Check the .KMZ file for geolocalisations of the pictures. Orientation are given after the legend (eg: "S-N" means; "South is left of the pictures, north is right")
PS: The sea is generally towards the south
B: General Terrace pictures (associated image, figure 2B)
B1: Fig. 2b. N-S
B2: Close up. NE-SW
B3: Close up, notice the boulders deposits and the angular unconformity. N-S
B4: View of Lipar T3 easternmost side, and Lipar T1 on the background. Notice the clear angular unconformity and the eroded shoreline angle. N-S
B5: View of the dated part of Konarak T3. Notice the fault and the angular unconformity. NE-SW
B6: Ramin T3. Notice the angular unconformity. S-N
B7: Chabahar T5. Notice the angular unconformity. W-E

C: Terrace deposits
C1: Fig. 2c. S-N
C2: Small boulders at the base of the deposits, that we interepret as ravinement deposits? (here, base of Konarak T3 log). NE-SW
C3: Similar ravinement deposit at the base of Pasabander T2.Thickness of the boulder layer: ~50cm. W-E
C4: Similar ravinement deposit at the base of Lipar T1. Notice the angular unconformity with the underlying bedrock. S-N
C5: Beach deposits topping Pasabander T1. E-W

D: Lipar section
D1: Greater view of Fig. 2d. S-N

E: Modern boulders, i.e. rocky boulders of terrace deposits or bedrock origin, currently sedimenting within Holocene beach deposits at the feet 
of the active coastal cliff
E1: Fig. 2e. S-N
E2: Modern boulders sedimenting at the feet of Tang T1. (Here derived from both Tang T1 deposits and Tertiary bedrock). S-N
E3: Modern boulders sedimenting at the feet of Lipar T3. (Here derived from both Lipar T3 deposit and Tertiary bedrock). N-S
E4: Modern boulders sedimenting at the feet of Lipar T1. (Here mostly derived from Lipar T1 deposit). N-S
E5: Cliff feet below Pasabander T2. Notice the absence of boulders probably linked to the unconsolidated state of the young MIS3 deposit of Pasabander T2
and the fact that the bedrock here is exclusively made of marl. The terrace deposit is ~3.5m thick. N-S

F: Paleo boulders, i.e. the paleo equivalents of "E". Ancient rockfalls being preserved at the feet of uplifted paleocliffs
F1: Fig. 2f. W-E
F2: Line of boulders, preserved a few tens of meters from the current cliff position (best seen on google earth). Solid boulder deposits mark the 
original position of the paleocliff, The reason for cliff retreat is unknown and intriguing. N-S
F3: Same, looking towards the west. S-N
F4: Close up of a road cross section through one of these boulder deposits. Notice the tilted nature of the boulders compared to the subhorizontal bedding. S-N
F5,F6,F7: Paleoboulder(s) at the back of Lipar T1.Notice the boulder line on google earth (similar to F2,F3). F5: W-E, F6: W-E, F7: N-S
F8: Paleoboulders sedimented within Ramin T3. The scale is given by a black camera cap laying on the boulder. W-E

G: Normal faults
G1: Fig. 2g. S-N
G2: Outcrop of the major E-W strinking normal fault offsetting Ramin terraces, here a solidified fault gauge ~4m high. N-S
G3: Outcrop of this fault's fault plane. W-E
G4: Ridge-in-groove on the fault FW indicating normal movement (the fault is dipping south). W-E

H: Eroded shoreline angle examples
H1: Fig. 2h. N-S
H2: Close up. Notice the absence of paleocliff at the pack of the terrace. N-S
H3: Back of Pasabander T3. Notice the bedrock entirely made of marl, and the absence of paleocliff. SW-NE
H4: Eroded shoreline angle of Gurdim terrace. Here, the bedrock is also made of marl. N-S

I1-I3: Figure 2i and j; additional pictures. NW-SE

