( Figs. 5, 6, 15, 17)
Tortrix parana Busck, 1911: 228. “ Archips ” parana: Powell et al. 1995: 148 (new combination).
[ Archipini unplaced] parana Brown 2005: 124.
Additional material examined (2 ƠƠ, 4♀♀).— BRAZIL: 1Ơ, 1♀, Castro, Parana, E.D. Jones, 1892-5, 1912-534 ( Ơ with abdomen missing) ( BMNH). 1Ơ, Castro, Parana, Jones, 1898, 67377. KAA dissection #0155 ( BMNH). 1♀, Castro, Parana, Jones, 1898, 67376. British Museum GS #23477 [examined]. Wing venation slide #23477 [examined] ( BMNH). 1♀, Castro, Parana, Jones, 1896, 67524. KAA dissection #0156 ( BMNH). 1♀, same data as previous but 67535 ( BMNH).
Discussion.— Tortrix parana Busck, 1911 is identical in forewing pattern ( Figs. 5, 6) to Raisapoana paraisoana Razowski and Becker, 2010. However, slight differences in the male genitalia suggest they are distinct species. Specifically, T. parana has an elongated crease-like structure extending from the ventroposterior corner of the valvae ( Fig. 15) that is absent in R. paraisoana. The phalli are similar, but T. parana possesses a well-developed caulis ( Fig. 15), while R. paraisoana does not. In addition, the type localities of these two species are 1200 km apart. The female of R. paraisoana is unknown.