*************************************
* Questionnaire dataset description *
*************************************
Socio-economic description (non dependent of the work environment)

Age range
----------
<21   --> 1 
22-40 --> 2  
41-52 --> 3
53-71 --> 4 
72+   --> 5

count	301
mean	2,48
std	0,71
min	1
max	4


Genre
-------
Male   --> 1
Female --> 2

 count	299
mean	1,50
std	0,50
min	1
max	2


Education
---------
None  --> 1
High-school /secondary --> 2
Post-secondary (non-university) --> 3
University --> 4
Post-graduate (master or equivalent) --> 5
PhD degree (doctoral or equivalent)  --> 6

count	298
mean	4,35234899328859
std	1,0793490925795
min	1
max	6


Country
-------
Spain	--> 1
Greece	--> 2
Austria	--> 3
UK	--> 4

count	303
mean	2,56
std	1,26
min	1
max	4


City
------
Seville	--> 1
Bilbao	--> 2
Weiz	--> 3
Graz	--> 4
Pilea-Hortiatis	--> 5
Thesaloniki	--> 6
Cambridge	--> 7
Sussex	--> 8

count	303
mean	5,13
std	2,48
min	1
max	8


Profile_PST [2]
-----------
Pinball  --> 1
Shortcut --> 2
Thoughtful --> 3
Pinball-Shortcut --> 4
Pinball-Thoughtful  --> 5
Shortcut-Thoughtful --> 6
Pinball-Shortcut-Thoughtful --> 7

count	300
mean	3,13
std	1,41
min	1
max	7


Intentions (Pro-environmental readiness to change [3])
----------
Pre-contemplation --> 1
Contemplation --> 2
Action --> 3

count	303
mean	2,57
std	0,52
min	1
max	3


Confidence (In technology as a means to solve all environmental problems [4])
--------------
No Confidence --> 1
Confidence --> 2

count	303
mean	1,76
std	0,43
min	1
max	2


Susceptibility (Susceptibility to be persuaded [7])
-------------
LOW --> 1
HIGH --> 2

count	302
mean	1,85
std	0,35
min	1
max	2


Bibliography
------------
[1]. Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2012). Models of the user: designers’ perspectives on influencing sustainable behaviour. Journal of Design Research 14, 10(1-2), 7-27.
[2]. Tribble, S. L. (2008). Promoting environmentally responsible behaviors using motivational interviewing techniques.
[3]. Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2007). A brief version of the environmental attitudes inventory.
[4]. Meschtscherjakov, A., Gärtner, M., Mirnig, A., Rödel, C., & Tscheligi, M. (2016, April). The Persuasive Potential Questionnaire (PPQ): Challenges, Drawbacks, and Lessons Learned. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 162-175). Springer, Cham
