovines.
By giving them access to a stable market, to both technical and financial support, the
Federation contributes to generating revenue, thus improving many farmers' living conditions.
Today, the Amal Federation of Cooperatives collects over 7 million litres of milk per day.
By supporting these family farming forms and these small farms, one of them has become
the first milk producer in the world.
She has managed to satisfy the national demand in dairy products, thus contributing to ensure
the food security of the country, but above all to make many families of farmers live,
so that they don't need to join the farmers of Mombay or New Delhi.
However, the end of poverty is still a current problem in India, which is why it is important
to have projects that take into account the access to different means of production,
whether it is land, water or credit and farming.
But family farming is not only a type of agriculture that exists in so-called developing
countries, producing on small land allotments, with small herds of cattle and a few hand
tools.
Family farming is also widely found in so-called developed countries.
In France, before the Second World War, a large part of the agricultural production
came from small family farms, producing a diversity of crops.
This type of production has evolved after the long period of conflict.
Various public policies, including the common agricultural policy of the European Union,
have enabled access to high-yielding seeds, fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides, as
well as mechanisation thanks to beneficial loans.
In France, agricultural organisations and cooperatives were also developed to represent
the agricultural profession to the public authorities. Through stabilised market prices,
they also helped to facilitate the commercialisation of agricultural products.
In order to remain competitive and produce low-cost food, farmers have often needed to
expand and specialise their farming practices to maintain a decent income.
This family pig farm in Brittany is a clear example of this process.
My father and my grandfather settled here in Trumé, where we are now.
He bought this farm in 52 or 3 years.
It had 12 cows, 4 or 5 trees.
So we lived until the 70s, roughly like that.
And then my brother began to orient himself towards agricultural production.
In the 60s, we had to produce agricultural products.
In France, we had to produce everything to feed ourselves.
We worked very well, at the same level as we did in the 80s, after the incitements.
Similarly, as was seen during the White Revolution in India, French family farms managed to
meet and even surpass the national food needs, therefore turning France into a major exporter.
It's a revolution between the 60s and the 2000s, between the 20s and the 40s.
We have a high-quality agricultural exploitation.
We have 120 hectares of land, we have a 408-year-old farm.
Specialization and expansion of agricultural systems can also be problematic, not only
to farmers, but also to society as a whole.
We produce about 800 tons of cereals and we need 3,000 for the cows.
So we only have one third.
The cereals that we produce are probably produced by livestock, protein, from Brazil or from the United States.
To meet the daily needs of animals, imported soybean cakes are currently the most profitable
source of protein for farmers.
This low-cost feed allows farmers to carry on producing cheap meat, thus satisfying consumer demand.
The future of the daughter will always be of high quality production.
With the cost of producing a kilo of meat as cheap as possible, consumers will always be
able to pay too much.
Family farming does sometimes have a negative impact on the environment.
Indeed, minerals accumulated in soybeans from the United States, Brazil and Argentina
eventually end up spread throughout the land in Brittany via animal manure.
These excessive minerals can cause problems such as the development of green algae.
Nevertheless, farmers continue to evolve their practices in an attempt to respond to environmental
challenges such as reducing their energy consumption.
By reusing the heat produced by the animals to heat the air coming from outside, the farmer
manages to make significant energy savings.
In order to keep up with public health challenges, farmers are also innovative in livestock
management practices.
What we need to remember is that family farmers are quite capable of adapting to the changing
times of society so long as we support them and pay them properly.
Over the course of history, some farmers have been able to invest and modernise their farms.
However, others who were not able to stay as competitive were eventually forced to sell
their land, generally to larger neighbouring farmers.
Today's requirement for large and significant operating investments represents a real obstacle
for farmers wanting to establish themselves and for families trying to pass the farm on
to the next generation.
Purchasing new farm lands to settle has become very difficult.
Many projects have been created to assist the settlement process and improve access to
lands for the new generation of family farmers.
For example, farm incubators are strategies that assist young farmers.
Family farming is not just composed of farms that are transferred within the same family.
France, like most developed countries, has supported a network of family farms with production
directed mostly towards the domestic market.
However, this is not the case in many other countries.
Located in central Africa, Cameroon has a diversity of ecosystems, promoting a wide
variety of crops, including coffee and cocoa.
Historically, these two crops were introduced by Europeans and were originally grown in
order to meet the needs of colonial homelands.
After independence in 1960 and with the support of the Cameroonian government, numerous family
farmers started to specialize in the production of these export crops.
However, specialization in agricultural products cultivated solely for export can be risky for
farmers as their income is dependent on fluctuating global market prices.
This risk became a reality in the 1990s when an increase in the world production of coffee
and cocoa led to a sharp drop in the price of these commodities.
Many vulnerable farming families relying on these crops faced great difficulties.
Facing this crisis in coffee and cocoa prices, many farmers decided to diversify their production
and focus more on producing crops destined to be sold in local markets.
I started doing gardening even though I planted coffee, but the coffee business was a very
difficult one.
Even though originally intended for the local market, vegetable production gradually entered
the African regional market.
I always sell just the local market at Santa to buy and sell.
By choosing to grow more crops that are directly consumable and can be sold on the local market,
farmers are less vulnerable to the risks associated with being dependent on an unstable global market.
So now I go back to the food crop so that even if they don't buy it, I can eat some.
I wouldn't starve, I wouldn't starve.
I would hardly starve except they cut my hands, except the soil is not there.
If the soil is there and I have the energy to work, I will always have food.
In Cameroonian society, while men tend to generate income via cash crops or through off-farm
activities, the women of the family commonly produce crops for home consumption.
These women have acquired detailed knowledge about their environment and land, which enables
them to create very complex diverse crop associations.
Their diverse plant associations defend against insect infestations and limit the risk of
crop failure.
Even if they lose one crop, they will still have many other crops to feed their families.
As in many other cases over the course of history, family farmers have proven their ability
to react to new constraints.
Family farming is not a fixed agriculture unable to break away from tradition.
The coffee and cocoa crisis weakened the economy and resulted in high national debt.
The state was forced to reduce public investments, which led to serious problems in the labour
market and caused massive layoffs in cities.
As a result, many urban dwellers migrated towards the countryside in order to find work in
agriculture.
This meant that unemployed children, brothers and sisters and in-laws all flooded towards
their rural family farmlands.
You know a concuna is an entrance examination into a public service, so I was not successful.
So I came back here, I was forced to learn driving and then I realised that this driving
profession is somehow hard to mount.
So I, and I saw how my friends too were making, were living well as farmers.
Family farming absorbs or releases manpower according to the needs of other sectors of
the economy.
Therefore, it is a great regulator of the labour market.
In order to take advantage of the available family labour, these three brothers from
south-east Cameroon were able to expand their acreage on its own still sparsely populated
and minimally developed.
But in more populated areas, such as the north-west of Cameroon, such agricultural expansions
have contributed to land conflicts.
Because of the development of vegetable farms, some transhumans migratory cattle grazers have
encountered a decline in the amount of available grazing areas.
These different forms of family farms are forced to compete with each other.
To adapt to this new environment, some grazers have been forced to settle in one location.
This radical change, strongly encouraged by the state, forced the Filani herders to change
their traditional way of life.
Some have converted to vegetable cropping and others have developed new livestock rearing
practices in order to maintain a decent income on a smaller amount
of land.
The need to secure income through additional activities
outside the family farm is necessary for many farmers throughout the world, such as in Ecuador.
The Cayambe region is located in the heart of the Andes, in a valley surrounded by mountains
with peaks rising to 6,000 metres above sea level.
Farmers grow crops and breed animals in an equatorial mountain climate.
However, agricultural production is not always sufficient to meet the needs of families.
Often, at least one member of the family combines their work on the family farm with an off-farm
income-generating activity.
Family farming is not just composed of households where all income
is generated from the family farm.
Money earned off the farm can also be used to invest in the farm.
In the Cayambe region, other types of agriculture can be found.
Some farms, termed capitalists, produce flowers destined for export.
These farms do not belong to those who work the land, but to Ecuadorian or foreign investors.
Investors' main objective is to maximise the profit rates of their investments.
They continuously compare the state of their investment in agriculture to what they could make
if they were to invest in other sectors of the economy, such as industry or public services.
These capitalist farms fully depend on hired labourers, mainly farmers from the surrounding family farms,
who work in parallel on their own lands.
Agricultural production in the region therefore depends heavily on these farmers employed by the floricolas.
As far back as the era of Spanish colonialisation, both family farms and capitalist farms have shared the same territory.
However, it is the family farmers who tend to be marginalised and, for example, have limited access to irrigation.
These two types of farms also manage their workforce in very different ways.
This farmer speaks directly of the definition of family farming.
What are family farming? I'm going to the plurial because there are quite different forms, but these are farmers who are employed in farms,
in production units, agricultural, family, to know that farmers and their families work for their own accounts,
and that they can move their own family farm with the aim of improving their income in comparison with what they could do if they were to work elsewhere.
What is often added to this is that families also tend to be poor in terms of production.
There are companies who work in agriculture, but these companies are a little bit different in the sense that the relationships between the people who work in this kind of company are not business partners,
it is a relationship between father and son, mother and daughter, husband and wife, these are family relationships.
This absence of a business relationship in family farming makes a very good regulator of the labor market.
We license a worker, we license an agricultural worker, but we do not license his son.
A head of family farming will only make sure that the son, when he goes to the city to find work,
will easily find conditions to work and to remunerate, at least equivalent to those he had if he had continued to work on family farming.
It is clear that family farming has a much greater potential than the capitalist companies,
for which, of course, every additional job is an additional cost, and therefore is less profitable.
Family farming is therefore not only a small diversified agriculture,
or an agriculture that produces small surfaces and without equipment.
Family farming, when you give it the means, can also be very modern and very productive.
Family farming is not only a poor agriculture and to be paid in development.
It is also not an agriculture that only produces for self-consumption and local markets.
Family farming, on the contrary, is often a remunerator for the families of farmers all over the world,
and it can also be turned into national and international markets.
Family farming is not necessarily an agriculture that respects the environment,
nor is it an agriculture that makes investments, or an agriculture that is easily transmitted.
By the way, we should not say family farming, but rather family farming.
Family farms operate in a wide variety of ecological, economic and social contexts,
even though family farms may vary in their environmental impact,
they all have at least one common factor, the way they manage their wealth.
Investments are balanced between developing the farm and improving the wellbeing of the family.
The family-orientated nature of this type of agriculture makes it an especially good regulator of the labour market,
which is not the case in capitalist agriculture.
The family-orientated characteristic of this type of agriculture shapes a social structure,
however it still says nothing about the production methods practised on these farms.
Is this family-orientated characteristic enough to meet all the challenges of tomorrow?
Historically, most so-called developed countries have supported their family farms
and encouraged production to be oriented towards the domestic market,
thereby laying the foundation for strong economic development.
This was the case in North America during the conquest of the West, in Western Europe and in post-war Japan.
The agricultural systems of the past were created to meet the needs of society at the time.
As our world evolves, certain family farming systems are no longer as functional as they once were.
Therefore, they have to adapt in order to satisfy today's societal needs.
We shouldn't be talking about the evolution of this type of agriculture,
but today it's more about the expectations of the society.
The way we built the agricultural models, we produced milk,
we made it into a cooperative to buy milk powder to drink water.
You produce milk on your farm, you sell the cooperative to buy food that comes back to you.
There are still things that don't fit in.
As in all types of agriculture, family farms have been given a challenge
to produce quality food for a growing world population,
while preserving natural resources and generating income in rural areas,
ultimately assisting the fight against poverty.
Our agricultural world exists in a mosaic of contexts.
It is important to support the emerging solutions that are adapted to their needs,
and to encourage a type of agriculture that will be able to survive and meet our future needs.
A source of many innovations, the family farms we met
demonstrated abilities to adapt to meet challenges.
To achieve this, for example, some farmers have based their production
on local and renewable resource development.
We don't have to spend so much money on farming.
If we don't have enough money, we'll have to spend a lot of money.
That's why the basic principle is to reduce the charges.
The first winner is the one you didn't think of,
and the reduction of the charges goes through the paturing.
The one that goes all the way through is the drilling, the material.
By limiting their dependence on inputs, such as seeds,
feed for the animals, or fertilizers from outside sources,
they profit economically speaking.
In addition, they don't have to deal with some industries
known to contribute to the degradation of natural resources
and whose prices can also be volatile.
Throughout history, family farmers have always invented
a variety of techniques to enable them to benefit from their environment.
Often, these techniques are based on the intensification
of beneficial ecological processes and the use of local and renewable resources.
These techniques are sometimes grouped under the term agroecology.
The number of techniques that allow us to respect these environmental constraints
has already existed, we have been repatriated, there is still work to be done.
We know a lot about agroforestry, high-culture associations,
rotation, light association.
There is still much to discover and develop
regarding the agroecological techniques we use today.
However, a number of solutions are already being used by farmers worldwide.
I have trees in my farm, I have useful trees,
then I have trees to shed, my goko trees.
I don't go away with all the trees because I live some to get shelter in my farm.
Then Janssanga is for food, I have mangoes, apples, I have a lot.
We have only advantages in not having animals and living cultures.
By the way, I don't have a burrage, I don't have a burrage.
They are the two mothers of France, but that means the two mothers
in the same place.
Because now we have a little lost sight, we tend to do wild animals
or wild animals.
And in fact, when we do both, we have the smoke of animals.
The animals eat straws, they eat the grains of the sun,
they have all the issues of the grains.
We do it often, in the classic way,
because it's grass, it's real, it's leguminous.
Like the example, like I said, it's dry leguminous.
And so the leguminous, it's a leguminous, so it's from the sun.
Production diversification seems to be an important lever
to promote agro-ecological processes.
The complexity of the production associations may however require
the use of certain techniques and specific tools
that enable precise control.
These agricultural production systems,
as we call them, we call them agro-ecological,
are a relatively broad term today.
It is often translated as a demand for superior work.
And it is certain that if we expect farmers,
and family farmers in particular,
to give themselves more,
well, the first condition will be to ensure
that this additional work that will then be asked
in a certain way will be remunerated.
If this condition is respected,
this type of family agro-ecological agriculture
could generate income in rural areas,
a major challenge we face today.
By creating more jobs per acre,
it has real potential to reduce unemployment
in the north and the south.
It would also help decrease the rural exodus
and prevent the swelling slums in developing countries
where the population continues to grow rapidly.
And the last thing is to make jobs.
That is, to optimize our production system
so that there is more jobs on land, locally,
with all the social consequences of this on the municipalities
and the occupation of the territory.
If we want to see this type of agriculture
more agro-ecological, more generalized,
well, we will have to accept that this additional work
that will be asked will be remunerated.
And so, it will be better, yes, I think,
with higher agricultural prices and food prices.
A sustainable farm has to sustain the farmer first
before it can sustain society and the environment.
To receive more value for their work,
some family farms sell their products locally
via short food circuits.
This decreases transportation costs,
as well as limiting the number of intermediaries,
thereby increasing their profit share.
These initiatives also establish a direct connection
between farmers and consumers.
Systems known as CSAs in Canada,
short for Community Supported Agriculture,
accomplish just that.
The CSA is an important part of what we do,
and it's important because in January,
when we're starting to plan the farm,
we contact our CSA customers
and we request their deposit.
So, they give us money up front, usually in February,
and it's a good chunk of money
with which we can buy our seed,
we can start ordering our compost and our amendments,
anything that you need before you have vegetables to sell.
The nice thing about CSA and retail and farmers' market
is that the income is always consistent.
We grow our crop, we know what we're going to get for our crop.
If we're growing corn only, we don't know
that price will be determined by the international marketplace.
These systems have many advantages for farmers and consumers,
but are only part of the puzzle
to respond to our current societal food needs.
Other types of marketing systems have to be built
in order to include more farmers and consumers,
until we are able to feed even the largest of cities.
On-farm transformation of agricultural products
is another way to increase the added value of products for farmers.
It is also a way to widen the range of locally available products,
no matter the season.
For a small farm, even like us,
it's more of a transformation
because it allows us to add value to our product,
so that we have more people for the same industry.
With 70 cows, instead of 3 people,
we can feed 6-7 people, 8 with the farm,
so it's 8 people who have a living room instead of 3.
Consuming locally at a scale relevant to each product
is a way for consumers to contribute to the development
of agricultural practices
and to participate in directing the evolution of our food systems.
The piece I think consumers have to understand
is that the agriculture and food system is a co-creation
of consumers' choices driving farmers' choices.
So it's the way the system is set up today.
There's a huge wall between consumers and farmers
in the processing and distribution and retailing,
where the only real thing that passes through that is price.
Values really don't pass back.
So if consumers want to change,
if they want a different farming system, agricultural food system,
then they have to make different choices.
And the only real way to do that is through direct connections,
whether that's farmers markets, CSA programs,
working with a food co-op in the city,
purchasing from farmers and working with consumers.
These farmers who decided to adopt
agro-ecological production systems,
or short-value chain marketing systems, or both,
are commonly small-scale farmers.
What is farmer's agriculture?
Well, in my opinion, it's a family agriculture.
From what I see, there's no problem.
I'm talking about the family nature of the work.
There's no problem.
But in addition, this family agriculture
offers production systems,
mainly based on local resources,
and actually ensuring a production
that is also relatively close to the market.
There appears to be consensus on what type of agriculture
should dominate the 21st century.
It must be an agriculture that will produce
a sufficient amount of quality food
to feed a growing population,
be low-polluting,
and contribute to the fight against poverty
and hunger in the world,
as well as creating income in rural areas.
All of these points ultimately characterize family farming
and small-scale agriculture specifically.
However, farmers who try to answer to these problems
are rarely supported by their state
and are often in trouble.
If consumers can help to orient their agriculture,
only public policies have the power
to accompany farmers and citizens
to constantly modify their practices.
This support will help to democratise
the access of everyone to local food
and to respect the environment.
It is important that politicians
make a choice.
We are in the Tournament for farmers.
It is clear, there are two agricultural choices.
We are in the process.
It will be nice to have farms like ours,
systems that are alternative.
It is good, it is great,
and we are motivated to communicate.
We want it to move, there is no problem.
It is not enough.
We see it as not enough.
There are many who would like it,
but it is obvious that it will be political.
In many situations,
the problems for farmers revolve primarily
around access to stable and profitable markets.
They also need access to means of production,
such as microcredits, training,
agricultural research results,
and most importantly,
access to land and water resources.
Access to these means of production
needs to be addressed in public policies
in order to allow small-scale family agriculture
to develop.
In many countries of the world,
policies related to production
and price stabilization have been put in place
and still exist.
Beyond problems related to production factors,
such as land and water,
the major problem of family exploitation
in the world is the price of their products.
With the gradual liberalization
of agricultural markets,
the prices paid for most food products
have decreased over the decades.
However, this downward price trend,
presented as a necessary condition
for the well-being of all consumers,
poses problems for farmers,
especially in developing countries
where farmers represent
the vast majority of the population.
These farmers are producers
before being consumers,
and the falling agricultural prices
have led to a decline in their income.
They now face difficulties
and have to compete with imported staple foods
produced by a more competitive agriculture,
cheaper than they can produce themselves.
Indeed, a highly mechanized farmer
produces up to 1,000 times more grain
than a farmer working manually.
With the liberalization of agricultural trade,
farmers face direct competition
from those operating at lower cost
and with many different production capacities.
This largely explains
one of the great paradoxes of our world.
Today, most of those suffering from hunger
are farmers.
The liberalization of agricultural markets
is not just a problem of poor countries.
Today, even the most capitalized French family
exploitation is suffering,
and we will continue to suffer,
because they will never be as competitive
as the immense exploitation of Brazilian capitalists,
Dutch or Ukrainian,
which are based on a very strong mechanization,
a good market and a large scale economy.
Today, even European and North American exploits
with the largest tractors
and the most efficient trade machines
need a large amount of subsidies
to compensate the low sales prices
and the constant increase in production charges.
However, they will not be able to continue
to grow and invest in indefinite capital
without leaving the family model.
It will then be a capitalist agricultural model,
because only investors can buy this type of farm.
In this liberalized model,
farming is more of a business than a family affair,
and family farms are replaced by capitalist farms.
The farmer is no longer the farm manager
concerned with sustainability of production,
but rather a simple worker.
The owner is no longer a farmer
who has a long-term vision for his business
by controlling risk,
but an investor who would give up the farm
if other more lucrative opportunities arose.
After having seen the development of family agriculture
when markets are stable and remunerators,
what do you think of the current trend
that is to remove tariff barriers on agricultural fields?
In every country in the world,
we would prefer to build fiscal revenues
that would ensure the stabilization
and increase in prices paid to the producers.
Is it just a romantic idea
for us to live in a world that supports family farmers,
farmers who practice agroecology
and sell their products locally,
while still being able to make a decent living?
Perhaps instead, a pragmatic decision
needs to be made by all agricultural stakeholders,
as well as every citizen in our society.
We can promote this type of agriculture,
and what's more,
we can encourage these much-needed public policies.
Through these encounters with farmers around the world,
we were able to discover the diversity of family farming,
using manual tools, an ox or a tractor,
and with different histories in different climates and soils,
we discovered that those who sow can live, can survive,
and can feed humanity for millennia.
Despite the changes and developments in our societies,
these family farmers were able to feed the world in the past
and still have the capacity to secure our future.
The real issue may not be about who will feed us tomorrow,
but how our societies will help those who sow
to be able to cultivate our future.
From the dawn to the end,
the pedals of the market are in the bud,
without details, because the details are embroidered,
with all the fruits, the colors and the colors,
without any sense, without any essence,
we keep on sailing, taking the road,
traveling and traveling,
listening to the sirens, but imagine,
the people behind are in the rain,
the realistic units are on the signs,
our families are coming,
the hands plugged into the earth are the culture,
to be able to live for their flag,
to feed our lands tomorrow, but they're on the wall,
inserted into the vein,
all the labor has come from reality,
to be free, to finally be free,
and to offer our society,
our little lands are the millions,
to be our little courbes,
without ceaselessness, against hunger,
it's good, it's humanity,
so that we can support it,
and not liberalize it,
the contrasts of the market.
I come with a few grains on the ground,
decided to give homage to what we love,
and to feed humanity, I come,
questioning the people, the future of our society,
look around the club and see,
I love and hesitate, I come,
with a few grains on the ground, decided to give homage to what we love,
and to feed humanity, I come,
questioning the people, the future of our society,
look around the club and see,
I hesitate, on the signs of a country,
where this trend has divided
into the one that culture,
the one that derives from the Congo,
it makes a break and is improvised,
nomads in my own land,
It's in the air, in Normandy, all of them are heading towards the West
Culture is revolting, flying towards the New Age, and the meaning of parting
Disparities and faces, diversity and faces, inverted as they have been
And from the bottom of the sky, to the shores, to the seas, the attitude of parallel culture
The attitude of giants, the attitude of peasants
Their bodies are floating on the earth, and their teeth are resting on their faces
The deris of this drawing are cracking on the ground, they are flying
In the rhythm of the seasons, they would be able to understand each other
The consideration replaces the earth and its mysteries in the center of conversations
Right of the country now, in the dark we head to the panacea
Now, I hope that the people of Normandy have a good vision
In the middle of the sea, I have the energy to walk and roll in our food
I come with a few grains, without the dirt or the ideas
To pay tribute to those who love and hate humanity
I come to question the people, the future of our society
Look around the globe and see, I earn and hesitate, I come
I come with a few grains, without the dirt or the ideas
To pay tribute to those who love and hate humanity
I come to question the people, the future of our society
Look around the globe and see, I earn and hesitate
All my goals, if it's a pity, it's a pity
Look who cares about the reasons and without any care
If it's who is under pressure, the situation is a mess
Also, when the market is empty
Peasants in the markets, the markets are moving incessantly
The accident of production is sacrificed, it's a joke
A conspiracy, a conspiracy to be considered
Destination against the exit, direction
The lives of those who want to lose their lives
Peasants in the ruins, the great times of thinking
At what price, acquire the gold and support
Locate the markets, guarantee the future and access to the frontier
Consciousness is said to help to explore
Consciousness is said to help to explore
