The theory has evolved significantly beyond this website.
For the latest derivations, formulas, and predictions, see the GitHub repository — now with 55+ predictions organized into topic-specific reference files.

Geometric Wave Theory

Everything from 3 and π.

Two inputs — the integer 3 (spatial dimensions) and π (geometry of a circle) — derive all of physics. 212 predictions. Zero free parameters.

The Idea

Space is not empty — it's an elastic medium, like an extraordinarily stiff three-dimensional lattice. Everything you see — electrons, protons, light, gravity — is a wave in this medium.

This isn't an analogy. The mathematics of elastic wave mechanics directly produces every equation in physics: quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, general relativity, the Standard Model, and cosmology.

The medium has three properties: how stiff it is (k), how dense it is (η), and how far apart its nodes are (a). But none of these are free choices — in Planck units, a = 1 and k = η = 2/π. The only inputs are the integer 3 (spatial dimensions) and π (the geometry of periodicity). Everything else — every particle mass, every force, every constant — follows.

The Lagrangian

In Planck units (a = 1), the entire framework is defined by a single equation:

The GWT Lagrangian ℒ = Σ⟨i,j⟩  [ ½(φi − φj)²  +  (1/π²)(1 − cos(πφi)) ]

φi = displacement at lattice site i (dimensionless in Planck units)

Σ⟨i,j⟩ = sum over nearest neighbors on a d-dimensional cubic lattice (d = 3)

i − φj = elastic energy between neighbors (spring-like interaction)

(1/π²)(1 − cos(πφ)) = on-site cosine potential (sine-Gordon). The only periodic potential that is harmonic for small displacements and supports topological kink solutions.

This is a zero-parameter Lagrangian. The lattice spacing is 1 (Planck length), the potential depth 1/π² is fixed by topological quantization, and d = 3 is the number of spatial dimensions. The only inputs are 3 and π — nothing is adjustable.

How predictions are derived:

The Lagrangian defines the system. Predictions come from solving it — using exact analytic solutions where they exist, symmetry analysis, and numerical simulation where closed-form solutions aren't available. No free parameters enter at any step, but the mathematical steps are non-trivial:

  • Exact solutions — The sine-Gordon equation is exactly solvable. It produces kinks (topological solitons → fermions, Mkink = 8/π²), breathers (bound pairs → particle masses, Mn = (16/π²)sin(nγ)), and tunneling amplitudes (T² = e−16/π² → generation structure). These are textbook results from the DHN quantization of sine-Gordon.
  • Symmetry analysis — The d-dimensional cubic lattice has specific geometric symmetries. A 3-component displacement vector on a cubic lattice decomposes as SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1). The fine structure constant α comes from the Wyler formula applied to the bounded symmetric domain DIV(d+2) — a geometric object determined by d = 3.
  • Numerical simulation — Some quantities (like the confinement energy ratio Eratio = 1.126 used to derive me) require simulating the 3D Lagrangian on a lattice. The simulation has zero tunable physics parameters — only numerical settings (grid size, timestep) that converge to a definite answer.
  • Linearized waves — Small-amplitude solutions are phonons, which propagate at c = 1. These become photons.

Three Constants, All From 3 and π

The lattice has three mechanical properties — but they aren't free parameters. In Planck units, a = 1 (the lattice defines the Planck length) and k = η = 2/π (fixed by the sine-Gordon potential). The only true inputs are d = 3 spatial dimensions and π:

k  [stiffness]
Planck: 2/π    SI: 4.77 × 1078 N/m
Bond Stiffness (force per displacement)
The spring constant of each bond between lattice nodes. This is a force — how hard the medium pushes back when stretched. Derived from k = 2ℏc/(πa³). Appears in: ℏ = πka³/(2c), G = 2c&sup4;/(πka).
η  [inertia]
Planck: 2/π    SI: 1.385 × 10−8 kg
Node Inertia (mass per node)
How the medium resists being accelerated. This is an inertia — the mass density at each lattice site. Derived from η = 2ℏ/(πac). Like ε0 in electromagnetism: an intrinsic property of the medium, not a detectable mass.
a  [spacing]
Planck: 1    SI: 1.616 × 10−35 m
Lattice Spacing (distance between nodes)
The distance between adjacent nodes. Equal to the Planck length lP = √(ℏG/c³). This is the smallest meaningful distance — there is no space between sites to measure.

Why k = η = 2/π (same value, different physics)

k and η measure completely different things. k is a stiffness (newtons per meter). η is a mass (kilograms). They have different SI units and different physical meanings.

But in Planck units, they must be equal: k = η. Why? Because the wave speed is c = a√(k/η). If k ≠ η, the speed of light wouldn't equal 1 in natural units. The medium must be impedance-matched — stiffness and inertia in perfect balance — for waves to propagate without distortion.

The value 2/π is not chosen. It is ⟨|sin(x)|⟩ — the average of |sin(x)| over a full cycle. This is the only value consistent with the sine-Gordon cosine potential having period 2 and matching harmonic behavior at small amplitudes. Geometry fixes the number.

From Three Constants, All of Physics

The three fundamental constants of physics are not inputs — they are outputs of a lattice with d = 3 and coupling 2/π:

The Master Equations c  = a√(k/η) = 1   →  speed of light (wave speed on lattice)
ℏ  = π k a3 / (2c) = 1  →  Planck's constant (action per lattice cell)
G  = 2c4 / (π k a) = 1  →  gravitational constant (inverse lattice stiffness)

{c, ℏ, G} tells you what the constants are. {k, a, η} tells you why they exist. And 3 and π tell you there was never a choice.

Explore the Derivations →

The Score Card

212 predictions derived from two inputs: the integer 3 and π. 146 tested against experiment. 66 awaiting test or qualitative. Standard Model uses 19 free parameters. GWT uses zero.

201
Total Predictions
135
Tested
0
Free Parameters
74%
Under 1% Error
98%
Under 5% Error
100%
Under 10% Error
View All Predictions →

Particles Are Waves

Every particle in the Standard Model corresponds to a specific wave pattern in the lattice:

Particle Wave Pattern Description
Electron 1D transverse A ripple along one axis
Up quark 2D surface A surface wave on two axes
Down quark 3D bulk A bulk wave in three dimensions
Proton Spherical j₀ Fundamental spherical standing wave (rp = 0.8411 fm, 0.04%)
Photon Traveling wave A propagating disturbance at speed c
Neutrino 1D weak mode Macroscopic wave (λC ~ 4–20 μm)

Quantum “Weirdness” Explained

The Mystery The Wave Explanation
Quantum entanglement Two standing waves coupled through the same elastic medium
Heisenberg uncertainty Fourier's theorem — narrow wave has broad frequency
Probability = |ψ|² Wave intensity (how loud the disturbance is)
Spin-1/2 Two ground states: + and − (yin/yang)
Entanglement They were one wave all along — still connected
Measurement “collapses” the wave Measuring device redistributes wave energy locally

Highest-Precision Results

A sample of the most precise predictions — each derived from 3 and π with no fitting:

Result GWT Value Observed Error
α (fine structure) 1/137.042 1/137.036 0.005%
mμ/me 206.77 206.768 0.005%
mp/me 5(1+α²/2√2) = 1836.153 1836.153 <0.001 ppm
αs(MZ) 0.1179 0.1180 0.08%
Proton radius rp 0.8411 fm 0.8414 fm 0.04%
Hubble constant H0 66.8 km/s/Mpc 67.4 0.9%
sin²θW 15/64 = 0.234 0.2312 1.4%
ΩΛ (dark energy) 2/3 = 0.667 0.685 2.7%
MOND a0 1.204×10−10 1.2×10−10 0.3%
Δm²31 (neutrino) 2.523×10−3 2.534×10−3 0.4%
See All 212 Predictions → How They're Derived →

Explore the Framework

Start with the derivations, or dive into any domain of physics:

Core Derivations The Lattice Electromagnetism Nuclear / QCD Gravity & Cosmology Particle Physics Quantum Mechanics Resolved Mysteries